Topic: After all these years, Argentina are STILL butthurt over the Falklands.
Anonymous A started this discussion 14 years ago #19,335
http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2012/may/04/falklands-olympic-ad-insensitive-stunt-argentinaLOL. You can almost taste their tears.
(Edited 1 minute later.)
dw joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 3 minutes later[^] [v] #318,144
> guardian
Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 2 minutes later, 5 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #318,145
I know, it's hilarious. :')
It's also funny that the people on the island want to remain British but Argentina simply doesn't care.
It's also funny that the people on the island want to remain British but Argentina simply doesn't care.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 14 years ago, 9 minutes later, 14 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #318,146
@previous (Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx)
They don't believe the the Falklanders have any right to self-determination, then they turn around and say Britain is the one having a "colonialist" attitude!
Their entire claim to the islands is ridiculous anyway - they believe Argentina 'inherited' Spain's claim to the Falklands.
They don't believe the the Falklanders have any right to self-determination, then they turn around and say Britain is the one having a "colonialist" attitude!
Their entire claim to the islands is ridiculous anyway - they believe Argentina 'inherited' Spain's claim to the Falklands.
(Edited 1 minute later.)
Anonymous A (OP) double-posted this 14 years ago, 44 seconds later, 15 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #318,147
Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx replied with this 14 years ago, 32 minutes later, 47 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #318,153
@previous (A)
I don't know why he dislikes them, but I find they can be irritating in their own way. While the Daily Mail yells about things like immigrants and video games being evil, the Guardian yells about things like the Lord of the Rings being "racist" and calling footage of a policeman arresting an aggressive drunk "officer brutality".
I don't know why he dislikes them, but I find they can be irritating in their own way. While the Daily Mail yells about things like immigrants and video games being evil, the Guardian yells about things like the Lord of the Rings being "racist" and calling footage of a policeman arresting an aggressive drunk "officer brutality".
(Edited 14 seconds later.)
Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx double-posted this 14 years ago, 1 minute later, 49 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #318,154
@318,146 (A)
lol hypocrisy
I don't see why they're so butthurt over a tiny island that's miles away from them anyway. They would gain hardly anything if they took over the Falklands.
lol hypocrisy
I don't see why they're so butthurt over a tiny island that's miles away from them anyway. They would gain hardly anything if they took over the Falklands.
Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 12 seconds later, 49 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #318,155
Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 5 minutes later, 55 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #318,157
@318,145 (Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx)
> It's also funny that the people on the island want to remain British but Argentina simply doesn't care.
Implying government have ever been about what people want.
> It's also funny that the people on the island want to remain British but Argentina simply doesn't care.
Implying government have ever been about what people want.
dw replied with this 14 years ago, 9 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #318,161
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 14 years ago, 41 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #318,172
@318,153 (Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx)
I read the article (if you're referring to Wraiths and Race?), and it was hilarious. That kind of stuff is found only in the opinion (Comment is Free) section of the Guardian, and thankfully it's not exactly common compared to other newspapers. But I get what you mean.
@previous (dw)
Roughly: Independent > Guardian > everything else > Telegraph > Times > Sun > Daily Mail > Daily Star
@318,154 (Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx)
The way they act toward the Falklands leads me to doubt they even want the Islands. Maybe it's just a handy issue the Argentinian government can use to foster nationalist sentiment and distract Argentinians from the real issues facing the country.
I read the article (if you're referring to Wraiths and Race?), and it was hilarious. That kind of stuff is found only in the opinion (Comment is Free) section of the Guardian, and thankfully it's not exactly common compared to other newspapers. But I get what you mean.
@previous (dw)
Roughly: Independent > Guardian > everything else > Telegraph > Times > Sun > Daily Mail > Daily Star
@318,154 (Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx)
The way they act toward the Falklands leads me to doubt they even want the Islands. Maybe it's just a handy issue the Argentinian government can use to foster nationalist sentiment and distract Argentinians from the real issues facing the country.
(Edited 29 seconds later.)
Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 6 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #318,175
Argentinians are stupid and arrogant. The only good thing ever to come out of that country was the tango, and that's just a fucking dance. Even niggers can make a dance.
Anonymous G joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 10 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #318,178
The British Empire. The Brits cannot even deal with Rupert Murdock much less the rest of the world. Brits once tried to rule the world and control it. Now they have India as a reminder every day about why this old policy fails. Brits now complain as Indians and Pakistanis are taking over the UK. They also have a mass of Africans in the UK as a result & complain complain & complain. Serves them right lolo
Argentina used just one cheep French missile to take out the brand new HMS Sheffield.
Irony is that the HMS Sheffield, Guided Missile Destroyer, was a brand new guided missile destroyer lolol.
Brits do well making Fish n Chips and throwing great massive weddings for Prince n Princesses at the tax payers expense of course.
Argentina used just one cheep French missile to take out the brand new HMS Sheffield.
Irony is that the HMS Sheffield, Guided Missile Destroyer, was a brand new guided missile destroyer lolol.
Brits do well making Fish n Chips and throwing great massive weddings for Prince n Princesses at the tax payers expense of course.
(Edited 1 minute later.)
Anonymous E replied with this 14 years ago, 2 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #318,180
@previous (G)
> Argentina used just one cheep French missile to take out the brand new HMS Sheffield.
But why wasn't is 'one cheap Argentine missile'? Oh that's right, it's cause Argentinians are stupid and arrogant.
> Argentina used just one cheep French missile to take out the brand new HMS Sheffield.
But why wasn't is 'one cheap Argentine missile'? Oh that's right, it's cause Argentinians are stupid and arrogant.
Anonymous F replied with this 14 years ago, 3 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #318,181
@previous (E)
Why do you suppose this commerical exists in the first place? Could it be because Argentinians are stupid and arrogant?
