Topic: Two burglars dead after breaking into the home of two Marines
HaikerensGuide !0VegJ9Jl.Q started this discussion 14 years ago #19,217
Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 2 minutes later[^] [v] #316,248
This is an injustice of the highest degree! Two highly trained killing machines murdered these two proud African American gentlemen. Somebody had better call Al Sharpton on this one, we cannot let these racists continue to terrorize the black community.
r04r !GETFUCKED joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 2 minutes later, 5 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #316,249
Provide an opinion and ground for discussion instead of just a link.
Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 6 seconds later, 5 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #316,250
@316,248 (B)
Ya all have it wrong. This was just a case of simple suicide by cops only in this case it was Marines.
The two burglars were sick of living and begged to be killed.
Ya all have it wrong. This was just a case of simple suicide by cops only in this case it was Marines.
The two burglars were sick of living and begged to be killed.
Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 1 minute later, 6 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #316,251
@316,248 (B)
These poor victims were no doubt offed because they discovered evidence of a secret love affair that the soldiers did not want made public. It's just the latest example of white hypocrisy keeping the black man down.
These poor victims were no doubt offed because they discovered evidence of a secret love affair that the soldiers did not want made public. It's just the latest example of white hypocrisy keeping the black man down.
Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 6 minutes later, 12 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #316,253
HaikerensGuide !0VegJ9Jl.Q (OP) replied with this 14 years ago, 1 minute later, 14 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #316,254
r04r !GETFUCKED replied with this 14 years ago, 1 minute later, 15 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #316,255
@previous (HaikerensGuide !0VegJ9Jl.Q)
That is outside my control, it's the cloudflare CDN like I've explained you multiple times. Complain with those guys that they're marking your ip ranges as bad, or you're doing something to set them off.
That is outside my control, it's the cloudflare CDN like I've explained you multiple times. Complain with those guys that they're marking your ip ranges as bad, or you're doing something to set them off.
HaikerensGuide !0VegJ9Jl.Q (OP) replied with this 14 years ago, 6 minutes later, 21 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #316,256
@previous (r04r !GETFUCKED)
> That is outside my control
Bullshit. Just disable the fucking anti-hotlinking feature or use a different hotlink preventer.
> it's the cloudflare CDN like I've explained you multiple times. Complain with those guys that they're marking your ip ranges as bad
Right. How come Minichan is the only site that gives me this shit? Even 4chan doesn't.
> That is outside my control
Bullshit. Just disable the fucking anti-hotlinking feature or use a different hotlink preventer.
> it's the cloudflare CDN like I've explained you multiple times. Complain with those guys that they're marking your ip ranges as bad
Right. How come Minichan is the only site that gives me this shit? Even 4chan doesn't.
Anonymous B replied with this 14 years ago, 1 minute later, 23 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #316,258
What is static.minichan.org?
Anonymous F replied with this 14 years ago, 1 minute later, 24 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #316,260
Anonymous D replied with this 14 years ago, 3 minutes later, 27 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #316,261
@316,254 (HaikerensGuide !0VegJ9Jl.Q)
er now you need to rethink what you just asked for from MC. You seem to be the one with an over active dynamic IP. Servers for web sites such as MC must have a STATIC IP or otherwise you could not resolve the IP via a router. Yes the IP will have a very small range, yetthe head end router at the server treats YOU to what looks like just one single IP. Its as static as static can be.
My English ain't so good - MC has a Static IP. You on the other hand have a mess of IP's and the cookie you get from MC - Well its your cookies fault not MC for not liking your cookie.
er now you need to rethink what you just asked for from MC. You seem to be the one with an over active dynamic IP. Servers for web sites such as MC must have a STATIC IP or otherwise you could not resolve the IP via a router. Yes the IP will have a very small range, yet
My English ain't so good - MC has a Static IP. You on the other hand have a mess of IP's and the cookie you get from MC - Well its your cookies fault not MC for not liking your cookie.
(Edited 59 seconds later.)
HaikerensGuide !0VegJ9Jl.Q (OP) replied with this 14 years ago, 13 minutes later, 41 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #316,262
@previous (D)
What the fuck are you on about? Quit trying to piss me off with your illogical bullshit.
What the fuck are you on about? Quit trying to piss me off with your illogical bullshit.
