Topic: Pedophiles are not evil
Anonymous A started this discussion 14 years ago #19,208
A pedophile is someone that finds them self attracted to kids, they didn't choose it, they don't necessarily want it, but they are attracted to kids nevertheless. That's by definition. From speaking to a lot of pedophiles myself, it seems that having sex with a child seems to trigger it - well most if not all of the pedos I've befriended have had sex as a child or been abused. It's obviously a vaguely understood psychological issue no-one cares about. Other groups of society escape prejudice because they did not choose their uniqueness, such as homosexuals and ethnic minorities. It's just unfortunate that pedophiles weren't part of the sexual revolution for gays.
People who rape and hurt children are evil. Rapist usually prey on the vulnerable like kids and the elderly. Please don't assume all pedophiles want to rape kids, because a lot of us are just craving for a consensual, loving relationship with mutual respect between the child - and if you don't think pedophiles aren't entitled to that, then get fucked.
People who rape and hurt children are evil. Rapist usually prey on the vulnerable like kids and the elderly. Please don't assume all pedophiles want to rape kids, because a lot of us are just craving for a consensual, loving relationship with mutual respect between the child - and if you don't think pedophiles aren't entitled to that, then get fucked.
Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 40 seconds later[^] [v] #315,960
except they are.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 14 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #315,961
@previous (B)
Heterosexual men commit more rape and sexual assault than anyone else, hate all straight men?
Heterosexual men commit more rape and sexual assault than anyone else, hate all straight men?
Anonymous B replied with this 14 years ago, 2 minutes later, 4 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #315,962
@previous (A)
Straights are the reason for the inevitable extinction of humanity. Of course we should hate them. Your point?
Straights are the reason for the inevitable extinction of humanity. Of course we should hate them. Your point?
Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 2 minutes later, 6 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #315,965
Guranteed replies.
squeegee !firstkPE1Q joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 1 hour later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #315,979
@315,961 (A)
No, that's just silly. There's nothing wrong with straight sex. But pedophiles are disgusting and gross. They should be locked up. No exceptions.
No, that's just silly. There's nothing wrong with straight sex. But pedophiles are disgusting and gross. They should be locked up. No exceptions.
Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 1 second later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #315,980
> Topic: Pedophiles are not evil
Same Logic would apply to telling people brand new Nazi's are not evil.
Same Logic would apply to telling people brand new Nazi's are not evil.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 14 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #315,981
Anonymous B replied with this 14 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #315,982
@315,980 (E)
Nothing is evil really. Evil is the ultimate self-serving phillosophical construct. All that offends me is necessarilly evil, all that which enables me is necessarilly good. The whole idea is as pointless as someone saying they like food.
Nothing is evil really. Evil is the ultimate self-serving phillosophical construct. All that offends me is necessarilly evil, all that which enables me is necessarilly good. The whole idea is as pointless as someone saying they like food.
SQUARED :3 !L.....AlN. joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 2 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #315,983
falsenext question
Anonymous E replied with this 14 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #315,986
@315,981 (A)
Because you were born a Pedophile, your destiny is to rape and probably kill children. You're genetically fucked up. You're pure evil. You're rotten to the core. There is no hope for you.
Find a friend to load you up with Heroin and lots of booze and have the friend chop your balls off. If that is too much trouble then a bullet to the brain should be sufficient.
Because you were born a Pedophile, your destiny is to rape and probably kill children. You're genetically fucked up. You're pure evil. You're rotten to the core. There is no hope for you.
Find a friend to load you up with Heroin and lots of booze and have the friend chop your balls off. If that is too much trouble then a bullet to the brain should be sufficient.
squeegee !firstkPE1Q replied with this 14 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #315,991
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 14 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #315,997
@315,986 (E)
I'm not ever going to rape or kill a child, why would I cause pain and suffering to the ones I love most? It just doesn't make any sense. I'm not a danger to children so just calm down.
I'm not ever going to rape or kill a child, why would I cause pain and suffering to the ones I love most? It just doesn't make any sense. I'm not a danger to children so just calm down.
squeegee !firstkPE1Q replied with this 14 years ago, 5 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #316,001
@previous (A)
> I'm not ever going to rape or kill a child
But accidents do happen! You think you can go your entire life without accidentally raping or killing a child? You're nuts! That's like saying you love to drive fast but will never wreck your car! No, what you need is a plan, like insurance.
Do you have an alias or second identity you can fall back on?
> I'm not ever going to rape or kill a child
But accidents do happen! You think you can go your entire life without accidentally raping or killing a child? You're nuts! That's like saying you love to drive fast but will never wreck your car! No, what you need is a plan, like insurance.
Do you have an alias or second identity you can fall back on?
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 14 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #316,004
squeegee !firstkPE1Q replied with this 14 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #316,006
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 14 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #316,008
@previous (squeegee !firstkPE1Q)
No point raping a kid when I can easily find one willing to fuck me.
No point raping a kid when I can easily find one willing to fuck me.
squeegee !firstkPE1Q replied with this 14 years ago, 6 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #316,012
@previous (A)
Also extreme narcissism and and a fundamental misunderstanding of human behavior as well as a complete lack of empathy. For starters.
Also extreme narcissism and and a fundamental misunderstanding of human behavior as well as a complete lack of empathy. For starters.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 14 years ago, 4 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #316,017
squeegee !firstkPE1Q replied with this 14 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #316,018
Anonymous E replied with this 14 years ago, 26 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #316,030
@316,008 (A)
> No point raping a kid when I can easily find one willing to fuck me.
Typical of a diseased warped fucked up mind. Rapist goes into court after getting caught for raping your Mother and says "I could see her consent in her eyes"
Just warped fucked up brains Pedophiles have.
> No point raping a kid when I can easily find one willing to fuck me.
Typical of a diseased warped fucked up mind. Rapist goes into court after getting caught for raping your Mother and says "I could see her consent in her eyes"
Just warped fucked up brains Pedophiles have.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 14 years ago, 4 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #316,033
@previous (E)
Don't kid yourself, easy to find a teen with a craving for cock if you loiter in the right chatrooms.