Why do you suppose this commerical exists in the first place? Could it be because Argentinians are stupid and arrogant?
Anonymous G replied with this 14 years ago, 2 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #318,182
@318,180 (E)
Because Argentina was smart enough to buy a French Product on the cheep. If they were stupid like the Brits they would have designed their own & it would have failed just as the HMS Sheffield failed the first time out.
Arrogance is any country no matter which country....Trying to hold onto land they took as ill gotten gains. Brit newspapers are filled with lutz over what the Rag heads are doing inside the UK.
I love the lutz this gives me.
Because Argentina was smart enough to buy a French Product on the cheep. If they were stupid like the Brits they would have designed their own & it would have failed just as the HMS Sheffield failed the first time out.
Arrogance is any country no matter which country....Trying to hold onto land they took as ill gotten gains. Brit newspapers are filled with lutz over what the Rag heads are doing inside the UK.
I love the lutz this gives me.
Anonymous F replied with this 14 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #318,183
@previous (G)
You've never met an Argentinian. Talk to me after you've waited tables in Buzios for a year.
You've never met an Argentinian. Talk to me after you've waited tables in Buzios for a year.
Anonymous G replied with this 14 years ago, 4 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #318,184
@previous (F)
Lived and worked there on and off.
Fantastic Food
Food in UK? Only good when its Curries. Other then Fish n Chips - Mutton represents the best of what the Brits could come up with on their own. Every smell Mutton?
Warm Beer lolo
Meat pies. & You know their is Soylent green, in the meat pies.
Lived and worked there on and off.
Fantastic Food
Food in UK? Only good when its Curries. Other then Fish n Chips - Mutton represents the best of what the Brits could come up with on their own. Every smell Mutton?
Warm Beer lolo
Meat pies. & You know their is Soylent green, in the meat pies.
Anonymous F replied with this 14 years ago, 2 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #318,185
@previous (G)
You're lying. If you had, you wouldn't like Argentinans. Seeing as how a good 25% of them walk out without paying the check.
You know why they do that right? It's cause they're stupid and arrogant.
You're lying. If you had, you wouldn't like Argentinans. Seeing as how a good 25% of them walk out without paying the check.
You know why they do that right? It's cause they're stupid and arrogant.
Anonymous G replied with this 14 years ago, 4 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #318,187
@previous (F)
I can see you are on the Rag re Argentinians.
Have a good day because I have some $$ work to do.
Its not really about Argentinians, its about the UK holding on to a bit of land they have no right to hold on too. British Empire long dead and gone. Now they sit on their own island isolated from the rest of the world and they as the USA watch China take over the world. Hey someone has to be on top.
Perhaps one day China will rescue the Falklands.
I can see you are on the Rag re Argentinians.
Have a good day because I have some $$ work to do.
Its not really about Argentinians, its about the UK holding on to a bit of land they have no right to hold on too. British Empire long dead and gone. Now they sit on their own island isolated from the rest of the world and they as the USA watch China take over the world. Hey someone has to be on top.
Perhaps one day China will rescue the Falklands.
Anonymous F replied with this 14 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #318,188
@previous (G)
Said the stupid and arrogant Argentinian.
By the way. Britian holds onto that land because you Aregentians are stupid and weak. Even more stupid and weak than the British are.
Said the stupid and arrogant Argentinian.
By the way. Britian holds onto that land because you Aregentians are stupid and weak. Even more stupid and weak than the British are.
(Edited 2 minutes later.)
Anonymous E replied with this 14 years ago, 4 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #318,189
Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx replied with this 14 years ago, 21 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #318,199
@318,187 (G)
> Its not really about Argentinians, its about the UK holding on to a bit of land they have no right to hold on too. British Empire long dead and gone.
So you're saying that any land gained by ye olde British colonialism should be given back? By that logic, America and Australia should be given back to the natives too.
Besides, the people on the Falklands want to stay British and the Argentinians shouldn't even be bothered about such tiny islands anyway.
> Its not really about Argentinians, its about the UK holding on to a bit of land they have no right to hold on too. British Empire long dead and gone.
So you're saying that any land gained by ye olde British colonialism should be given back? By that logic, America and Australia should be given back to the natives too.
Besides, the people on the Falklands want to stay British and the Argentinians shouldn't even be bothered about such tiny islands anyway.
Anonymous H joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 2 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #318,200
Anonymous G replied with this 14 years ago, 13 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #318,207
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 14 years ago, 13 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #318,215
Agency condemns its own Falklands advert - http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-latin-america-17963577
A British-owned advertising agency has condemned its team in Argentina over an "offensive" video showing an Argentine athlete training in the Falklands.
The political advert shows hockey captain Fernando Zylberberg preparing for London 2012.
It ends with: "To compete on English soil we train on Argentine soil."
Young & Rubicam, owned by UK company WPP, said: "We strongly condemn this work and have asked the Argentine government to pull the spot."
The 90-second video - broadcast in Argentina on Wednesday night - shows Zylberberg running in Port Stanley and exercising outside the Globe Tavern.
The advert, which also features a brief shot of him training on the steps of a World War I memorial, is the latest move by Argentina to reassert its claim to the British overseas territory which it calls the Malvinas.
"It has come to our attention that our agency in Argentina created an ad for the Argentine government that has deeply offended many people in the UK and around the world," a spokesman for Young & Rubicam said.
"While we don't believe it was ever the intention of the ad's creators to desecrate a war memorial, they behaved in a manner that is unacceptable to our company."
The political advert shows hockey captain Fernando Zylberberg preparing for London 2012.
It ends with: "To compete on English soil we train on Argentine soil."
Young & Rubicam, owned by UK company WPP, said: "We strongly condemn this work and have asked the Argentine government to pull the spot."
