squeegee joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 7 minutes later[^][v]#335,208
Not even on a tablet PC
HaikerensGuide !0VegJ9Jl.Q (OP) replied with this 14 years ago, 3 minutes later, 10 minutes after the original post[^][v]#335,209
@previous (squeegee)
What if it actually looked good while retaining the Metro UI principle. I quite like this rendition and would actually consider Windows 8 if it were more like this.
squeegee replied with this 14 years ago, 3 minutes later, 14 minutes after the original post[^][v]#335,211
@previous (HaikerensGuide !0VegJ9Jl.Q)
I'd be happy if it worked well
And quit trying to turn PCs into iPhones
Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 9 minutes later, 23 minutes after the original post[^][v]#335,212
Not straight away. Maybe after a while.
dw !jdTkvovFCQ joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 7 minutes later, 31 minutes after the original post[^][v]#335,217
probably if i can get it cheap
Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 5 hours later, 6 hours after the original post[^][v]#335,246
No, because it seems like every other windows is good.
7: great
Vista: bad
XP: great
2000: bad
98: great
Etc
Following this trend, 8 will be bad.
Fox !FXYGNx1XR. joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 3 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^][v]#335,247
I have the release preview already. It's pretty much identical to Windows 7, but I like the lower resource usage.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 14 years ago, 12 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^][v]#335,250
@335,246 (E) > Windows 2000 > bad
It was Windows ME that was notorious. And IIRC, 2000 was part of the NT non-household range. But that didn't stop us from using it at home. That operating system was fantastic, but Windows ME was absolutely atrocious.
advi !!3gpAcg/hF joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 23 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^][v]#335,253
The better performance is great, but I'll probably wait until custom theming is possible and I can fix the horrifying appearance of Metro.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 14 years ago, 17 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^][v]#335,256
@previous (advi !!3gpAcg/hF)
Metro isn't that bad if done right, like in @335,209 (HaikerensGuide !0VegJ9Jl.Q)
advi !!3gpAcg/hF replied with this 14 years ago, 9 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^][v]#335,257
@previous (A)
That's just an early rendition. I'm using the RP and holy shit, Metro is painful to use.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 14 years ago, 8 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^][v]#335,258
@previous (advi !!3gpAcg/hF)
Yeah that homescreen thing looks... disgusting. But metro can be done right. It is a design language, and Windows 8 is a profanity.
Shattered Tangent !0gytnDUx/. joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 17 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^][v]#335,328
I think that they should have kept the windows design conventions for 8, and made a seperate OS for tablets. Trying to merge them together just feels off.