Topic: Dubstep...

HaikerensGuide !0VegJ9Jl.Q started this discussion 14 years ago #19,235

...is the audio version of YouTube Poop.

Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 4 minutes later[^] [v] #316,615

dubstep is death metal for robots

Falco !PZmcClOUDk joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 3 minutes later, 7 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #316,626

I'm glad you watched that poop

dreamworks joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 3 minutes later, 11 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #316,634

interesting thread

HaikerensGuide !0VegJ9Jl.Q (OP) replied with this 14 years ago, 3 minutes later, 14 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #316,641

@316,626 (Falco !PZmcClOUDk)
I was there during the triumvirate of WalrusGuy, KroboProductions and Deepercutt...

Falco !PZmcClOUDk replied with this 14 years ago, 47 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #316,692

@previous (HaikerensGuide !0VegJ9Jl.Q)
Me too. And Nintendobrad.

HaikerensGuide !0VegJ9Jl.Q (OP) replied with this 14 years ago, 22 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #316,704

@previous (Falco !PZmcClOUDk)
oh fuck
i miss the fads
at lest we get the dubstep mlg montages\
like this
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d76pvstQM4M

Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 5 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #316,706

youtube poop is a form of trolling
dubstep is noise polution

Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 53 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #316,757

Dubstep is shitty trance without the soul of house or the balls of progressive.

Falco !PZmcClOUDk replied with this 14 years ago, 4 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #316,763

@previous (F)
Trance? No.

It has the edge of electro house without the bounce. Or fun.

Anonymous B replied with this 14 years ago, 2 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #316,764

@previous (Falco !PZmcClOUDk)
falco: expert electronica expert all up in this motherfucker

Anonymous F replied with this 14 years ago, 9 hours later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #316,861

@316,763 (Falco !PZmcClOUDk)
I was thinking more of vocal trance, so you may be right. I suppose that's closer to electro house than actual trance.

HaikerensGuide !0VegJ9Jl.Q (OP) replied with this 14 years ago, 5 hours later, 17 hours after the original post[^] [v] #316,918

@316,757 (F)

> Dubstep was shitty trance without the soul of house or the balls of progressive.
Now it's just WUB WUB LETS PARTY BRO BITCRUSH

Dr Bumhert joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 6 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #317,147

wahhh it's popular i hate it!

Anonymous H joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 1 hour later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #317,269

@previous (Dr Bumhert)
ITT: Hipsters rage against one of the very things they've helped to make popular. Hipsters are giant cannibal shrimp.

Anonymous B replied with this 14 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #317,271

@previous (H)
wiser words have never been spoken by anonymous h

HaikerensGuide !0VegJ9Jl.Q (OP) replied with this 14 years ago, 5 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #317,523

@317,147 (Dr Bumhert)
> implying the amount of people who like it changes the fact that brostep is objectively bad

Dr Bumhert replied with this 14 years ago, 5 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #317,594

@previous (HaikerensGuide !0VegJ9Jl.Q)
I am the sole arbiter of art and beauty! My subjective opinions are objective truth!

brie !OudrPWaUDQ joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #317,596

@317,269 (H)

> ITT: Hipsters rage against one of the very things they've helped to make popular. Hipsters are giant cannibal shrimp.

Anonymous J joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #317,599

@317,594 (Dr Bumhert)
There's no such thing as objective beauty. You're confusing collective agreements with objective truth. People agree on lies all the time.

Dr Bumhert replied with this 14 years ago, 32 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #317,612

@previous (J)
<--- I bet you have this conversation often.

Anonymous J replied with this 14 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #317,619

@previous (Dr Bumhert)
Wrong. I like beards, chest hair, and 9 inch cocks. Yes I suck cocks, and I encourage you to do so yourself so you too might find the objective beauty in doing so.

(Edited 21 seconds later.)

Dr Bumhert replied with this 14 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #317,629

@previous (J)

Anonymous J replied with this 14 years ago, 33 seconds later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #317,630

@previous (Dr Bumhert)
fap fap fap

Dr Bumhert replied with this 14 years ago, 6 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #317,646

@previous (J)
So, anyway, I was being sarcastic.

Anonymous J replied with this 14 years ago, 6 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #317,664

@previous (Dr Bumhert)
And I was making a valid point which you choose to shit on rather than concede. Hence my comment about the objective beauty in sucking cock.

Of course, I assumed you were straight, which might be a stretch.

Dr Bumhert replied with this 14 years ago, 18 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #317,691

@previous (J)
Your point was that I was confusing two concepts, which I was not. Your point was not valid.

Anonymous J replied with this 14 years ago, 33 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #317,714

@previous (Dr Bumhert)
But neither was yours. Your sarcasm was illegitimate. Mine was not.

Dr Bumhert replied with this 14 years ago, 6 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #317,931

@previous (J)
My point was that I had not confused the concepts, and was valid.

Minichan