The 90-second video - broadcast in Argentina on Wednesday night - shows Zylberberg running in Port Stanley and exercising outside the Globe Tavern.
The advert, which also features a brief shot of him training on the steps of a World War I memorial, is the latest move by Argentina to reassert its claim to the British overseas territory which it calls the Malvinas.
"It has come to our attention that our agency in Argentina created an ad for the Argentine government that has deeply offended many people in the UK and around the world," a spokesman for Young & Rubicam said.
"While we don't believe it was ever the intention of the ad's creators to desecrate a war memorial, they behaved in a manner that is unacceptable to our company."
Anonymous G replied with this 14 years ago, 4 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #318,220
@previous (A)
> that has deeply offended many people in the UK
lolol
Brits are known for having noses up in the air. Brits are easy to offend.
It offends me they hold onto land that was taken as part of the Imperial land grab and they keep holding on to it.
> that has deeply offended many people in the UK
lolol
Brits are known for having noses up in the air. Brits are easy to offend.
It offends me they hold onto land that was taken as part of the Imperial land grab and they keep holding on to it.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 14 years ago, 1 second later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #318,221
Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx replied with this 14 years ago, 25 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #318,231
@318,220 (G)
> It offends me they hold onto land that was taken as part of the Imperial land grab and they keep holding on to it.
@318,199 (Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx)
> So you're saying that any land gained by ye olde British colonialism should be given back? By that logic, America and Australia should be given back to the natives too.
thee thy or eye should respond re my post
> It offends me they hold onto land that was taken as part of the Imperial land grab and they keep holding on to it.
@318,199 (Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx)
> So you're saying that any land gained by ye olde British colonialism should be given back? By that logic, America and Australia should be given back to the natives too.
thee thy or eye should respond re my post
(Edited 38 seconds later.)
Anonymous I joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 3 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #318,233
Oil.
Anonymous D replied with this 14 years ago, 5 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #318,234
If Argentina took hold of the Falklands it would be a south American ghetto within a month
Anonymous I replied with this 14 years ago, 1 minute later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #318,235
Anonymous G replied with this 14 years ago, 8 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #318,241
@318,234 (D)
lolo
Perhaps much like London has turned into many.
Brixton - Chelsea - Hounslow East and Hounslow West - Harlesden and Tottenham - Peckham - Dalston - Stoke Newington - Catford Bridge area - Finsbury Park - muswell hill - Green Lanes in Hackney -
Could go on and on and on lolo
lolo
Perhaps much like London has turned into many.
Brixton - Chelsea - Hounslow East and Hounslow West - Harlesden and Tottenham - Peckham - Dalston - Stoke Newington - Catford Bridge area - Finsbury Park - muswell hill - Green Lanes in Hackney -
Could go on and on and on lolo
Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx replied with this 14 years ago, 24 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #318,251
Anonymous G replied with this 14 years ago, 6 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #318,258
Anonymous I replied with this 14 years ago, 3 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #318,264
@previous (G)
You dont know what you are talking about. You are either stoned or a foreigner. in either regard, please go to sleep.
You dont know what you are talking about. You are either stoned or a foreigner. in either regard, please go to sleep.
HaikerensGuide !0VegJ9Jl.Q joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 28 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #318,297
Du ARGentina?
Anonymous G replied with this 14 years ago, 19 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #318,322
@318,264 (I)
> foreigner
Yes
I actually enjoy England. However I also enjoy pointing out the foibles & lutz of merry ole UK.
> foreigner
Yes
I actually enjoy England. However I also enjoy pointing out the foibles & lutz of merry ole UK.
Anonymous D replied with this 14 years ago, 1 hour later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #318,382
@318,241 (G)
> lolo
>
> Perhaps much like London has turned into many.
>
> Brixton - Chelsea - Hounslow East and Hounslow West - Harlesden and Tottenham - Peckham - Dalston - Stoke Newington - Catford Bridge area - Finsbury Park - muswell hill - Green Lanes in Hackney -
>
> Could go on and on and on lolo
All those areas you named are very trendy. I live in London, you dont. Stop talking out of your asshole.
Also my girlfriend lives in Stoke Newington, that place is so fucking hip.
> lolo
>
> Perhaps much like London has turned into many.
>
> Brixton - Chelsea - Hounslow East and Hounslow West - Harlesden and Tottenham - Peckham - Dalston - Stoke Newington - Catford Bridge area - Finsbury Park - muswell hill - Green Lanes in Hackney -
>
> Could go on and on and on lolo
All those areas you named are very trendy. I live in London, you dont. Stop talking out of your asshole.
Also my girlfriend lives in Stoke Newington, that place is so fucking hip.
(Edited 1 minute later.)
Anonymous G replied with this 14 years ago, 18 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #318,400
Anonymous G double-posted this 14 years ago, 3 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #318,402
Potential crime in Stoke Newington,Anonymous D replied with this 14 years ago, 1 minute later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #318,404
@318,400 (G)
That doesn't prove anything. London had some riots and delt with them. You're like that dude who watches a hollywood movie then suddenly becomes an expert on what ever the movie subject was about. You're clutching at straws is funny to everyone and make you look like a jackass.
That doesn't prove anything. London had some riots and delt with them. You're like that dude who watches a hollywood movie then suddenly becomes an expert on what ever the movie subject was about. You're clutching at straws is funny to everyone and make you look like a jackass.
Anonymous G replied with this 14 years ago, 4 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #318,406
@previous (D)
Relax dude. Only a visitor to your city. Never robbed except for some crappy brit food and warm beer. Sure when beer was invented it was at room temp.
Funny how after beer was invented they invented refrigeration yet the brits never discovered such.
Relax dude. Only a visitor to your city. Never robbed except for some crappy brit food and warm beer. Sure when beer was invented it was at room temp.
Funny how after beer was invented they invented refrigeration yet the brits never discovered such.
Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx replied with this 14 years ago, 2 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #318,407
Anonymous D replied with this 14 years ago, 1 minute later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #318,410
Anonymous G replied with this 14 years ago, 5 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #318,413
@318,407 (Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx)
Sorry about that.
> > So you're saying that any land gained by ye olde British colonialism should be given back? By that logic, America and Australia should be given back to the natives too.
In a perfect world HELL YES. After all these years not very practical. It pisses me off that USA grabbed on to Hawaii. USA has no business holding on to other Islands either.
The Falklands make no fucking sense at all. Odd how the Brits left the California Channel Islands alone (Oil there)
Perhaps it was because the Brits lost out to Russia and later the Spanish. In any case this colonialism/landgrab/ Sucks.
At least the Brits are experiencing lots of lutz re mass of Rag Head misery lolol. French as well. That should teach each of them to leave the fuck alone on Imperialism/LandGrabs/
I feel guilty using Rag Heads to lump the Indian issue when it comes to Brits. In any case I am thrilled that this Indian issue is causing Brits grief at home currently.
Sorry about that.
> > So you're saying that any land gained by ye olde British colonialism should be given back? By that logic, America and Australia should be given back to the natives too.
In a perfect world HELL YES. After all these years not very practical. It pisses me off that USA grabbed on to Hawaii. USA has no business holding on to other Islands either.
The Falklands make no fucking sense at all. Odd how the Brits left the California Channel Islands alone (Oil there)
Perhaps it was because the Brits lost out to Russia and later the Spanish. In any case this colonialism/landgrab/ Sucks.
At least the Brits are experiencing lots of lutz re mass of Rag Head misery lolol. French as well. That should teach each of them to leave the fuck alone on Imperialism/LandGrabs/
I feel guilty using Rag Heads to lump the Indian issue when it comes to Brits. In any case I am thrilled that this Indian issue is causing Brits grief at home currently.
(Edited 1 minute later.)
Anonymous D replied with this 14 years ago, 9 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #318,415
@previous (G)> Rag Head misery
Less than 1% of the population.
Lovely curry houses.
24 hour shops ran by Inidans.
Rich Inidain familys investing in the UK.
> Rag Head misery
> mfw your mad at my country
Anonymous H replied with this 14 years ago, 7 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #318,416
Syntax... You're not fooling anyone. You can stop being anon now. We know it's you. Every time.
Anonymous E replied with this 14 years ago, 58 minutes later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #318,438
@318,175 (F)
> Argentinians are stupid and arrogant. The only good thing ever to come out of that country was the tango, and that's just a fucking dance. Even niggers can make a dance.
Implying Argentinians aren't niggers.
> Argentinians are stupid and arrogant. The only good thing ever to come out of that country was the tango, and that's just a fucking dance. Even niggers can make a dance.
Implying Argentinians aren't niggers.
Anonymous K joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 5 minutes later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #318,443
Anonymous E replied with this 14 years ago, 21 minutes later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #318,446
@previous (K)
Of course I have. It was a crucial event in convincing me of the validity such prejudice. As was the Falkland war, and this very ad under discussion.
And just so we're clear, I didn't mean brown like niggers. I'd never be so superficial. I meant they walk around acting as if the world owes them something despite having contributed nothing of value to it.
They're practically the textbook definition of unwarrantable self importance. But I really should stop now. It's not fair when they're not here to defend themselves. 1. They're too poor to afford internet and 2. They're too arrogant to learn English.
Of course I have. It was a crucial event in convincing me of the validity such prejudice. As was the Falkland war, and this very ad under discussion.
And just so we're clear, I didn't mean brown like niggers. I'd never be so superficial. I meant they walk around acting as if the world owes them something despite having contributed nothing of value to it.
They're practically the textbook definition of unwarrantable self importance. But I really should stop now. It's not fair when they're not here to defend themselves. 1. They're too poor to afford internet and 2. They're too arrogant to learn English.
(Edited 3 minutes later.)
Anonymous I replied with this 14 years ago, 7 hours later, 17 hours after the original post[^] [v] #318,577
Dr Bumhert joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 10 minutes later, 17 hours after the original post[^] [v] #318,580
Anonymous G replied with this 14 years ago, 7 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #318,631
Anonymous I replied with this 14 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #318,637
Anonymous G replied with this 14 years ago, 43 seconds later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #318,638
Anonymous I replied with this 14 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #318,641
Anonymous G replied with this 14 years ago, 6 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #318,648
@previous (I)
You hit the thread with
> Oil.
Just because you need lube for fap, is no reason for Imperialism/Colonialism/
You hit the thread with
> Oil.
Just because you need lube for fap, is no reason for Imperialism/Colonialism/
Anonymous I replied with this 14 years ago, 4 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #318,654
@previous (G)
I hit it with
> Oil
because that is why they want the islands back. no other reason.
argentina have no claim - or at least spain and a load of other countries have bigger claims than them.
bottom line is, they are gutted we destroyed them before and are trying to use democratic methods to achieve their aims because they are cowards.
I hit it with
> Oil
because that is why they want the islands back. no other reason.
argentina have no claim - or at least spain and a load of other countries have bigger claims than them.
bottom line is, they are gutted we destroyed them before and are trying to use democratic methods to achieve their aims because they are cowards.
Anonymous G replied with this 14 years ago, 4 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #318,659
@previous (I)
> and are trying to use democratic methods to achieve their aims because they are cowards.
Well clearly you are anti-democracy. Of course you could never see it my way.
> and are trying to use democratic methods to achieve their aims because they are cowards.
Well clearly you are anti-democracy. Of course you could never see it my way.
Killer Letruce !!iNo3FkiZx replied with this 14 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #318,661
@318,654 (I)
It's funny because democratic means won't work either, because self-determination.