Anonymous D replied with this 14 years ago, 58 seconds later, 42 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #316,263
@316,254 (HaikerensGuide !0VegJ9Jl.Q)
Just occurred to me - VPN - Hit the web and look up VPN - Itamake was even pushing one that was free and he and others used it on TC.
I just looked and Cnet shows a free VPN and ads show real cheep $3.75/month for a commercial service.
@previous (HaikerensGuide !0VegJ9Jl.Q)
Not trying/wanting to piss you off. Just help you understand that the problem is on your end nor can you expect MC to fix it for you. As Becky said she has no control over it. Not unless so many people had your problem and then frankly a solution to it is available but it opens MC up to DOS/SPAM etc attacks.
Just occurred to me - VPN - Hit the web and look up VPN - Itamake was even pushing one that was free and he and others used it on TC.
I just looked and Cnet shows a free VPN and ads show real cheep $3.75/month for a commercial service.
@previous (HaikerensGuide !0VegJ9Jl.Q)
Not trying/wanting to piss you off. Just help you understand that the problem is on your end nor can you expect MC to fix it for you. As Becky said she has no control over it. Not unless so many people had your problem and then frankly a solution to it is available but it opens MC up to DOS/SPAM etc attacks.
(Edited 3 minutes later.)
Anonymous G joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 3 hours later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #316,285
r04r !GETFUCKED replied with this 14 years ago, 7 hours later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #316,340
@316,256 (HaikerensGuide !0VegJ9Jl.Q)
I'm not going to disable a perfectly good feature just because you molest your browser into not sending important web headers (Referral header, in this case it seems). I do not fucking care because you bring this upon yourself. Noone else has this problem, and you're the kind of person who messes with things such as noscript and disabling referral headers FOR PRIVACY without fully understanding them. If you've done all of the following, and ask nicely, I might maybe just care a little bit about a problem that only your rude pathetic little self:
- Enable javacript
- Get rid of NoScript or completely whitelist *.minichan.org and minichan.org
- Enable referral headers in your browser
- Revert any other changes your incompetent little brain thought would be a good idea and get rid of any "privacy enhancement" extensions.
After that, if the problems persist, I might care. A little bit. Maybe.
I'm not going to disable a perfectly good feature just because you molest your browser into not sending important web headers (Referral header, in this case it seems). I do not fucking care because you bring this upon yourself. Noone else has this problem, and you're the kind of person who messes with things such as noscript and disabling referral headers FOR PRIVACY without fully understanding them. If you've done all of the following, and ask nicely, I might maybe just care a little bit about a problem that only your rude pathetic little self:
- Enable javacript
- Get rid of NoScript or completely whitelist *.minichan.org and minichan.org
- Enable referral headers in your browser
- Revert any other changes your incompetent little brain thought would be a good idea and get rid of any "privacy enhancement" extensions.
After that, if the problems persist, I might care. A little bit. Maybe.
(Edited 35 seconds later.)
Anonymous H joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 20 minutes later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #316,342
@316,251 (E)
> implying everyone doesn't already know marines make great blow buddies.
But we all wink and keep our mouths shut, cause you know, they're fucking Marines!
Also, inb4 Obama claims these men look like his non-existent sons.
> implying everyone doesn't already know marines make great blow buddies.
But we all wink and keep our mouths shut, cause you know, they're fucking Marines!
Also, inb4 Obama claims these men look like his non-existent sons.
(Edited 2 minutes later.)
Anonymous D replied with this 14 years ago, 2 hours later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #316,361
@316,340 (r04r !GETFUCKED)
I use both ad block & no script. On no script its as simple as telling no script to "Allow all this page"
One time in computers life time.
Ad block? I love the feature yet now after using it without any problems - used it a few days ago on Rotten Tomatoes to get rid of a nagging request to add Me to Facebook. Blocked that sucker and now have to dive into how to get RID of my request. It messes up the whole page (i found a work around)
Add ons for browsers...Super but they come at a price!
I use both ad block & no script. On no script its as simple as telling no script to "Allow all this page"
One time in computers life time.
Ad block? I love the feature yet now after using it without any problems - used it a few days ago on Rotten Tomatoes to get rid of a nagging request to add Me to Facebook. Blocked that sucker and now have to dive into how to get RID of my request. It messes up the whole page (i found a work around)
Add ons for browsers...Super but they come at a price!