Don't kid yourself, easy to find a teen with a craving for cock if you loiter in the right chatrooms.
squeegee !firstkPE1Q replied with this 14 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #316,034
Anonymous E replied with this 14 years ago, 4 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #316,036
@316,033 (A)
Sure if sicko pervert asshole goes looking to do evil shit, then sure you will be successful. I hope you're caught and in prison you get fucked over good by 400 pound dudes.
You know you will be caught one day.
Sure if sicko pervert asshole goes looking to do evil shit, then sure you will be successful. I hope you're caught and in prison you get fucked over good by 400 pound dudes.
You know you will be caught one day.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 14 years ago, 3 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #316,037
Anonymous G joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 4 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #316,039
@previous (A)
Because there's no such thing as a legally consenting teenager, as teenagers are not legally capable of consent. Jew laws are clever like that.
Because there's no such thing as a legally consenting teenager, as teenagers are not legally capable of consent. Jew laws are clever like that.
(Edited 6 minutes later.)
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 14 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #316,040
squeegee !firstkPE1Q replied with this 14 years ago, 3 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #316,042
@previous (A)
Then violate the law. As many times as you can grt away with it. You know it's worth it. Besides, you can always hang yourself in prison.
Then violate the law. As many times as you can grt away with it. You know it's worth it. Besides, you can always hang yourself in prison.
Anonymous G replied with this 14 years ago, 4 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #316,046
@previous (squeegee !firstkPE1Q)
This advice would be sage were it not about making little kid's assholes sore.
This advice would be sage were it not about making little kid's assholes sore.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 14 years ago, 25 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #316,047
@316,042 (squeegee !firstkPE1Q)
Stop giving me advice that you think will lead to my incarceration. I'm smart.
Stop giving me advice that you think will lead to my incarceration. I'm smart.
Anonymous E replied with this 14 years ago, 4 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #316,050
@316,040 (A)
> Morally I see no problem with it.
Of course not because You're pure evil. You're rotten to the core.
> Morally I see no problem with it.
Of course not because You're pure evil. You're rotten to the core.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 14 years ago, 2 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #316,053
Broseph !!fxnDb+Ve4 joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 3 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #316,056
They're not all evil, just ones like to4str are. Hi to4str.
It's their actions that make them evil. Some control themselves, while other have a thought process that's so convoluted that they convince themselves that it's not evil to trick his little brother into drinking semen.
It's their actions that make them evil. Some control themselves, while other have a thought process that's so convoluted that they convince themselves that it's not evil to trick his little brother into drinking semen.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 14 years ago, 5 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #316,059
@previous (Broseph !!fxnDb+Ve4)
How is it evil? It's quality protein, it doesn't hurt him and he likes it. So what's your problem?
How is it evil? It's quality protein, it doesn't hurt him and he likes it. So what's your problem?
Anonymous E replied with this 14 years ago, 2 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #316,060
@316,053 (A)
Nor does
"Topic: Pedophiles are not evil"
In a free society you are free to be Evil of Brain.
Nor does
"Topic: Pedophiles are not evil"
In a free society you are free to be Evil of Brain.
Anonymous G replied with this 14 years ago, 21 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #316,062
@316,059 (A)
Because your semen comes from a micropenis. Nobody takes semen from a micropenis voluntarily. That's what makes it evil.
Because your semen comes from a micropenis. Nobody takes semen from a micropenis voluntarily. That's what makes it evil.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 14 years ago, 3 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #316,064
Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx replied with this 14 years ago, 2 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #316,066
@316,059 (A)
Were you just trying to perform laser surgery when you pointed that laser into his eye, then?
Were you just trying to perform laser surgery when you pointed that laser into his eye, then?
kook !nH6RAuX8mo joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 1 minute later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #316,067
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 14 years ago, 4 seconds later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #316,068
@316,066 (Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx)
I cannot tell you how much regret I feel for that particular incident.
I cannot tell you how much regret I feel for that particular incident.
Anonymous E replied with this 14 years ago, 3 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #316,072
@316,067 (kook !nH6RAuX8mo)
So you're saying men who continue to think about & work out a plan, too rape children, are not evil?
So you're saying men who continue to think about & work out a plan, too rape children, are not evil?
kook !nH6RAuX8mo replied with this 14 years ago, 1 minute later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #316,073
Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx replied with this 14 years ago, 3 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #316,075
@316,068 (A)
Really? You didn't seem to give a fuck at the time. Your main concern was if you'd get in trouble for doing it.
Really? You didn't seem to give a fuck at the time. Your main concern was if you'd get in trouble for doing it.
Anonymous G replied with this 14 years ago, 7 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #316,080
Anonymous E replied with this 14 years ago, 20 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #316,091
@316,073 (kook !nH6RAuX8mo)
> Work out a plan? yes, if they go through with it.
You want children to be molested?
> Work out a plan? yes, if they go through with it.
You want children to be molested?
kook !nH6RAuX8mo replied with this 14 years ago, 6 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #316,098
Nega !34Kas0OdzM joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 14 hours later, 18 hours after the original post[^] [v] #316,325
What is evil?
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 14 years ago, 7 minutes later, 18 hours after the original post[^] [v] #316,326
Anonymous G replied with this 14 years ago, 1 hour later, 20 hours after the original post[^] [v] #316,333
@316,325 (Nega !34Kas0OdzM)
Evil is that which I do not like. Cause I don't pretend there's anything bigger than myself making decisions for my life.
Evil is that which I do not like. Cause I don't pretend there's anything bigger than myself making decisions for my life.
Anonymous K joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 10 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #316,506
what's wrong with being a pedo in and of itself?
if anything they deserve proper psychological care as anybody else with impulses to hurt others
if anything they deserve proper psychological care as anybody else with impulses to hurt others
(Edited 1 minute later.)
squeegee !firstkPE1Q joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 16 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #316,507
@previous (K)> if anything they deserve proper psychological care as anybody else with impulses to hurt others
How is that funny? I don't see the joke
Handel !khEOdtKF56 joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 1 hour later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #316,549
@OP
> It's just unfortunate that pedophiles weren't part of the sexual revolution for gays.
We have sex with man who are mentally capable of consenting to it. Don't try and put me in your perverted boat.
> Claims accidents don't happen.