Literally all they can do now is resort to retard tactics like this.
It's funny because democratic means won't work either, because self-determination.
Literally all they can do now is resort to retard tactics like this.
(Edited 1 minute later.)
Anonymous I replied with this 14 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #318,665
@318,659 (G)
I dont believe you know anything. I think you are just a troll.
Anyone with any sense would support a british claim to the falklands.
I dont believe you know anything. I think you are just a troll.
Anyone with any sense would support a british claim to the falklands.
Anonymous G replied with this 14 years ago, 47 seconds later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #318,667
Anonymous F replied with this 14 years ago, 14 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #318,672
@previous (G)
See the thing is, Argentinians honestly believe the rest of the world is as guillable and stupid as they are.
The Argentine government truly thinks the world can be suckered into supporting them on this under the guise of stamping out colonialism. By their estimation, we're all too stupid to realize Argentinian control of the islands would violate the principle of self-determination, which is the whole basis for rejecting colonialism in the first place.
If that's not a stupid and arrogant position, I don't know what is.
See the thing is, Argentinians honestly believe the rest of the world is as guillable and stupid as they are.
The Argentine government truly thinks the world can be suckered into supporting them on this under the guise of stamping out colonialism. By their estimation, we're all too stupid to realize Argentinian control of the islands would violate the principle of self-determination, which is the whole basis for rejecting colonialism in the first place.
If that's not a stupid and arrogant position, I don't know what is.
(Edited 18 seconds later.)
Anonymous G replied with this 14 years ago, 19 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #318,675
@previous (F)
> control of the islands would violate the principle of self-determination, which is the whole basis for rejecting colonialism in the first place.
From what I see the Brits keep using the Self-Determination argument & that is a good argument. Now as an outsider, I would have to point out Ireland. If the same argument were valid? Then the Catholics vs Protestants and those (lets call them troubles) would have never become such an issue. Ireland would be 100% free and sovereign.
> control of the islands would violate the principle of self-determination, which is the whole basis for rejecting colonialism in the first place.
From what I see the Brits keep using the Self-Determination argument & that is a good argument. Now as an outsider, I would have to point out Ireland. If the same argument were valid? Then the Catholics vs Protestants and those (lets call them troubles) would have never become such an issue. Ireland would be 100% free and sovereign.
Anonymous I replied with this 14 years ago, 4 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #318,677
@previous (G)
Thebfalkland islanders consider themselves british and dont want argentinian control. That is all that matters
Thebfalkland islanders consider themselves british and dont want argentinian control. That is all that matters
Anonymous M joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #318,680
As a resident of The Falkland Islands I feel oppressed by the British occupation. All we want is freedom and the ability to make decisions for ourselves. Everyone I know wants to be a part of Argentina. We are all Argentineans first. The British must leave. We have suffered at their hands for far too long.
Anonymous G replied with this 14 years ago, 15 seconds later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #318,681
Killer Letruce !!iNo3FkiZx replied with this 14 years ago, 33 seconds later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #318,682
Anonymous M replied with this 14 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #318,683
@previous (Killer Letruce !!iNo3FkiZx)
You don't agree with what I say because it does not fit in with your views. This is the typical British attitude and humiliating ways we are all forced to endure.
You don't agree with what I say because it does not fit in with your views. This is the typical British attitude and humiliating ways we are all forced to endure.
Anonymous F replied with this 14 years ago, 0 seconds later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #318,684
@318,675 (G)
You're attacking the character of the entiny making the arguement. That has no bearing on wheter the arguement is correct or not. They needn't be consistint in their position to be right on this particular issue.
Besides a whole shitload of Nothren Irish insist on beign called British. Perhaps not a majority, but pretty damn close.
You're attacking the character of the entiny making the arguement. That has no bearing on wheter the arguement is correct or not. They needn't be consistint in their position to be right on this particular issue.
Besides a whole shitload of Nothren Irish insist on beign called British. Perhaps not a majority, but pretty damn close.
Anonymous F double-posted this 14 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #318,685
Anonymous M replied with this 14 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #318,686
@previous (F)
We have to be resourceful as the British occupiers have cut off out communication with the outside world.
We have to be resourceful as the British occupiers have cut off out communication with the outside world.
Anonymous I replied with this 14 years ago, 3 seconds later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #318,687
Anonymous G replied with this 14 years ago, 21 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #318,689
@318,684 (F)
lolonono
> Besides a whole shitload of Nothren Irish insist on beign called British. Perhaps not a majority, but pretty damn close.
?
In modern democratic society's, all that is required is a VOTE So simple yet such never happened.
@previous (I)
If the argument Brits use re Falklands is Self-Determination then why did the Brits overlook setting up elections so the Island of Ireland could decide for themselves?
What was so hard about that?
Hell Oil was not even an issue for Ireland.
lolonono
> Besides a whole shitload of Nothren Irish insist on beign called British. Perhaps not a majority, but pretty damn close.
?
In modern democratic society's, all that is required is a VOTE So simple yet such never happened.
@previous (I)
If the argument Brits use re Falklands is Self-Determination then why did the Brits overlook setting up elections so the Island of Ireland could decide for themselves?
What was so hard about that?
Hell Oil was not even an issue for Ireland.
Anonymous F replied with this 14 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #318,690
Anonymous G replied with this 14 years ago, 11 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #318,693
@previous (F)
I am not derailing the thread!
> Topic: After all these years, Argentina are STILL butthurt over the Falklands.
Thread moves in direction of
> self-determination
To justify why Falklands remains British.
I point out if that were true then Ireland would also have been judged by the same thing.
Of course for that to be true it would require elections on both Islands. After all perhaps the Irish might have voted for British domination?
lolonono
I am not derailing the thread!
> Topic: After all these years, Argentina are STILL butthurt over the Falklands.
