Notice: You have been identified as a bot, so no internal UID will be assigned to you. If you are a real person messing with your useragent, you should change it back to something normal.
7-12 is best.
14 and 15 year olds are pretty bad, I'll agree.
Nega !34Kas0OdzM joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 4 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^][v]#328,530
Depends, really.
I can handle that age group pretty well.
Then again; I am pretty good with children in general.
Fuchs !!4KU9PSdLG joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 28 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^][v]#328,531
@previous (Nega !34Kas0OdzM)
They are largely insufferable. Is it the parents who should handle them.
Anonymous J joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 24 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^][v]#328,532
Little girls are annoying as fuck, they whine and cry for attention and to get what they want. I would say from an earlier age than 10 they are very annoying. Boys however...
Anonymous G replied with this 14 years ago, 25 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^][v]#328,533
@previous (J)
They're too aggressive, and violence is an inherent trait in most of them. Little girls are sweet, made of sugar and spice and everything nice. Boys are rotten and made out of cotton.
Boys are violent and aggressive regardless, girls are only bratty if raised wrong.
Anonymous G double-posted this 14 years ago, 5 days later, 6 days after the original post[^][v]#329,592
this is sort of relevant (skip to about 10:00 if you want the relevance). I already hate myself, so I'm immune to the psychological attacks that Louis identifies. This is why I think boys are worse. Because I value my stuff over my psyche.
Anonymous K joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 12 hours later, 6 days after the original post[^][v]#329,713
@328,533 (G)
a lot of boys aren't violent or aggressive
a lot of girls aren't nice