Lee O'Nidas !nBpim1wazU joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 1 hour later[^][v]#325,034
It never gives the date, it just gives a 10 year timespan when an earthquake might have occured.
I'm sure they'll say he died around Easter or Good Friday.
Catherine !TGirlYJKXM (OP) replied with this 14 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^][v]#325,036
@previous (Lee O'Nidas !nBpim1wazU)
I thought the date they gave was April 3, 33 AD?
Lee O'Nidas !nBpim1wazU replied with this 14 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^][v]#325,039
Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^][v]#325,040
@325,036 (Catherine !TGirlYJKXM)
So Easter is actually pretty close. Way to go, Catholics!
Lee O'Nidas !nBpim1wazU replied with this 14 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^][v]#325,042
The article ended with: > By putting together several clues from the Gospel of Matthew, combined with the Jewish calendar and astronomical data, the researchers revealed the date of the crucifixion with a fair degree of precision, the journal said.
So all the scientists did was find some microquake happened between 26AD and 36 AD. And the precise date was just the same calculations as before. None of the Jesus death estimates are before or after 36 AD except L Ron Hubbard who thinks Jesus didn't exist.
Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 4 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^][v]#325,045