Thread moves in direction of
> self-determination
To justify why Falklands remains British.
I point out if that were true then Ireland would also have been judged by the same thing.
Of course for that to be true it would require elections on both Islands. After all perhaps the Irish might have voted for British domination?
lolonono
Anonymous M replied with this 14 years ago, 4 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #318,694
@previous (G)
As a resident of the Falkland Islands, I can sympathize with this. I agree with you, friend.
As a resident of the Falkland Islands, I can sympathize with this. I agree with you, friend.
(Edited 38 seconds later.)
Anonymous M double-posted this 14 years ago, 4 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #318,695
@318,690 (F)
As a resident of the Falkland Islands I can say that he isn't trying to derail anything.
As a resident of the Falkland Islands I can say that he isn't trying to derail anything.
Resident of the Falklands replied with this 14 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #318,697
@previous (M)
I am a TRUE AND HONEST resident of the Falklands. I can confirm that this person doesn't live here.
I am a TRUE AND HONEST resident of the Falklands. I can confirm that this person doesn't live here.
Anonymous G replied with this 14 years ago, 10 seconds later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #318,698
@318,694 (M)
Assuming lolol that you really live in the Falklands, would you vote to be with Argentina or Britannia?
Edit: Men of Falklands would be too busy fucking the Sheep & have no time for MC
Assuming lolol that you really live in the Falklands, would you vote to be with Argentina or Britannia?
Edit: Men of Falklands would be too busy fucking the Sheep & have no time for MC
(Edited 2 minutes later.)
Anonymous M replied with this 14 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #318,701
@previous (G)
As a resident of the Falkland Islands I can say I would vote to be part of Argentina because it's closer.
@318,697 (Resident of the Falklands)
As a resident of the Falkland Islands I can say you are lying.
As a resident of the Falkland Islands I can say I would vote to be part of Argentina because it's closer.
@318,697 (Resident of the Falklands)
As a resident of the Falkland Islands I can say you are lying.
Anonymous G replied with this 14 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #318,703
@previous (M)
Good luck getting that vote because as you well know that sure did not work for those poor oppressed people of Ireland. They are still forced to get down on their knees and kiss the Queens hand.
Good luck getting that vote because as you well know that sure did not work for those poor oppressed people of Ireland. They are still forced to get down on their knees and kiss the Queens hand.
Anonymous M replied with this 14 years ago, 18 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #318,715
@previous (G)
As a resident of the Falkland Islands I can say that I've never kissed the queen's hand.
As a resident of the Falkland Islands I can say that I've never kissed the queen's hand.
Anonymous G replied with this 14 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #318,717
Anonymous M replied with this 14 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #318,718
Anonymous N joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 1 hour later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #318,734
Anonymous G replied with this 14 years ago, 40 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #318,738
@previous (N)
lolo
I do notice that the moment I agree with the Brits about why they should retain the Falklands (because self-determination.) and then mention Ireland in the same context - Brits get somewhat lowcow mean and ugly.
Dare mention self rule for Ireland to any Brit and their bowels open wide & they soil themselves with anger.
lolo
I do notice that the moment I agree with the Brits about why they should retain the Falklands (because self-determination.) and then mention Ireland in the same context - Brits get somewhat lowcow mean and ugly.
Dare mention self rule for Ireland to any Brit and their bowels open wide & they soil themselves with anger.
(Edited 27 seconds later.)
Anonymous I replied with this 14 years ago, 47 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #318,742
@318,689 (G)
That amkes no sense. All the falkland islanders are british and want to remain so.
What is your point exactly?
That amkes no sense. All the falkland islanders are british and want to remain so.
What is your point exactly?
Resident of the Falklands replied with this 14 years ago, 11 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #318,743
Anonymous G replied with this 14 years ago, 17 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #318,745
@318,742 (I)
Wiki says 70% are British. I imagine most want to remain so.
Of course when the Brits pulled off the land grab of the Falklands and filled it with Brits, they stacked the deck.
Irish in Ireland, we all know how the majority of the Irish feel about the British lolol.
Perhaps the Brits will wake up one day as they did when they turned over India to the Native population.
We could discuss Egypt - Sudan - on and on lolo. Brits are Infamous for Imperialism/Colonialism. Bugger land grabbers. London has over 600,000 Muslims and a peaceful lot they are lolo. UK Karma lolol
You know what my point is.
Wiki says 70% are British. I imagine most want to remain so.
Of course when the Brits pulled off the land grab of the Falklands and filled it with Brits, they stacked the deck.
Irish in Ireland, we all know how the majority of the Irish feel about the British lolol.
Perhaps the Brits will wake up one day as they did when they turned over India to the Native population.
We could discuss Egypt - Sudan - on and on lolo. Brits are Infamous for Imperialism/Colonialism. Bugger land grabbers. London has over 600,000 Muslims and a peaceful lot they are lolo. UK Karma lolol
You know what my point is.
Resident of the Falklands replied with this 14 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #318,746
Anonymous G replied with this 14 years ago, 4 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #318,749
@previous (Resident of the Falklands)
Brits would not waste a satellite on the Falklands. New war ships prone to sinking by one French missile, Yes!
Brits would not waste a satellite on the Falklands. New war ships prone to sinking by one French missile, Yes!
Resident of the Falklands replied with this 14 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #318,750
@previous (G)
whoa dude i was just referencing your older schtick as a joke
and you already said that
whoa dude i was just referencing your older schtick as a joke
and you already said that
Anonymous G replied with this 14 years ago, 10 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #318,753
@previous (Resident of the Falklands)?
Sorry yet I am sorry I wasn't in England after the war ships sunk. The lutz lolol.
Anonymous G double-posted this 14 years ago, 6 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #318,754
Why did the Black Watch bring back so many sheep from the Falkland Islands?