> Nearly blinds his own brother.
Do you even know how fucked up you are? If it wasn't for the fact your so fucking pathetic you would have been permabanned day 1.
> It's just unfortunate that pedophiles weren't part of the sexual revolution for gays.
We have sex with man who are mentally capable of consenting to it. Don't try and put me in your perverted boat.
> Claims accidents don't happen.
> Nearly blinds his own brother.
Do you even know how fucked up you are? If it wasn't for the fact your so fucking pathetic you would have been permabanned day 1.
(Edited 13 seconds later.)
Anonymous E replied with this 14 years ago, 8 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #316,562
@previous (Handel !khEOdtKF56)
Perhaps OP is a good reminder of how truly sick a few Humans are. How fortunate the rest of us are, for not being infected with HIS Disease.
Perhaps OP is a good reminder of how truly sick a few Humans are. How fortunate the rest of us are, for not being infected with HIS Disease.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 14 years ago, 7 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #316,571
@316,506 (K)
Pedophiles don't necessarily hurt children. I think anyone with urges to rape, hurt, molest or kill needs appropriate treatment, we're all human beings.
@316,549 (Handel !khEOdtKF56)
Only god can judge me bitch.
@previous (E)
Disease? Rich and successful? You wish you were me you fucking nobody. Get fucked.
Pedophiles don't necessarily hurt children. I think anyone with urges to rape, hurt, molest or kill needs appropriate treatment, we're all human beings.
@316,549 (Handel !khEOdtKF56)
Only god can judge me bitch.
@previous (E)
Disease? Rich and successful? You wish you were me you fucking nobody. Get fucked.
kook !nH6RAuX8mo replied with this 14 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #316,573
@316,562 (E)
maybe you should feel pity for them, instead of disgust. people cant help being pedophiles.
maybe you should feel pity for them, instead of disgust. people cant help being pedophiles.
squeegee !firstkPE1Q replied with this 14 years ago, 5 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #316,584
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 14 years ago, 7 seconds later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #316,585
@316,573 (kook !nH6RAuX8mo)
People that hate a group of individuals for something they cannot control are as bad (or worse) than Adolf Hitler's 3rd reich in Germany during the 1030s. These people are unsympathetic, narrow minded, stereotyping ignorant fuck heads that need a group of people to blame their life problems on and direct all their animosity at. This only applies to those which fully understand the distinction between "someone that is a pedophile through no decision of their own and has not broken the law in any way" and "someone that rapes kids" or "someone that hurts kids" or even "someone that kills kids", if every single pedophile on the face of this planet was an active child molester, there would not be any children untouched.
People that hate a group of individuals for something they cannot control are as bad (or worse) than Adolf Hitler's 3rd reich in Germany during the 1030s. These people are unsympathetic, narrow minded, stereotyping ignorant fuck heads that need a group of people to blame their life problems on and direct all their animosity at. This only applies to those which fully understand the distinction between "someone that is a pedophile through no decision of their own and has not broken the law in any way" and "someone that rapes kids" or "someone that hurts kids" or even "someone that kills kids", if every single pedophile on the face of this planet was an active child molester, there would not be any children untouched.
Anonymous E replied with this 14 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #316,590
@316,571 (A)
Osama bin Laden - Hitler and countless other Rich assholes had/have what you have money wise. No one other then perhaps you wishes You were them.
@316,573 (kook !nH6RAuX8mo)
So are you telling me that if one day you have children and they are Raped, you will only feel pity for them?
And if you had been Raped by a Pedo when you were a child, are you telling me you would only feel pity for them?
Should we all have felt pity for Osama bin Laden and Hitler. After all using your weird logic; They could not help being what they were.
Osama bin Laden - Hitler and countless other Rich assholes had/have what you have money wise. No one other then perhaps you wishes You were them.
@316,573 (kook !nH6RAuX8mo)
So are you telling me that if one day you have children and they are Raped, you will only feel pity for them?
And if you had been Raped by a Pedo when you were a child, are you telling me you would only feel pity for them?
Should we all have felt pity for Osama bin Laden and Hitler. After all using your weird logic; They could not help being what they were.
kook !nH6RAuX8mo replied with this 14 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #316,594
@previous (E)
I feel pity for someone who is persecuted for their thoughts, not for predators who hurt the defenseless.. Also, you know nothing of my childhood and nothing about empathy.
I feel pity for someone who is persecuted for their thoughts, not for predators who hurt the defenseless.. Also, you know nothing of my childhood and nothing about empathy.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 14 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #316,596
@316,549 (Handel !khEOdtKF56)
So only an 18-year-old can consent to sex? So what about a 17-year-old and 364 days old girl and a 20-year-old man, does the man deserve the next 30 years in jail? What about if the girl was 16? Actually the age of consent in my country is 16. What about just a little south of the USA in Mexico where the age of consent is 12? Who are we to try and apply some kind of preset rules for a sexual relationship instead of granting judges the discretion to judge the merits of each case where there has been an accusation made of rape, assault or whatever? Providing that both parties consent, statutory rape is essentially a victimless crime. I don't think that someone (and all of their family, friends) deserve to be incarcerated for years of their life when there is no victim, the only victim in that is the one behind bars.
So only an 18-year-old can consent to sex? So what about a 17-year-old and 364 days old girl and a 20-year-old man, does the man deserve the next 30 years in jail? What about if the girl was 16? Actually the age of consent in my country is 16. What about just a little south of the USA in Mexico where the age of consent is 12? Who are we to try and apply some kind of preset rules for a sexual relationship instead of granting judges the discretion to judge the merits of each case where there has been an accusation made of rape, assault or whatever? Providing that both parties consent, statutory rape is essentially a victimless crime. I don't think that someone (and all of their family, friends) deserve to be incarcerated for years of their life when there is no victim, the only victim in that is the one behind bars.
Anonymous A (OP) double-posted this 14 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #316,601
@316,590 (E)
You're seeing the word "pedophile" and immediately associating that with rape. A pedophile is someone attracted to kids, that's it, nothing else. Unless you believe in thought crimes? We're at no point condoning rape here.
You're seeing the word "pedophile" and immediately associating that with rape. A pedophile is someone attracted to kids, that's it, nothing else. Unless you believe in thought crimes? We're at no point condoning rape here.