HaikerensGuide !0VegJ9Jl.Q (OP) replied with this 14 years ago, 3 hours later, 17 hours after the original post[^] [v] #316,419
@316,340 (r04r !GETFUCKED)
> I'm not going to disable a perfectly good feature just because you molest your browser into not sending important web headers (Referral header, in this case it seems).
I am running stock Opera right now, and the issue persists. I ran it in stock Google Chrome, and the issue persists. It's clearly not the add-ons (I don't even use those referral fuckers) and it's definitely not some silly change I made to the browser.
> I do not fucking care because you bring this upon yourself.
I know, right? Fuck all those Charter users over! They deserve to be punished for choosing Charter! Fuck Charter! Fuck Charter! FUck CHarter!
> Noone else has this problem, and you're the kind of person who messes with things such as noscript and disabling referral headers FOR PRIVACY without fully understanding them.
I don't use NoScript. The most notable thing I use (in Firefox) is fucking Adblock and Greasemonkey (for YousableTubefix and 4chan X). That's it.
> If you've done all of the following, and ask nicely, I might maybe just care a little bit about a problem that only your rude pathetic little self
> - Enable javacript
> - Get rid of NoScript or completely whitelist *.minichan.org and minichan.org
> - Enable referral headers in your browser
> - Revert any other changes your incompetent little brain thought would be a good idea and get rid of any "privacy enhancement" extensions.
None of that has anything to do with the problem. I was on AT&T for the longest time and the images ran fine. Only since I switched to Charter have I been getting this issue. And I have done all that troubleshooting months ago. Do you honestly think I'm that retarded as to not try and solve the problems myself before having to whine about the issue that only seems to affect Charter IPs? I have been nice about the issue months ago, and that got me nowhere at all.
> After that, if the problems persist, I might care. A little bit. Maybe.
The problem has persisted for over a month now. I have asked you countlessly to fix this issue regarding the fucking blacklist and it still persists. All because you think it has something to do with Firefox addons (I tested the issue in multiple stock browsers and it still blocks me, even with a fresh account).
> I'm not going to disable a perfectly good feature just because you molest your browser into not sending important web headers (Referral header, in this case it seems).
I am running stock Opera right now, and the issue persists. I ran it in stock Google Chrome, and the issue persists. It's clearly not the add-ons (I don't even use those referral fuckers) and it's definitely not some silly change I made to the browser.
> I do not fucking care because you bring this upon yourself.
I know, right? Fuck all those Charter users over! They deserve to be punished for choosing Charter! Fuck Charter! Fuck Charter! FUck CHarter!
> Noone else has this problem, and you're the kind of person who messes with things such as noscript and disabling referral headers FOR PRIVACY without fully understanding them.
I don't use NoScript. The most notable thing I use (in Firefox) is fucking Adblock and Greasemonkey (for YousableTubefix and 4chan X). That's it.
> If you've done all of the following, and ask nicely, I might maybe just care a little bit about a problem that only your rude pathetic little self
> - Enable javacript
> - Get rid of NoScript or completely whitelist *.minichan.org and minichan.org
> - Enable referral headers in your browser
> - Revert any other changes your incompetent little brain thought would be a good idea and get rid of any "privacy enhancement" extensions.
None of that has anything to do with the problem. I was on AT&T for the longest time and the images ran fine. Only since I switched to Charter have I been getting this issue. And I have done all that troubleshooting months ago. Do you honestly think I'm that retarded as to not try and solve the problems myself before having to whine about the issue that only seems to affect Charter IPs? I have been nice about the issue months ago, and that got me nowhere at all.
> After that, if the problems persist, I might care. A little bit. Maybe.
The problem has persisted for over a month now. I have asked you countlessly to fix this issue regarding the fucking blacklist and it still persists. All because you think it has something to do with Firefox addons (I tested the issue in multiple stock browsers and it still blocks me, even with a fresh account).
(Edited 2 minutes later.)
