Notice: You have been identified as a bot, so no internal UID will be assigned to you. If you are a real person messing with your useragent, you should change it back to something normal.
Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 4 minutes later[^][v]#326,820
His well-documented love for electric scooters was all-consuming, bordering on fetishism. It's hardly surprising he would say something like that.
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 1 minute later, 5 minutes after the original post[^][v]#326,821
@OP
Yes, I believe that was in his blockbuster sequel "On the motion of animals 2: Xtreme scooter edition".
Anonymous B replied with this 14 years ago, 10 minutes later, 16 minutes after the original post[^][v]#326,822
@previous (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
That was probably his best work. Here's an extract I found:
Elsewhere we have investigated in detail the movement of electric scooters after their various kinds, the differences between them, and the reasons for their particular characters (for some electric scooters fly, some swim, some walk, others move in various other ways); there remains an investigation of the common ground of any sort of electric scooter movement whatsoever.
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 14 years ago, 2 minutes later, 18 minutes after the original post[^][v]#326,823
@previous (B)
Yes, it was a surprisingly thorough examination of scooters, considering that it was written 2500 years before scooters were invented.
Anonymous B replied with this 14 years ago, 1 minute later, 19 minutes after the original post[^][v]#326,824
@previous (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
He was just that good!
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 14 years ago, 2 minutes later, 21 minutes after the original post[^][v]#326,825
@previous (B)
Well obviously. Why else would people --randomly assign shit to him that anyone with a basic understanding of his philosophy would know is something he'd never say-- accurately quote him on the internet?
(Edited 19 seconds later.)
Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 5 minutes later, 26 minutes after the original post[^][v]#326,827
@326,823 (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
So he was a philosopher and he could time travel.
Interesting.
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 14 years ago, 3 minutes later, 30 minutes after the original post[^][v]#326,828
@previous (D)
No he invented time travel. Here, let me quote him in the original Greek:
"dis time travel shit be wack yo. I invented it and shit."
-The Scattergories 3: Gayniggers from Outer Space redux
Anonymous B replied with this 14 years ago, 1 minute later, 32 minutes after the original post[^][v]#326,829
@326,827 (D)
"People assume that time is a strict progression of cause-of-effect...but actually, from a non-linear, non-subjective viewpoint, it's more like a big ball of wibbly-wobbly...timey-wimey...stuff"
-Aristotle on time
(Edited 29 seconds later.)
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 14 years ago, 3 minutes later, 36 minutes after the original post[^][v]#326,830
@previous (B)
No that was actually Dumbledore talking about quantum physics.