War brides.
War brides.
Anonymous F replied with this 14 years ago, 4 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #318,770
@318,753 (G)
So Britian lost a ship. Big deal. Argentina went from the most economically prosperous in South America to a bankrupt shithole. Their economy's still in the shitter thanks to this little stunt.
So Britian lost a ship. Big deal. Argentina went from the most economically prosperous in South America to a bankrupt shithole. Their economy's still in the shitter thanks to this little stunt.
Anonymous O joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 31 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #318,775
Anonymous I replied with this 14 years ago, 8 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #318,817
@318,745 (G)
The majority of people in Northern Ireland want to remain British. Also, the Irish Republic doesnt want to take on the economic lame duck that is Northern Ireland.
You really dont know what you are talking about.
The majority of people in Northern Ireland want to remain British. Also, the Irish Republic doesnt want to take on the economic lame duck that is Northern Ireland.
You really dont know what you are talking about.
Anonymous P joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 3 hours later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #318,835
Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx replied with this 14 years ago, 9 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #318,839
> 100
Anonymous G replied with this 14 years ago, 2 hours later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #318,880
@318,775 (O)
According to Wiki
Northern Ireland population 1,685,000, constituting about 30% of the island's total population and about 3% of the population of the United Kingdom.
Republic of Ireland occupying about five-sixths of the island of Ireland. The population was 4.58 million in 2011.
I leave it to you to praise the Provisional Irish Republican Army, for their fight for democracy & failure against the colonialism of British, with a larger oppressive army.
According to Wiki
Northern Ireland population 1,685,000, constituting about 30% of the island's total population and about 3% of the population of the United Kingdom.
Republic of Ireland occupying about five-sixths of the island of Ireland. The population was 4.58 million in 2011.
I leave it to you to praise the Provisional Irish Republican Army, for their fight for democracy & failure against the colonialism of British, with a larger oppressive army.
Anonymous O replied with this 14 years ago, 1 hour later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #318,885
@previous (G)
Look. Northern Ireland was free to join either the Union or Eire. They chose, democratically, to join the Union. Just because terrorists PIRA and RIRA wanted it otherwise does not mean anything.
Look. Northern Ireland was free to join either the Union or Eire. They chose, democratically, to join the Union. Just because terrorists PIRA and RIRA wanted it otherwise does not mean anything.
Anonymous G replied with this 14 years ago, 16 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #318,887
@previous (O)
lolonono
Of course the Brits on the Island chose to remain Brits. As part & parcel of the inbreed colonialism, such is to be expected.
Variations of IRA freedom fighters only aim -> was to butthurt Brits.
lolonono
Of course the Brits on the Island chose to remain Brits. As part & parcel of the inbreed colonialism, such is to be expected.
Variations of IRA freedom fighters only aim -> was to butthurt Brits.
Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx replied with this 14 years ago, 25 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #318,890
@previous (G)
So you're saying that there were more English people in Northern island than Irish people, and they skewed the vote? I'm pretty sure that's WRONG, Syntax.
So you're saying that there were more English people in Northern island than Irish people, and they skewed the vote? I'm pretty sure that's WRONG, Syntax.
Anonymous G replied with this 14 years ago, 15 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #318,894
@previous (Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx)
"Northern Ireland population 1,685,000, constituting about 30% of the island's total population and about 3% of the population of the United Kingdom.
Republic of Ireland occupying about five-sixths of the island of Ireland. The population was 4.58 million in 2011."
So after Brits used the big guns on Republic of Ireland ramming colonialism up their buttholes.
"The 1998 Agreement was ratified by two referendums in both parts of Ireland, including an acceptance by the Republic that its claim to Northern Ireland_would only be achieved by persuasion and peaceful means._ This was an important part of the Northern Ireland peace process that has been under way since 1993."
There it stands. Mainland Brits gave up India and much of wrongfully obtained possessions & one day perhaps when the Indians in London/UK overwhelm the Brits, Ireland may one day be a Free Ireland.
Oh and lets not forget the Falkland Islands. So far removed from Britannia, yet colonialism is King/Queen there.
"Northern Ireland population 1,685,000, constituting about 30% of the island's total population and about 3% of the population of the United Kingdom.
Republic of Ireland occupying about five-sixths of the island of Ireland. The population was 4.58 million in 2011."
So after Brits used the big guns on Republic of Ireland ramming colonialism up their buttholes.
"The 1998 Agreement was ratified by two referendums in both parts of Ireland, including an acceptance by the Republic that its claim to Northern Ireland
There it stands. Mainland Brits gave up India and much of wrongfully obtained possessions & one day perhaps when the Indians in London/UK overwhelm the Brits, Ireland may one day be a Free Ireland.
Oh and lets not forget the Falkland Islands. So far removed from Britannia, yet colonialism is King/Queen there.
(Edited 2 minutes later.)
Anonymous O replied with this 14 years ago, 29 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #318,898
Anonymous Q joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 1 hour later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #318,913
@318,887 (G)
@318,894 (G)
This thread is about Argentian and Britian, thanks. Ireland is not involved in the Falklands conflict, nor in the making of this ad.
Stay on topic assholes.
@318,894 (G)
This thread is about Argentian and Britian, thanks. Ireland is not involved in the Falklands conflict, nor in the making of this ad.
Stay on topic assholes.
Anonymous G replied with this 14 years ago, 11 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #318,919
@previous (Q)
> This thread is about Argentian and Britian, thanks. Ireland is not involved in the Falklands conflict, nor in the making of this ad.
Wot? You mean all of a sudden Ireland is not a part of Britain? Praise the Lord
OK so now back to the ad.
> Britain has criticised Argentina for broadcasting a television advertisement referring to the Falkland Islands as "Argentinian soil",
The Falklands are Argentinian Soil that by Imperialism/Colonialism/LandGrab/ of & by Britannia.