Broseph !!fxnDb+Ve4 replied with this 14 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #316,604
@316,596 (A)
You're using shit like that to justify pedophilia, when most laws take that into account. In many states the age of consent is 16 not 18, and of all the states that set the official age of consent at 18, they usually have laws that say 16 and 17 are OK as long as the partner is under 24 and rules like that. So a 19 year old having sex with a 17 1/2 year old does not mean it's OK for a 25 year old to have sex with a 9 year old. Get over it.
You're using shit like that to justify pedophilia, when most laws take that into account. In many states the age of consent is 16 not 18, and of all the states that set the official age of consent at 18, they usually have laws that say 16 and 17 are OK as long as the partner is under 24 and rules like that. So a 19 year old having sex with a 17 1/2 year old does not mean it's OK for a 25 year old to have sex with a 9 year old. Get over it.
kook !nH6RAuX8mo replied with this 14 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #316,607
@previous (Broseph !!fxnDb+Ve4)
No seriously. How can you judge someone for an involuntary attraction if they never act on it? Can any person on this board truthfully say that they've never had a disturbing thought? not necessarily about children, though. No rape fantasies? Nothing?
No seriously. How can you judge someone for an involuntary attraction if they never act on it? Can any person on this board truthfully say that they've never had a disturbing thought? not necessarily about children, though. No rape fantasies? Nothing?
Broseph !!fxnDb+Ve4 replied with this 14 years ago, 4 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #316,611
@previous (kook !nH6RAuX8mo)
Maybe, but I don't try to justify them to myself or to other people. If you start trying to justify it, then you're on a slippery slope where you're justifying that it's OK, and that's why pedophiles like to4str scare me. All the ones who commit crimes have the same convoluted thought process where they don't think what they're actually doing is wrong.
I can respect pedophiles who accept that they have a problem, accept that it's wrong, suppress it completely and seek help. I can't respect pedophile who make threads like this hoping to use sympathy to justify it and slip down that road.
Maybe, but I don't try to justify them to myself or to other people. If you start trying to justify it, then you're on a slippery slope where you're justifying that it's OK, and that's why pedophiles like to4str scare me. All the ones who commit crimes have the same convoluted thought process where they don't think what they're actually doing is wrong.
I can respect pedophiles who accept that they have a problem, accept that it's wrong, suppress it completely and seek help. I can't respect pedophile who make threads like this hoping to use sympathy to justify it and slip down that road.
Anonymous E replied with this 14 years ago, 14 seconds later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #316,612
@316,594 (kook !nH6RAuX8mo)
Kook you must have miss OP saying he has sex with children
> No point raping a kid when I can easily find one willing to fuck me.
@316,008 (A)
@316,601 (A)
You have already pointed out you have sex with children....Even to the point of telling all of us these children are willing
Another for instance
> Don't kid yourself, easy to find a teen with a craving for cock if you loiter in the right chatrooms.
Kook you must have miss OP saying he has sex with children
> No point raping a kid when I can easily find one willing to fuck me.
@316,008 (A)
@316,601 (A)
You have already pointed out you have sex with children....Even to the point of telling all of us these children are willing
Another for instance
> Don't kid yourself, easy to find a teen with a craving for cock if you loiter in the right chatrooms.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 14 years ago, 44 seconds later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #316,614
@316,604 (Broseph !!fxnDb+Ve4)
First of all, you're making big generalizations here. I already said I'm not in the USA, so why would I give a fuck about USA laws? Why would the rest of the world care about USA laws? It's called English for a reason dickhead. Does the world revolve around your fucking country? Most people in the world don't live in the USA and most jurisdictions do not "take into account" the specific difference in age.
First of all, you're making big generalizations here. I already said I'm not in the USA, so why would I give a fuck about USA laws? Why would the rest of the world care about USA laws? It's called English for a reason dickhead. Does the world revolve around your fucking country? Most people in the world don't live in the USA and most jurisdictions do not "take into account" the specific difference in age.
kook !nH6RAuX8mo replied with this 14 years ago, 24 seconds later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #316,616
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 14 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #316,620
@316,612 (E)
> OP saying he has sex with children
(Never actually happened.)
> > easy to find a teen
> > teen
Even an 18-year-old is bad now?
> OP saying he has sex with children
(Never actually happened.)
> > easy to find a teen
> > teen
Even an 18-year-old is bad now?
kook !nH6RAuX8mo replied with this 14 years ago, 20 seconds later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #316,621
@316,611 (Broseph !!fxnDb+Ve4)
Can you suppress a sexual attraction completely? Should he never speak of it? Honestly, I dont try to justify thoughts, because I know that my thoughts arent hurting anyone.
Can you suppress a sexual attraction completely? Should he never speak of it? Honestly, I dont try to justify thoughts, because I know that my thoughts arent hurting anyone.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 14 years ago, 20 seconds later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #316,622
Some people are just cunts.
(Edited 27 seconds later.)
Broseph !!fxnDb+Ve4 replied with this 14 years ago, 46 seconds later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #316,625
@316,614 (A)
So because it's wrong for the law to persecute an 19 year old and a 17 1/2 year old, then the law must also be wrong in persecuting grown men from having sex with little boys? So it's perfectly fine for you to do so?
That's like saying that a speed limit should be 55 instead of 45 so you have the right to drive 110. You have no respect for the law.
So because it's wrong for the law to persecute an 19 year old and a 17 1/2 year old, then the law must also be wrong in persecuting grown men from having sex with little boys? So it's perfectly fine for you to do so?
That's like saying that a speed limit should be 55 instead of 45 so you have the right to drive 110. You have no respect for the law.
Broseph !!fxnDb+Ve4 double-posted this 14 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #316,629
@316,621 (kook !nH6RAuX8mo)
He's not even trying to suppress it. He won't even admit that it's wrong. He's admitted to having sex with children and believes that the law and society are wrong for telling him he can't. He not the victim here. He deserves no sympathy. I'll save my sympathy for the pedophiles who can at least admit that it's wrong, instead of trying to say that they're right.