Anonymous D replied with this 14 years ago, 13 minutes later, 17 hours after the original post[^] [v] #316,424
@previous (HaikerensGuide !0VegJ9Jl.Q)
I was about to suggest you call Charter tech support and ask for a supervisor and ask them to look at their logs at your connection to MC. & You should do that. May take several calls and several supervisors. That said I tried a search on web re Charter
"Charter communications reviews complaints
Ouch just OUCH -
That said I have both Time Warner & Comcast here (unique situation) I use TW for fun and Comcast for work related because I do not have to pay for Comcast.
Tried the same search on TW and Comcast and of course a pile of complaints YET not of the same order as Charter.
Perhaps you will get lucky with tech support and I truly hope you luck.
I was about to suggest you call Charter tech support and ask for a supervisor and ask them to look at their logs at your connection to MC. & You should do that. May take several calls and several supervisors. That said I tried a search on web re Charter
"Charter communications reviews complaints
Ouch just OUCH -
That said I have both Time Warner & Comcast here (unique situation) I use TW for fun and Comcast for work related because I do not have to pay for Comcast.
Tried the same search on TW and Comcast and of course a pile of complaints YET not of the same order as Charter.
Perhaps you will get lucky with tech support and I truly hope you luck.
HaikerensGuide !0VegJ9Jl.Q (OP) replied with this 14 years ago, 6 minutes later, 18 hours after the original post[^] [v] #316,431
@previous (D)
> I was about to suggest you call Charter tech support and ask for a supervisor and ask them to look at their logs at your connection to MC. & You should do that. May take several calls and several supervisors.
I don't think it's a problem Charter can fix (maybe they can give me a new IP but even then...), since it's exclusive to this site.
> That said I tried a search on web re Charter
> "Charter communications reviews complaints
> Ouch just OUCH -
Charter isn't all that bad here. It's certainly better than AT&T or Comcast, as both actually enforce their shitty caps. And I hear Comcast is just a fucking nightmare with its ToC.
> That said I have both Time Warner & Comcast here (unique situation) I use TW for fun and Comcast for work related because I do not have to pay for Comcast. On the other hand, Charter cable TV is utter shit and that may be their biggest source of complaints, but that doesn't really bother me as I don't watch TV.
> I was about to suggest you call Charter tech support and ask for a supervisor and ask them to look at their logs at your connection to MC. & You should do that. May take several calls and several supervisors.
I don't think it's a problem Charter can fix (maybe they can give me a new IP but even then...), since it's exclusive to this site.
> That said I tried a search on web re Charter
> "Charter communications reviews complaints
> Ouch just OUCH -
Charter isn't all that bad here. It's certainly better than AT&T or Comcast, as both actually enforce their shitty caps. And I hear Comcast is just a fucking nightmare with its ToC.
> That said I have both Time Warner & Comcast here (unique situation) I use TW for fun and Comcast for work related because I do not have to pay for Comcast. On the other hand, Charter cable TV is utter shit and that may be their biggest source of complaints, but that doesn't really bother me as I don't watch TV.
Anonymous B replied with this 14 years ago, 2 minutes later, 18 hours after the original post[^] [v] #316,434
But what is Static.minichan?
HaikerensGuide !0VegJ9Jl.Q (OP) replied with this 14 years ago, 3 minutes later, 18 hours after the original post[^] [v] #316,439
r04r !GETFUCKED replied with this 14 years ago, 3 minutes later, 18 hours after the original post[^] [v] #316,443
@316,434 (B)
It's a cache hosted by https://www.cloudflare.com/overview. It saves us bandwidth and gets you the images faster. I do not control what they decide to block, nor do I have the login for the account we have there so I can't tweak the settings. All I know is that OP is the only one with this issue, and I don't do anything regarding charter IP addresses in my code.
@316,419 (HaikerensGuide !0VegJ9Jl.Q)
Yes, you seem like the type to just whine about something without trying to solve it yourself. See above as to why I can't help you.
It's a cache hosted by https://www.cloudflare.com/overview. It saves us bandwidth and gets you the images faster. I do not control what they decide to block, nor do I have the login for the account we have there so I can't tweak the settings. All I know is that OP is the only one with this issue, and I don't do anything regarding charter IP addresses in my code.
@316,419 (HaikerensGuide !0VegJ9Jl.Q)
Yes, you seem like the type to just whine about something without trying to solve it yourself. See above as to why I can't help you.
Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx replied with this 14 years ago, 1 minute later, 18 hours after the original post[^] [v] #316,446
HaikerensGuide !0VegJ9Jl.Q (OP) replied with this 14 years ago, 6 minutes later, 18 hours after the original post[^] [v] #316,452
@316,443 (r04r !GETFUCKED)
> I do not control what they decide to block, nor do I have the login for the account we have there so I can't tweak the settings.
And there lies what may be the problem. If you don't have access to the account, then who the fuck does?
> All I know is that OP is the only one with this issue, and I don't do anything regarding charter IP addresses in my code.
Maybe the person who does have access to the account is being a little shit-stirring asshole.
> Yes, you seem like the type to just whine about something without trying to solve it yourself.
I only "whine" when I can't do a thing to improve a situation in my life.
> I do not control what they decide to block, nor do I have the login for the account we have there so I can't tweak the settings.
And there lies what may be the problem. If you don't have access to the account, then who the fuck does?
> All I know is that OP is the only one with this issue, and I don't do anything regarding charter IP addresses in my code.
Maybe the person who does have access to the account is being a little shit-stirring asshole.
> Yes, you seem like the type to just whine about something without trying to solve it yourself.
I only "whine" when I can't do a thing to improve a situation in my life.
(Edited 49 seconds later.)
r04r !GETFUCKED replied with this 14 years ago, 2 minutes later, 18 hours after the original post[^] [v] #316,453
@previous (HaikerensGuide !0VegJ9Jl.Q)
Sim does, but I'm 98% certain that he has not specifically "distrusted" charter, or anything like that. And again, noone else has the issue so there is no reason to disable the hotlinking (If that's even it). You have never specified what exactly you are getting, you've mentioned a web interface that you could use to unblock yourself. What does it say? Post a screenshot or something.
Sim does, but I'm 98% certain that he has not specifically "distrusted" charter, or anything like that. And again, noone else has the issue so there is no reason to disable the hotlinking (If that's even it). You have never specified what exactly you are getting, you've mentioned a web interface that you could use to unblock yourself. What does it say? Post a screenshot or something.
Anonymous D replied with this 14 years ago, 3 minutes later, 18 hours after the original post[^] [v] #316,454
@316,452 (HaikerensGuide !0VegJ9Jl.Q)
Why rag on her? Like do you think she is paid big bucks to help run this joint?
On your endhave you worked with your ISP to resolve the issue? Why put the burden on her when you're the only one with a problem.
Geeeeeshhh dude
"Erroneous assumptions can be disastrous."
— Peter Drucker
"You don't drown by falling in the water; you drown by staying there."
— Edwin Louis Cole
Why rag on her? Like do you think she is paid big bucks to help run this joint?
On your end
Geeeeeshhh dude
"Erroneous assumptions can be disastrous."
— Peter Drucker
"You don't drown by falling in the water; you drown by staying there."
— Edwin Louis Cole
HaikerensGuide !0VegJ9Jl.Q (OP) replied with this 14 years ago, 2 minutes later, 18 hours after the original post[^] [v] #316,455
@316,453 (r04r !GETFUCKED)> Sim does
Well, there's the problem.
> but I'm 98% certain that he has not specifically "distrusted" charter
Why wouldn't he distrust the ISP that sK has been known to use?
> And again, noone else has the issue so there is no reason to disable the hotlinking (If that's even it).
Sim is a dick. He has fucked with my ability to access the site numerous times (redirecting my IP, banning me for no reason, etc.) and it leaves me with not a doubt in my mind that he is just fucking with me (and you) right now.
> You have never specified what exactly you are getting, you've mentioned a web interface that you could use to unblock yourself. What does it say? Post a screenshot or something.
Here you go.
HaikerensGuide !0VegJ9Jl.Q (OP) double-posted this 14 years ago, 3 minutes later, 18 hours after the original post[^] [v] #316,457
@316,454 (D)
> Why rag on her? Like do you think she is paid big bucks to help run this joint?
I have asked numerous times for this issue to be fixed and sometimes it does get fixed temporarily only to revert to brokenness.
> On your endhave you worked with your ISP to resolve the issue?
No. It's not an ISP-related issue. I have accessed many cloudflare-backed sites with no issue at all, even with the anti-hotlinking stuff. It's an issue exclusively to this site and exclusively to my IP range.
