advi !!3gpAcg/hF joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 7 minutes later[^][v]#321,640
Looks better, though still a bit ugly.
HaikerensGuide !0VegJ9Jl.Q joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 13 minutes later, 21 minutes after the original post[^][v]#321,642
> Explorer STILL without tabs
Just merge IE and explorer again...
Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 29 minutes later, 51 minutes after the original post[^][v]#321,650
This Windows XP patch looks promising.
Broseph !!fxnDb+Ve4 joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 7 hours later, 8 hours after the original post[^][v]#321,710
> moving away from Aero Glass — the UI first introduced with Vista. According to the company, this means visual changes that include "flattening surfaces, removing reflections, and scaling back distracting gradients."
Sounds and looks fucking boring. I like the popping surfaces, reflections, and gradients.
@previous (D) > This Windows XP patch looks promising.
I don't want an OS that looks like it's 10+ years old. The updated aesthetics of Vista and Windows 7 were the best things they had going for them. People hated the way they functioned and having to re-learn how to use the OS. What people want is an OS that looks like 7 but functions like XP. This is the exact opposite and a step in the wrong direction. In that picture, there isn't even a start button. And they say they're not worried about "learnability."
I get that they're gearing it for tablets, but that's no reason to bland it down for people who still enjoy full-powered desktops.
Nexus !jNexusRe/. joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 11 minutes later, 8 hours after the original post[^][v]#321,711
Looks like Microsoft is wanting a repeat of Windows ME.
Anonymous D replied with this 14 years ago, 36 minutes later, 9 hours after the original post[^][v]#321,715
@321,710 (Broseph !!fxnDb+Ve4)
Yep. I agree. It was sarcasm.