Does that getting back to the ad please you?
> This thread is about Argentian and Britian, thanks. Ireland is not involved in the Falklands conflict, nor in the making of this ad.
Wot? You mean all of a sudden Ireland is not a part of Britain? Praise the Lord
OK so now back to the ad.
> Britain has criticised Argentina for broadcasting a television advertisement referring to the Falkland Islands as "Argentinian soil",
The Falklands are Argentinian Soil that by Imperialism/Colonialism/LandGrab/ of & by Britannia.
Does that getting back to the ad please you?
Anonymous E replied with this 14 years ago, 4 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #318,923
Now you're just stupid. Argentinians are useless. They don't even make good housekeepers. Siding with them over the British is political suicide.
The ad is beyond cunty in that is doesn't show a single Falklander, as if they don't exist. You know why that is right, it's because they're not Argentinian.
The ad is beyond cunty in that is doesn't show a single Falklander, as if they don't exist. You know why that is right, it's because they're not Argentinian.
(Edited 2 minutes later.)
Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx replied with this 14 years ago, 3 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #318,930
@318,919 (G)
> The Falklands are Argentinian Soil
No, they're British because the inhabitants want to be British. You already agreed that self-determination means they should stay British.
Syntax, bro, you're going in circles here.
> The Falklands are Argentinian Soil
No, they're British because the inhabitants want to be British. You already agreed that self-determination means they should stay British.
Syntax, bro, you're going in circles here.
Anonymous G replied with this 14 years ago, 10 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #318,933
@318,923 (E)
Not siding with them over Brits. As for useless?
Now to be 100% honest I was unaware of what Argentina has done for technology until this search.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argentina#Science_and_technology
My only axe to grind is wots fair is fair. French ripped off the world with Imperialism/Colonialism/LandGrab/
USA the same
Britannia the same.
French currently have butthurt over Mideast bad Karma coming back to haunt them.
Britain the same over India & Africa.
USA built on the backs of African Slaves and Chinese slaves and the rip off of Mexico. Well Mexico is getting back at USA by breeding far more USA citizens and one day may win back what the USA wrongfully took from them.
Not siding with them over Brits. As for useless?
Now to be 100% honest I was unaware of what Argentina has done for technology until this search.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argentina#Science_and_technology
My only axe to grind is wots fair is fair. French ripped off the world with Imperialism/Colonialism/LandGrab/
USA the same
Britannia the same.
French currently have butthurt over Mideast bad Karma coming back to haunt them.
Britain the same over India & Africa.
USA built on the backs of African Slaves and Chinese slaves and the rip off of Mexico. Well Mexico is getting back at USA by breeding far more USA citizens and one day may win back what the USA wrongfully took from them.
Anonymous G double-posted this 14 years ago, 5 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #318,934
@318,930 (Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx)
I put that up because someone said the topic is about the Ad! That line is the butthurt Brits have over the Ad!
No circle because again if you apply self determination to the Falklands, why not apply it to the Island of Ireland?
Republic of Ireland only put down the arms because of oppression & occupation by Brits. Brits with more guns more army. Not because they wanted to be British lolol.
So Killer Lettuce why is it Brits gave India back to India. Why South Africa and a long list of places back to the proper people?
Why do Brits hold on to the Falklands? Why did Brits build a Missile destroyer that was sunk by one single French Missile? Wots up with that?
I put that up because someone said the topic is about the Ad! That line is the butthurt Brits have over the Ad!
No circle because again if you apply self determination to the Falklands, why not apply it to the Island of Ireland?
Republic of Ireland only put down the arms because of oppression & occupation by Brits. Brits with more guns more army. Not because they wanted to be British lolol.
So Killer Lettuce why is it Brits gave India back to India. Why South Africa and a long list of places back to the proper people?
Why do Brits hold on to the Falklands? Why did Brits build a Missile destroyer that was sunk by one single French Missile? Wots up with that?
Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx replied with this 14 years ago, 8 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #318,937
@previous (G)
Why do you keep bringing up the missile? What does that have to do with the issue of who owns the Falklands?
Besides, I could point out how Argentina's armed forces lost much more than the British forces did. They came out worse.
Why do you keep bringing up the missile? What does that have to do with the issue of who owns the Falklands?
Besides, I could point out how Argentina's armed forces lost much more than the British forces did. They came out worse.
Anonymous G replied with this 14 years ago, 7 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #318,939
@previous (Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx)
Why? The lutz of course.
Why do you avoid telling me how you justify Brits & French & USA Imperialism/Colonialism/LandGrab/
I should have included USA & partners who gangbanged Iraq.
Out of here for fun in the sun. I will look for Killer Lettuce to fess up over why Imperialism/Colonialism/LandGrab/
is a righteous thing.
Hey French have just Voted & gone Commie lololol
Why? The lutz of course.
Why do you avoid telling me how you justify Brits & French & USA Imperialism/Colonialism/LandGrab/
I should have included USA & partners who gangbanged Iraq.
Out of here for fun in the sun. I will look for Killer Lettuce to fess up over why Imperialism/Colonialism/LandGrab/
is a righteous thing.
Hey French have just Voted & gone Commie lololol
Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx replied with this 14 years ago, 16 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #318,945
@previous (G)We've already been over all that colonialism stuff, Syntax. No point in having the same conversation twice
Anonymous E replied with this 14 years ago, 4 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #318,948
@318,933 (G)
wots fair is fair. Are you fucking kidding me?
Argentina conducted genocide in Patagonia. Fair would be to nuke the shit out of Buenos Aries.
wots fair is fair. Are you fucking kidding me?
Argentina conducted genocide in Patagonia. Fair would be to nuke the shit out of Buenos Aries.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 14 years ago, 6 days later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #320,817