> Why put the burden on her when you're the only one with a problem.
I had put the burden on her because I thought she was the one in control of the fucking site. Now I'm 99.9% certain that it's just sim fucking with me again.
> Why rag on her? Like do you think she is paid big bucks to help run this joint?
I have asked numerous times for this issue to be fixed and sometimes it does get fixed temporarily only to revert to brokenness.
> On your end
No. It's not an ISP-related issue. I have accessed many cloudflare-backed sites with no issue at all, even with the anti-hotlinking stuff. It's an issue exclusively to this site and exclusively to my IP range.
> Why put the burden on her when you're the only one with a problem.
I had put the burden on her because I thought she was the one in control of the fucking site. Now I'm 99.9% certain that it's just sim fucking with me again.
r04r !GETFUCKED replied with this 14 years ago, 4 seconds later, 18 hours after the original post[^] [v] #316,458
@316,455 (HaikerensGuide !0VegJ9Jl.Q)
You missed one instance of your IP at the bottom, and sim isn't as bad as you think. He isn't available at the moment or I'd have taken it up with him. It's funny that it tells you that you're blocked because of the hotlinking, while you claim it only happens on certain IPs.
You missed one instance of your IP at the bottom, and sim isn't as bad as you think. He isn't available at the moment or I'd have taken it up with him. It's funny that it tells you that you're blocked because of the hotlinking, while you claim it only happens on certain IPs.
Anonymous D replied with this 14 years ago, 36 seconds later, 18 hours after the original post[^] [v] #316,459
@316,455 (HaikerensGuide !0VegJ9Jl.Q)
Ooooooohhhhhh So why the hell has it taken you so long to show her THAT IMAGE
And blocking out the last 3 digits on your ISP? Its not like that is useful to anyone really. One is not going to Geo locate you with those digits.
A VPN would get you past the block by the by.
In fact another way around this is to email the Mods and ask about a non-blocked Proxy. I suspect several are available that would solve your problem real fast!
Ooooooohhhhhh So why the hell has it taken you so long to show her THAT IMAGE
And blocking out the last 3 digits on your ISP? Its not like that is useful to anyone really. One is not going to Geo locate you with those digits.
A VPN would get you past the block by the by.
In fact another way around this is to email the Mods and ask about a non-blocked Proxy. I suspect several are available that would solve your problem real fast!
(Edited 1 minute later.)
HaikerensGuide !0VegJ9Jl.Q (OP) replied with this 14 years ago, 3 minutes later, 18 hours after the original post[^] [v] #316,461
@316,458 (r04r !GETFUCKED)
> You missed one instance of your IP at the bottom
I know that. I am just a bit paranoid of being sent boxes of pizz to my house.
> and sim isn't as bad as you think.
He has fucked with my connection in the past.
> He isn't available at the moment or I'd have taken it up with him.
How convenient.
> It's funny that it tells you that you're blocked because of the hotlinking, while you claim it only happens on certain IPs.
I didn't have the issue on AT&T, but I have it on Charter. And even then, it's only within this region, as Charter Houghton works fine with MC.
> You missed one instance of your IP at the bottom
I know that. I am just a bit paranoid of being sent boxes of pizz to my house.
> and sim isn't as bad as you think.
He has fucked with my connection in the past.
> He isn't available at the moment or I'd have taken it up with him.
How convenient.
> It's funny that it tells you that you're blocked because of the hotlinking, while you claim it only happens on certain IPs.
I didn't have the issue on AT&T, but I have it on Charter. And even then, it's only within this region, as Charter Houghton works fine with MC.
Anonymous D replied with this 14 years ago, 2 minutes later, 18 hours after the original post[^] [v] #316,462
r04r !GETFUCKED replied with this 14 years ago, 37 seconds later, 18 hours after the original post[^] [v] #316,463
Anonymous D replied with this 14 years ago, 34 seconds later, 18 hours after the original post[^] [v] #316,464
HaikerensGuide !0VegJ9Jl.Q (OP) replied with this 14 years ago, 2 minutes later, 18 hours after the original post[^] [v] #316,465
@316,459 (D)
> Ooooooohhhhhh So why the hell has it taken you so long to show her THAT IMAGE
I don't know. I guess I was just lazy and thought that copying the message of text would be good enough.
