Topic: Sex is to STDs...
HaikerensGuide !0VegJ9Jl.Q started this discussion 14 years ago #19,407
...what porn is to computer viruses.
vocalon !!jdS+H4VgV joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 2 minutes later[^] [v] #319,292
In other words your new computer business is actually diagnosing people with STDs.
Also you've got the clap.
Also you've got the clap.
HaikerensGuide !0VegJ9Jl.Q (OP) replied with this 14 years ago, 3 minutes later, 5 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #319,298
@previous (vocalon !!jdS+H4VgV)
lol
The point is that half of the viruses I find are caused by porn sites.
lol
The point is that half of the viruses I find are caused by porn sites.
brie !OudrPWaUDQ joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 1 minute later, 7 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #319,300
HaikerensGuide !0VegJ9Jl.Q (OP) replied with this 14 years ago, 1 minute later, 8 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #319,301
@previous (brie !OudrPWaUDQ)
The other half are from computers used by old people.
The other half are from computers used by old people.
(Edited 9 seconds later.)
brie !OudrPWaUDQ replied with this 14 years ago, 21 minutes later, 29 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #319,308
Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 4 minutes later, 34 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #319,311
Sexualizing computers again, I see?
Catherine !TGirlYJKXM joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 32 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #319,325
Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 15 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #319,328
Falco !PZmcClOUDk joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 25 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #319,333
HaikerensGuide !0VegJ9Jl.Q (OP) replied with this 14 years ago, 2 hours later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #319,361
Anonymous H joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 19 hours later, 23 hours after the original post[^] [v] #319,639
STD risk is overrated. Nobody tells you not to drive because you'll get killed in a car wreck, but they sure as hell tell you not to have sex because you'll get HIV.
Protip: the former is about 20x more likely than the latter.
Protip: the former is about 20x more likely than the latter.
Falco !PZmcClOUDk replied with this 14 years ago, 51 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #319,645
Falco !PZmcClOUDk double-posted this 14 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #319,646
@319,639 (H)
> STD risk is overrated. Nobody tells you not to drive because you'll get killed in a car wreck, but they sure as hell tell you not to have sex because you'll get HIV.
>
> Protip: the former is about 20x more likely than the latter.
That has to be the dumbest argument I've read on the internet this year.
> STD risk is overrated. Nobody tells you not to drive because you'll get killed in a car wreck, but they sure as hell tell you not to have sex because you'll get HIV.
>
> Protip: the former is about 20x more likely than the latter.
That has to be the dumbest argument I've read on the internet this year.
Broseph !!fxnDb+Ve4 joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 14 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #319,651
@previous (Falco !PZmcClOUDk)
He's got a good point. Wearing a condom is a lot like wearing a seat belt, except seat belts don't make a car ride less enjoyable.
Are you still a virgin?
He's got a good point. Wearing a condom is a lot like wearing a seat belt, except seat belts don't make a car ride less enjoyable.
Are you still a virgin?
HaikerensGuide !0VegJ9Jl.Q (OP) replied with this 14 years ago, 5 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #319,655
@previous (Broseph !!fxnDb+Ve4)
> seat belts don't make a car ride less enjoyable.
Except for when they start ratcheting just from slight G-forces.
> seat belts don't make a car ride less enjoyable.
Except for when they start ratcheting just from slight G-forces.
Broseph !!fxnDb+Ve4 replied with this 14 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #319,656
HaikerensGuide !0VegJ9Jl.Q (OP) replied with this 14 years ago, 15 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #319,660
@previous (Broseph !!fxnDb+Ve4)
The fuckers start to ratchet if you don't slow down perfectly smooth. It's done me well in terms of braking good, but it's still irritating as hell. Especially when someone not of the family drives it.
The fuckers start to ratchet if you don't slow down perfectly smooth. It's done me well in terms of braking good, but it's still irritating as hell. Especially when someone not of the family drives it.
Anonymous H replied with this 14 years ago, 43 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #319,682
Falco !PZmcClOUDk replied with this 14 years ago, 2 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #319,738
@319,660 (HaikerensGuide !0VegJ9Jl.Q)
> The fuckers start to ratchet if you don't slow down perfectly smooth. It's done me well in terms of braking good, but it's still irritating as hell. Especially when someone not of the family drives it.
Okay. I'm a hard braker and even I have NEVER had a problem with that sort of thing unless I was braking for an emergency. Lrn2drive
> The fuckers start to ratchet if you don't slow down perfectly smooth. It's done me well in terms of braking good, but it's still irritating as hell. Especially when someone not of the family drives it.
Okay. I'm a hard braker and even I have NEVER had a problem with that sort of thing unless I was braking for an emergency. Lrn2drive
Nexus !jNexusRe/. joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 55 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #319,762
> Using windows