He's not even trying to suppress it. He won't even admit that it's wrong. He's admitted to having sex with children and believes that the law and society are wrong for telling him he can't. He not the victim here. He deserves no sympathy. I'll save my sympathy for the pedophiles who can at least admit that it's wrong, instead of trying to say that they're right.
kook !nH6RAuX8mo replied with this 14 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #316,631
@previous (Broseph !!fxnDb+Ve4)
I'll give you that. At least have pity and patience for people who are trying.
I'll give you that. At least have pity and patience for people who are trying.
Anonymous E replied with this 14 years ago, 11 seconds later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #316,632
@316,622 (A)
You have your own home breed definition for what is a child. Anything to justify your molestation of children.
@316,616 (kook !nH6RAuX8mo)
> you should have a problem with child molesters than, not pedos.
You appear to find child molesters and pedo's as tolerable.
I put both of them in the same boat.
You have your own home breed definition for what is a child. Anything to justify your molestation of children.
@316,616 (kook !nH6RAuX8mo)
> you should have a problem with child molesters than, not pedos.
You appear to find child molesters and pedo's as tolerable.
I put both of them in the same boat.
squeegee !firstkPE1Q replied with this 14 years ago, 1 second later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #316,633
@316,614 (A)
they'll adopt the US system soon enough. seems to be the rising tide, wouldn't you say?
they'll adopt the US system soon enough. seems to be the rising tide, wouldn't you say?
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 14 years ago, 34 seconds later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #316,635
@316,625 (Broseph !!fxnDb+Ve4)
Define "little boys". I have driven my car at a maximum of 186mph on de-restricted autobahn during a trip in Germany, you can be jealous of that all you want but I really don't give a fuck. Get out of my thread.
Define "little boys". I have driven my car at a maximum of 186mph on de-restricted autobahn during a trip in Germany, you can be jealous of that all you want but I really don't give a fuck. Get out of my thread.
Anonymous E replied with this 14 years ago, 47 seconds later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #316,636
@316,629 (Broseph !!fxnDb+Ve4)
Yea its like that Men who love boys group. They openly advocate sex with children. Upfront about it.
Yea its like that Men who love boys group. They openly advocate sex with children. Upfront about it.
Broseph !!fxnDb+Ve4 replied with this 14 years ago, 6 seconds later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #316,637
kook !nH6RAuX8mo replied with this 14 years ago, 22 seconds later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #316,638
@316,632 (E)
that's offensive. I do find pedos to be tolerable. I tolerate anyone who is not actively hurting other's. I'm not an advocate of adults and children having sex. You put those two in the same boat because you're not bright.
that's offensive. I do find pedos to be tolerable. I tolerate anyone who is not actively hurting other's. I'm not an advocate of adults and children having sex. You put those two in the same boat because you're not bright.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 14 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #316,642
@316,629 (Broseph !!fxnDb+Ve4)
I'll acknowledge that right now society thinks it's immoral, but I can't say I believe it because I think in future society will eventually evolve to be more accepting. Look at what has changed in the last 140 years, slavery, racism, homophobic (gay sex illegal in the UK until within my parents lifetime), sexism, all of that stuff has changed now. How can we predict the logic future generations will employ?
I'll acknowledge that right now society thinks it's immoral, but I can't say I believe it because I think in future society will eventually evolve to be more accepting. Look at what has changed in the last 140 years, slavery, racism, homophobic (gay sex illegal in the UK until within my parents lifetime), sexism, all of that stuff has changed now. How can we predict the logic future generations will employ?
(Edited 34 seconds later.)
Anonymous E replied with this 14 years ago, 18 seconds later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #316,643
@316,638 (kook !nH6RAuX8mo)
OP has already said multiple times in this thread he fucks children. He even says its easy to find willing children.
How about you defining the difference between molestation and pedo's. In you book does it come down to a so called willing child?
OP has already said multiple times in this thread he fucks children. He even says its easy to find willing children.
How about you defining the difference between molestation and pedo's. In you book does it come down to a so called willing child?
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 14 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #316,644
@previous (E)
> OP has already said multiple times in this thread he fucks children.
Incorrect.
> He even says its easy to find willing children.
Incorrect.
> OP has already said multiple times in this thread he fucks children.
Incorrect.
> He even says its easy to find willing children.
Incorrect.
kook !nH6RAuX8mo replied with this 14 years ago, 24 seconds later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #316,645
@316,643 (E)
I dont think adults should have sex with children at all. Pedophile refers to an attraction, molestation refers to an act.
I dont think adults should have sex with children at all. Pedophile refers to an attraction, molestation refers to an act.
kook !nH6RAuX8mo double-posted this 14 years ago, 37 seconds later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #316,647
Broseph !!fxnDb+Ve4 replied with this 14 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #316,649
@316,638 (kook !nH6RAuX8mo)
If someone has very strong urges to murder people, and admits that they want more than anything to murder someone, but they haven't actually murdered someone yet, what do you do about that sort of person? Do you tell yourself that because they haven't actually murdered someone yet, that it's unfair to discriminate against them, or do you discriminate against them by notifying the authorities and forcing them to get help. Furthermore, what if you try to reason with this person, but they keep giving all sorts of convoluted reasons for why it would be OK to murder someone if the opportunity came up? That wouldn't scare you? Now let's take it step further and say that they admit to murdering someone but it's OK because that person was suicidal anyone and consented to being murdered? Aren't you now worried that it's going to be a lot easier for them to murder someone else?
Replace murder with child molestation and you have OP. Not all pedophiles are monsters, but OP is, and he's trying to hide behind the shadow of the few who take responsibility for their condition. He deserves no sympathy.
If someone has very strong urges to murder people, and admits that they want more than anything to murder someone, but they haven't actually murdered someone yet, what do you do about that sort of person? Do you tell yourself that because they haven't actually murdered someone yet, that it's unfair to discriminate against them, or do you discriminate against them by notifying the authorities and forcing them to get help. Furthermore, what if you try to reason with this person, but they keep giving all sorts of convoluted reasons for why it would be OK to murder someone if the opportunity came up? That wouldn't scare you? Now let's take it step further and say that they admit to murdering someone but it's OK because that person was suicidal anyone and consented to being murdered? Aren't you now worried that it's going to be a lot easier for them to murder someone else?