> A VPN would get you past the block by the by.
Well, looks like a proxy does get around the issue.
> In fact another way around this is to email the Mods and ask about a non-blocked Proxy. I suspect several are available that would solve your problem real fast!
*sigh* Perhaps I may have to do that.
> Ooooooohhhhhh So why the hell has it taken you so long to show her THAT IMAGE
I don't know. I guess I was just lazy and thought that copying the message of text would be good enough.
> A VPN would get you past the block by the by.
Well, looks like a proxy does get around the issue.
> In fact another way around this is to email the Mods and ask about a non-blocked Proxy. I suspect several are available that would solve your problem real fast!
*sigh* Perhaps I may have to do that.
HaikerensGuide !0VegJ9Jl.Q (OP) double-posted this 14 years ago, 49 seconds later, 18 hours after the original post[^] [v] #316,466
@316,462 (D)
Of course I do. Which is why I found the issue so puzzling.
@316,463 (r04r !GETFUCKED)
...
Of course I do. Which is why I found the issue so puzzling.
@316,463 (r04r !GETFUCKED)
...
î…€Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx replied with this 14 years ago, 13 seconds later, 18 hours after the original post[^] [v] #316,467
Anonymous I joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 4 minutes later, 18 hours after the original post[^] [v] #316,468
@previous (î…€Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx)This is h--this is how kickin' me in the balls works out. I'm Gonna give Ya a Piece of my mind ya DAMN MOCKING TROLLS!!!!
Anonymous D replied with this 14 years ago, 22 seconds later, 18 hours after the original post[^] [v] #316,469
@316,466 (HaikerensGuide !0VegJ9Jl.Q)
Hummmmmm Time for me to get my 10 mile run in on the beach (gives u who i b away)
Odd thing is - Its not at all unusually for sites to block hotlinking because its a thief of costly bandwidth - Yet I just did exactly that expecting some kind of message telling me as you that I cannot.
Got the image hotlinked from cloudflare to where I wanted it.
Anyway why not play with a few proxies until you find one that allows you inside MC to post.
Hey keep in mind that shit happens. Frustrating yes but considering you soon will be out of the nest one day- well shit happens.
So I see you can use a proxy....WTF? Use it use it use it and find another for back up. Proxies have a way as you know of going away or becoming useless.
Hummmmmm Time for me to get my 10 mile run in on the beach (gives u who i b away)
Odd thing is - Its not at all unusually for sites to block hotlinking because its a thief of costly bandwidth - Yet I just did exactly that expecting some kind of message telling me as you that I cannot.
Got the image hotlinked from cloudflare to where I wanted it.
Anyway why not play with a few proxies until you find one that allows you inside MC to post.
Hey keep in mind that shit happens. Frustrating yes but considering you soon will be out of the nest one day- well shit happens.
So I see you can use a proxy....WTF? Use it use it use it and find another for back up. Proxies have a way as you know of going away or becoming useless.
(Edited 2 minutes later.)
Anonymous D double-posted this 14 years ago, 9 minutes later, 19 hours after the original post[^] [v] #316,473
@previous (D)
ONE LAST THING B4 eye hit the road.
Have you looked up Cloudflare?
https://www.cloudflare.com/plans
Now notice the FREE Plan. You might for the sake of laffs give them a go. Doubt using them will have you blocked by them lolololol
Ooooops looks only useful if you have a website .... Probably a gateway plan to get you to pay for the full service.
Proxy proxy or one of the VPN's including that Free one from Cnet
ONE LAST THING B4 eye hit the road.
Have you looked up Cloudflare?
https://www.cloudflare.com/plans
Now notice the FREE Plan. You might for the sake of laffs give them a go. Doubt using them will have you blocked by them lolololol
Ooooops looks only useful if you have a website .... Probably a gateway plan to get you to pay for the full service.
Proxy proxy or one of the VPN's including that Free one from Cnet
(Edited 2 minutes later.)
Anonymous J joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 1 hour later, 20 hours after the original post[^] [v] #316,498
@316,340 (r04r !GETFUCKED)
> Noone else has this problem
I had the same problem too. It went away a few hours ago, it seems.
> Noone else has this problem
I had the same problem too. It went away a few hours ago, it seems.
(Edited 19 seconds later.)