Minichan

Topic: Mitt Romney's gonna win.

Anonymous A started this discussion 14 years ago #20,899

Suck it. Obamatards.

Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 8 minutes later[^] [v] #335,844

Wow unemployment will cease and drop to 0% in less then 6 months. Palimony will become the norm and capitol will move to Utah.

Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 22 minutes later, 30 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #335,848

OP confirmed for mad as fuck

dw !jdTkvovFCQ joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 26 minutes later, 57 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #335,849

It's not the Superbowl or anything.. who cares

Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 9 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #335,850

@previous (dw !jdTkvovFCQ)

It is a sad day when people consider a football team to be more important than the --illuminati puppet-- president.

Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 5 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #335,852

I hope Obama wins. The Republicans are the bad guys, after all.

Anonymous B replied with this 14 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #335,854

@previous (F)
They are all bad guys who promise everything. (Little ability to deliver anything)

dw !jdTkvovFCQ replied with this 14 years ago, 41 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #335,858

@335,850 (E)jk I wasn't even sure what sport is played on the Superbowl

Anonymous F replied with this 14 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #335,859

@previous (dw !jdTkvovFCQ)
Women's tennis.

Anonymous B replied with this 14 years ago, 16 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #335,861

Image went missing@previous (F)
Lawn Bowling

Anonymous F replied with this 14 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #335,862

@previous (B)
If only... It'd be so much more interesting if it was.

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 14 years ago, 1 hour later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #335,869

@335,844 (B)
It's not about what Romney will do. It's about what Obama failed to do. lrn2politic.

Anonymous G joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 2 hours later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #335,898

I doubt Romney stands a chance, but this election cycle looks like it will be entertaining. Watching a millionaire Mormon pretend to be some down-home good ol' boy to try to appeal to voters is going to be amusing.

Anonymous B replied with this 14 years ago, 1 minute later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #335,899

@previous (G)
Very!

Kathryn !TGirlYJKXM joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 52 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #335,908

@335,869 (A)
Are we doomed?

Anonymous B replied with this 14 years ago, 6 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #335,911

@previous (Kathryn !TGirlYJKXM)
Only if you're poor. The rich will get more rich and poor dump funds into rich peoples pockets. Slavery by consent.

Kathryn !TGirlYJKXM replied with this 14 years ago, 51 seconds later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #335,914

@previous (B)
But... but... I am poor. ;_;

squeegee !firstkPE1Q joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 2 hours later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #335,922

meh, it'll be fun to watch him fuck up.
he's so out of touch with reality he's bound to make a ton of bad choices. just like bush.
hell, none of them are in touch

Ks !KansasxqvM joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 1 hour later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #335,925

@previous (squeegee !firstkPE1Q)
This is true, and I hate everything about Romney. But his poll numbers are strong, lol. Amazingly stupid Americans will vote for anybody.

q joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 6 seconds later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #335,926

I might have to riot in the streets, if he wins.

seems like a nice guy personally though.

Anonymous L joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 31 minutes later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #335,931

@335,898 (G)
kill the rich

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 14 years ago, 6 hours later, 19 hours after the original post[^] [v] #335,953

@335,908 (Kathryn !TGirlYJKXM)
It's not going to matter who's president. We'll find ourselves in a war with Iran either way.

Anonymous M joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 1 day later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #336,103

Romney will win because he's rich, period. The fact that he's not Obama helps, but ultimately, he'll win because he'll pay up for better ad slots and better endorsements.

Poorfags will experience maximum butthurt.

MAtt replied with this 14 years ago, 10 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #336,108

@previous (M)
> implying he pays for advertising himself

Anonymous N joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 6 hours later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #336,183

@previous (MAtt)
> implying he's not filthy rich enough to do so if he has to.

dw !jdTkvovFCQ replied with this 14 years ago, 17 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #336,186

@previous (N)
no he isnt

dw !jdTkvovFCQ double-posted this 14 years ago, 29 seconds later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #336,187

@336,183 (N)
also he doesnt have to so that point isnt even relevant

Anonymous L replied with this 14 years ago, 7 hours later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #336,240

@336,103 (M)
You're retarded lol. Obama has more money in his campaign fund than Romney.

Anonymous M replied with this 14 years ago, 6 hours later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #336,253

@previous (L)
Not with Super PAC money.

Anonymous L replied with this 14 years ago, 1 hour later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #336,262

@previous (M)
Actually as it happens, Obama has been massively outspending Romney, so currently Romney has more than Obama.

Anonymous M replied with this 14 years ago, 8 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #336,263

@previous (L)
On that useless Bain capital ad. Obama, top cop in the country, accuses Romney of being a criminal. Yet, Romney is a free man. Way to do you job Barry.

More Obama fail.

squeegee joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 1 hour later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #336,273

@previous (M)
> top cop
I do not believe that power is covered under the constitution. He's more like a diplomat that can declare war for a brief period of time.

Also he can fly.

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 14 years ago, 7 hours later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #336,334

@previous (squeegee)

In charge of the US Military, the CIA, FBI, NSA, and the NRO. Can declare Martial Law. I'd call that police power.

> Also he can fly.

I'm sure Libbytards actually believe this. Just as they believe Obama's not actually working to protect the wealth of Wall Street bankers to the detriment of middle-class homeowners. Or that he hasn't fucked up the economy even worse.

Or how they believe the Arab spring was a success, and Christians aren't being murdered all over the new "democratic" middle-east. Or that he doesn't really mean it when he says Israel should return to indefensible pre-1967 borders.

Or my favorite, how they don't notice Obama riding Hollywood cock. He's gonna rape the internet as we know it in his second term and lock up a good number of the young people who voted for him. LOL.

squeegee !firstkPE1Q replied with this 14 years ago, 17 minutes later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #336,339

@previous (A)
they say that about every president.

Anonymous L replied with this 14 years ago, 13 hours later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #336,451

@336,273 (squeegee)
> He's more like a diplomat that can declare war for a brief period of time.
He can defend against attacks or imminent attacks.

> In charge of the US Military, the CIA, FBI, NSA, and the NRO. Can declare Martial Law. I'd call that police power.
His statement "I do not believe that power is covered under the constitution." remains true.

Anonymous P joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 4 hours later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #336,481

I hope not.
:

Please familiarise yourself with the rules and markup syntax before posting.