Replace murder with child molestation and you have OP. Not all pedophiles are monsters, but OP is, and he's trying to hide behind the shadow of the few who take responsibility for their condition. He deserves no sympathy.
Anonymous E replied with this 14 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #316,654
@316,644 (A)
You must be suffering from early onset dementia. Look at my reply where I point out YOU in this thread and cite the post and quote what you said right here
....> @316,612 (E)
You must be suffering from early onset dementia. Look at my reply where I point out YOU in this thread and cite the post and quote what you said right here
....> @316,612 (E)
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 14 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #316,658
kook !nH6RAuX8mo replied with this 14 years ago, 12 seconds later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #316,659
@316,649 (Broseph !!fxnDb+Ve4)
Let's take toaster out of this. Yes,that type of person would be scary. Do you treat pedophiles who dont act like this in nice ways? if someone just mentioned having feelings about children, would this whole board, yourself included shit all over them? Probably. Why is that?
Let's take toaster out of this. Yes,that type of person would be scary. Do you treat pedophiles who dont act like this in nice ways? if someone just mentioned having feelings about children, would this whole board, yourself included shit all over them? Probably. Why is that?
Anonymous E replied with this 14 years ago, 58 seconds later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #316,660
@316,647 (kook !nH6RAuX8mo)
Again you seem to be S L O W on reading what he has said in the threads here. He says he has sex with children and has no trouble finding them. So this is not just a matter of dreams or wants...Its actions.
And yes sorry you do not care for how I feel about it but when someone says they wish they could molest or rape children, I am hard nosed about how I feel about them. Gun loaded and ready to shoot and its just a matter of when.
In any case OP admits he fucks over children.
Again you seem to be S L O W on reading what he has said in the threads here. He says he has sex with children and has no trouble finding them. So this is not just a matter of dreams or wants...Its actions.
And yes sorry you do not care for how I feel about it but when someone says they wish they could molest or rape children, I am hard nosed about how I feel about them. Gun loaded and ready to shoot and its just a matter of when.
In any case OP admits he fucks over children.
kook !nH6RAuX8mo replied with this 14 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #316,662
Broseph !!fxnDb+Ve4 replied with this 14 years ago, 4 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #316,663
@316,659 (kook !nH6RAuX8mo)
I actually have a friend who is a pedophile. He has never done anything to a child, has never spoken about doing anything to a child, but served time for having child pornography on his computer. He admits it was wrong. He doesn't try to find different ways to justify it like to4str does.
With to4str and people like him out of the equation, I agree with you. But we can't take to4str out because we're arguing with to4str right now and there are lots of pedophiles just like him who honestly don't believe they're doing anything wrong. I'll even go so far as to say that to4str is not a monster, because I believe that he believes he's really not doing any harm. His convoluted thinking and defense mechanisms will not allow him to believe that his urges are wrong. He can't handle reality.
I actually have a friend who is a pedophile. He has never done anything to a child, has never spoken about doing anything to a child, but served time for having child pornography on his computer. He admits it was wrong. He doesn't try to find different ways to justify it like to4str does.
With to4str and people like him out of the equation, I agree with you. But we can't take to4str out because we're arguing with to4str right now and there are lots of pedophiles just like him who honestly don't believe they're doing anything wrong. I'll even go so far as to say that to4str is not a monster, because I believe that he believes he's really not doing any harm. His convoluted thinking and defense mechanisms will not allow him to believe that his urges are wrong. He can't handle reality.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 14 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #316,664
@316,649 (Broseph !!fxnDb+Ve4)
God you're such a fucking moron. Pedophilia is absolutely not the urge to molest a kid. As I have been trying to explain, the vast majority of pedophiles do not ever have sex with children. There are simply too many pedophiles worldwide, so many children would be affected if people were having sex with kids that often.
> why it would be OK to murder someone if the opportunity came up?
There are other ways of describing this with reduced sentences, manslaughter, self defense, endless mitigating factors. Having consensual sex with someone that happens to be under the age of consent is usually treated very seriously by the courts no matter the circumstances, personally I think that's unfair.
> they admit to murdering someone
But I've never molested a child or admitted molesting a child, that's a blatant lie. Pure slander.
God you're such a fucking moron. Pedophilia is absolutely not the urge to molest a kid. As I have been trying to explain, the vast majority of pedophiles do not ever have sex with children. There are simply too many pedophiles worldwide, so many children would be affected if people were having sex with kids that often.
> why it would be OK to murder someone if the opportunity came up?
There are other ways of describing this with reduced sentences, manslaughter, self defense, endless mitigating factors. Having consensual sex with someone that happens to be under the age of consent is usually treated very seriously by the courts no matter the circumstances, personally I think that's unfair.
> they admit to murdering someone
But I've never molested a child or admitted molesting a child, that's a blatant lie. Pure slander.
Anonymous E replied with this 14 years ago, 6 seconds later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #316,665
@316,662 (kook !nH6RAuX8mo)
Odd how you want/need to take toaster out of it. You want me to somehow slice/dice levels of sicko's so that toaster is evil in your book yet you want to set some undefined edge for OP. OP may argue that he lives in some 3rd world country where a 14 year old child is legal tender. I remind him that once upon a time Hitler made it legal to put babies and those of any age into ovens or line them up and shoot them. The law was on his side.
Much the same for some rag head areas where a raped woman of age is forced to marry her rapist in order to satisfy the court (current events) Laws of perverted countries does NOT make something morally right.
So OP perhaps you live in a perverted amoral country where 14 is legal?
Odd how you want/need to take toaster out of it. You want me to somehow slice/dice levels of sicko's so that toaster is evil in your book yet you want to set some undefined edge for OP. OP may argue that he lives in some 3rd world country where a 14 year old child is legal tender. I remind him that once upon a time Hitler made it legal to put babies and those of any age into ovens or line them up and shoot them. The law was on his side.
Much the same for some rag head areas where a raped woman of age is forced to marry her rapist in order to satisfy the court (current events) Laws of perverted countries does NOT make something morally right.
So OP perhaps you live in a perverted amoral country where 14 is legal?
