Minichan

Topic: /r/ing more photographs of Mistie Atkinson

Dr Bumhert started this discussion 14 years ago #19,316

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2137926/Mother-Mistie-Atkinson-sex-tape-son-16-sent-naked-photos-herself.html

Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 4 minutes later[^] [v] #317,957

If the bible is correct, WE all are products of Incest.

Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 11 seconds later, 5 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #317,958

This is a little sexy, isnt it? I'm not judging, I like weird things too.

Anonymous B replied with this 14 years ago, 39 seconds later, 5 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #317,959

@previous (C)
kook will love it.

Dr Bumhert (OP) replied with this 14 years ago, 41 seconds later, 6 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #317,960

She was only 32!

Anonymous C replied with this 14 years ago, 1 minute later, 8 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #317,961

@317,959 (B)
kook saw this yesterday.

Anonymous B replied with this 14 years ago, 3 minutes later, 11 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #317,962

Image went missing"A law enforcement source told the New York Daily News that Mistie Atkinson had not had contact with her now 16-year-old son for 15 years, but contacted him last year through Facebook.

This is all Facebook's fault!

(Edited 1 minute later.)

Anonymous C replied with this 14 years ago, 41 seconds later, 11 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #317,963

@previous (B)
they should advertise all motels in this manner. lololol

Dr Bumhert (OP) replied with this 14 years ago, 2 days later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #318,778

bump

Anonymous B replied with this 14 years ago, 4 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #318,780

@previous (Dr Bumhert)
no new pics?

kook !nH6RAuX8mo replied with this 14 years ago, 7 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #318,783

I did see this. women tend to be the people who creep on their children, after not raising them.

Anonymous B replied with this 14 years ago, 3 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #318,784

Image went missing@previous (kook !nH6RAuX8mo)

kook !nH6RAuX8mo replied with this 14 years ago, 22 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #318,787

@previous (B)
yes.

Dr Bumhert (OP) replied with this 14 years ago, 7 hours later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #318,818

I want videos!

kook !nH6RAuX8mo replied with this 14 years ago, 3 hours later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #318,833

@previous (Dr Bumhert)
Stop, lol. No you don't.

Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 58 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #318,846

OP is a closet statist.

Dr Bumhert (OP) replied with this 14 years ago, 8 hours later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #318,969

@318,833 (kook !nH6RAuX8mo)
I really do.

kook !nH6RAuX8mo replied with this 14 years ago, 6 minutes later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #318,971

@previous (Dr Bumhert)
Is this your thing?

Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx replied with this 14 years ago, 1 minute later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #318,972

> Daily Mail

Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 13 minutes later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #318,973

@318,971 (kook !nH6RAuX8mo)
Might be awhile before OP gets back to you.

kook !nH6RAuX8mo replied with this 14 years ago, 3 minutes later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #318,974

@previous (E)
why is that?

Anonymous E replied with this 14 years ago, 25 seconds later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #318,975

@previous (kook !nH6RAuX8mo)
Vacation
:

Please familiarise yourself with the rules and markup syntax before posting.