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 14 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #316,670
@previous (E)
I really do not like being called a "sicko" and "evil" when I have not broken the law and not done anything morally wrong either. Again, a clear case of slander.
I really do not like being called a "sicko" and "evil" when I have not broken the law and not done anything morally wrong either. Again, a clear case of slander.
Broseph !!fxnDb+Ve4 replied with this 14 years ago, 13 seconds later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #316,671
@316,664 (A)
> Pedophilia is absolutely not the urge to molest a kid.
In your case it is. You just won't let yourself see that what you do is molestation.
> consensual
I don't think you understand why people say that children cannot consent to sex. You just refuse to accept the reason.
> But I've never molested a child or admitted molesting a child, that's a blatant lie. Pure slander.
You just refuse to believe that the things you've done are molestation. Your defense mechanisms to justify your behavior will not let you. That time you tricked your brother into drinking your semen. That was molestation.
> Pedophilia is absolutely not the urge to molest a kid.
In your case it is. You just won't let yourself see that what you do is molestation.
> consensual
I don't think you understand why people say that children cannot consent to sex. You just refuse to accept the reason.
> But I've never molested a child or admitted molesting a child, that's a blatant lie. Pure slander.
You just refuse to believe that the things you've done are molestation. Your defense mechanisms to justify your behavior will not let you. That time you tricked your brother into drinking your semen. That was molestation.
Broseph !!fxnDb+Ve4 double-posted this 14 years ago, 42 seconds later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #316,672
@316,670 (A)
You really are a sicko, and you have done things that are morally wrong, you just can't come to terms with it.
You really are a sicko, and you have done things that are morally wrong, you just can't come to terms with it.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 14 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #316,674
@316,671 (Broseph !!fxnDb+Ve4)
> In your case it is. You just won't let yourself see that what you do is molestation.
What I do? I've never had sex with a kid, where are you getting this from?
> children cannot consent to sex
Yes. Legally. Here is the definition of the word consent:
> con·sent /kənˈsent/
> Noun: Permission for something to happen or agreement to do something.
> Verb: Give permission for something to happen: "he consented to a search by a detective".
> That time you tricked your brother into drinking your semen
Evidently not as he consented to drinking it.
> In your case it is. You just won't let yourself see that what you do is molestation.
What I do? I've never had sex with a kid, where are you getting this from?
> children cannot consent to sex
Yes. Legally. Here is the definition of the word consent:
> con·sent /kənˈsent/
> Noun: Permission for something to happen or agreement to do something.
> Verb: Give permission for something to happen: "he consented to a search by a detective".
> That time you tricked your brother into drinking your semen
Evidently not as he consented to drinking it.
Broseph !!fxnDb+Ve4 replied with this 14 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #316,676
@previous (A)
> kid
You seem to define "kid" as any child so young that you're not attracted to him. In your book a 13-year-old is apparently not a kid because you think they're old enough to consent to having sex with you.
The fact that you only look at the dictionary definition of consent, just proves my point. You don't understand why the law says that children cannot consent. You're choosing to simply ignore the law entirely because it doesn't suit your beliefs.
He did not consent to drinking your semen. Just another example of how convoluted your logic is, sicko. By your definition, if a man puts a roofie in a drink and offers it to a woman, the woman has consented to taking a date rape drug. Do you understand why this is not the case?
> kid
You seem to define "kid" as any child so young that you're not attracted to him. In your book a 13-year-old is apparently not a kid because you think they're old enough to consent to having sex with you.
The fact that you only look at the dictionary definition of consent, just proves my point. You don't understand why the law says that children cannot consent. You're choosing to simply ignore the law entirely because it doesn't suit your beliefs.
He did not consent to drinking your semen. Just another example of how convoluted your logic is, sicko. By your definition, if a man puts a roofie in a drink and offers it to a woman, the woman has consented to taking a date rape drug. Do you understand why this is not the case?
(Edited 1 minute later.)
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 14 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #316,678
@previous (Broseph !!fxnDb+Ve4)
Listen I fully understand and acknowledge why you personally believe children are incapable of consenting. Personally I believe as a general rule of thumb that in order for the child to consent it must be able to verbalize - that's it.
Listen I fully understand and acknowledge why you personally believe children are incapable of consenting. Personally I believe as a general rule of thumb that in order for the child to consent it must be able to verbalize - that's it.
Anonymous N joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 18 seconds later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #316,679
Broseph !!fxnDb+Ve4 replied with this 14 years ago, 24 seconds later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #316,680
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 14 years ago, 54 seconds later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #316,681
Broseph !!fxnDb+Ve4 replied with this 14 years ago, 3 seconds later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #316,682
@316,679 (N)
I'm fascinated by this convoluted logic he uses, and because calling him out on it seems to piss him off.
I'm fascinated by this convoluted logic he uses, and because calling him out on it seems to piss him off.
Anonymous N replied with this 14 years ago, 32 seconds later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #316,683
@316,678 (A)
just real quick what you described is considered grooming by the rest of the world i believe
just real quick what you described is considered grooming by the rest of the world i believe
(Edited 19 seconds later.)
Anonymous E replied with this 14 years ago, 10 seconds later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #316,684
@316,674 (A)
> What I do? I've never had sex with a kid, where are you getting this from?
Where? Here in this thread by you OP #316,008
> No point raping a kid when I can easily find one willing to fuck me
And
> Don't kid yourself, easy to find a teen with a craving for cock if you loiter in the right chatrooms.
So you are open about Kids/Teens as they are all the same in your book/boat
Slander? >Topic: Pedophiles are not evil
Hey I do have money and probably more then you but lets not let that be a pissing contest. You made the headline so I invite you to take me to court and can you imagine the Judge/Jury/Prosecutor/ take on YOU setting up the same argument as the Men who love boys club/group.
They seem to do poorly in court lolo
> What I do? I've never had sex with a kid, where are you getting this from?
Where? Here in this thread by you OP #316,008
> No point raping a kid when I can easily find one willing to fuck me
And
> Don't kid yourself, easy to find a teen with a craving for cock if you loiter in the right chatrooms.
So you are open about Kids/Teens as they are all the same in your book/boat
Slander? >Topic: Pedophiles are not evil
Hey I do have money and probably more then you but lets not let that be a pissing contest. You made the headline so I invite you to take me to court and can you imagine the Judge/Jury/Prosecutor/ take on YOU setting up the same argument as the Men who love boys club/group.
They seem to do poorly in court lolo
Anonymous N replied with this 14 years ago, 40 seconds later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #316,685
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 14 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #316,686
@316,684 (E)
> Where? Here in this thread by you OP #316,008
I didn't post that thread. Absolutely not. Got any evidence? And I stand by my topic headline, someone that has a sexuality they did not choose cannot be evil for that in itself.
> Where? Here in this thread by you OP #316,008
I didn't post that thread. Absolutely not. Got any evidence? And I stand by my topic headline, someone that has a sexuality they did not choose cannot be evil for that in itself.
Anonymous N replied with this 14 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #316,688
ittkook !nH6RAuX8mo replied with this 14 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #316,689
kook !nH6RAuX8mo double-posted this 14 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #316,690
@316,665 (E)
I dont want anyone to be hurt. I'm not approving of child molestation or rape at all. I'm just saying that so many people judge pedophiles by their thoughts and not their actions. When we all know that most people have had disturbing thoughts themselves.
I dont want anyone to be hurt. I'm not approving of child molestation or rape at all. I'm just saying that so many people judge pedophiles by their thoughts and not their actions. When we all know that most people have had disturbing thoughts themselves.
Anonymous E replied with this 14 years ago, 10 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #316,697
@316,008 (A)
"Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 1 day ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post"
> No point raping a kid when I can easily find one willing to fuck me.
Around 16-17 or so from Top. Alzheimer's?
"Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 1 day ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post"
> No point raping a kid when I can easily find one willing to fuck me.
Around 16-17 or so from Top. Alzheimer's?
kook !nH6RAuX8mo replied with this 14 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #316,698
Anonymous E replied with this 14 years ago, 5 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #316,699
@previous (kook !nH6RAuX8mo)
Actually there are two distinct instances and both are highlighted in replies to you.
Reminds me of today and Osama bin Laden shot in the brain one year ago today.
Talking to OP would be similar to Osama bin Laden. Reason is - bin Laden justified the killing of women and children - even those of his own faith during the WTC bombing. All for the greater good. Typical of those into terror.
OP's sickness is one he was born with and has to justify because in his own mind what else can he do. He is doomed yet proud of what he is.
Actually there are two distinct instances and both are highlighted in replies to you.
Reminds me of today and Osama bin Laden shot in the brain one year ago today.
Talking to OP would be similar to Osama bin Laden. Reason is - bin Laden justified the killing of women and children - even those of his own faith during the WTC bombing. All for the greater good. Typical of those into terror.
OP's sickness is one he was born with and has to justify because in his own mind what else can he do. He is doomed yet proud of what he is.
kook !nH6RAuX8mo replied with this 14 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #316,701
@previous (E)
what of others, who aren't proud? they can't help it, you know that. would you be civil to one of those people who dont hurt anyone?
what of others, who aren't proud? they can't help it, you know that. would you be civil to one of those people who dont hurt anyone?
Anonymous E replied with this 14 years ago, 9 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #316,705
@previous (kook !nH6RAuX8mo)
Chicken or Egg?
What percentage of people who lust after children, will never commit the act? I do not know the answer to my own question.
The >"They can't help it" You can apply that to serial killers etc. I cannot argue re the they cannot help it.
They are. Infected with a sickness. Does this sickness end up infecting someone?
So you have a bit of redemption in my book re setting toaster over the line lol. You somehow found a limit - good for you.
Having high moral standards ain't such a bad thing for me to have - that is how I look at it. No saint but sure would never mess with a child. Children should be protected. Yes the United Nations has issues re age of when a kid is not a kid anymore. Usually its a matter of 3rd world under-developed countries and lack of education OR religions that are so fucked up that a girl has to marry the rapist so the family will end up without shame.
Lots of fucked up places on Planet Earth.
Chicken or Egg?
What percentage of people who lust after children, will never commit the act? I do not know the answer to my own question.
The >"They can't help it" You can apply that to serial killers etc. I cannot argue re the they cannot help it.
They are. Infected with a sickness. Does this sickness end up infecting someone?
So you have a bit of redemption in my book re setting toaster over the line lol. You somehow found a limit - good for you.
Having high moral standards ain't such a bad thing for me to have - that is how I look at it. No saint but sure would never mess with a child. Children should be protected. Yes the United Nations has issues re age of when a kid is not a kid anymore. Usually its a matter of 3rd world under-developed countries and lack of education OR religions that are so fucked up that a girl has to marry the rapist so the family will end up without shame.
Lots of fucked up places on Planet Earth.
kook !nH6RAuX8mo replied with this 14 years ago, 9 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #316,712
@previous (E)
they cant help thoughts, they can help actions. I draw the line at actions. I dont need redemption for my feelings on this.
tell me of this sickness. I want to hear about how it's transmitted.
they cant help thoughts, they can help actions. I draw the line at actions. I dont need redemption for my feelings on this.
tell me of this sickness. I want to hear about how it's transmitted.
(Edited 11 seconds later.)
Syntax replied with this 14 years ago, 8 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #316,714
Amazing thread!
(Edited 42 seconds later.)
Anonymous N replied with this 14 years ago, 4 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #316,717
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 14 years ago, 15 hours later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #316,907
> 118 repliesDr Bumhert joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 7 hours later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #317,148
Because you were born a heterosexual, your destiny is to rape and probably kill women. You're genetically fucked up. You're pure evil. You're rotten to the core. There is no hope for you.
Find a friend to load you up with Heroin and lots of booze and have the friend chop your balls off. If that is too much trouble then a bullet to the brain should be sufficient.
Find a friend to load you up with Heroin and lots of booze and have the friend chop your balls off. If that is too much trouble then a bullet to the brain should be sufficient.
Anonymous P joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 1 hour later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #317,248
Why do you do this? My niece began cutting herself after reading your post. Not because she is a stupid bigot, but because she's an impressionable ELEVEN YEAR OLD.
This is straight up hate.
This is straight up hate.
Anonymous Q joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 14 hours later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #317,816
@317,148 (Dr Bumhert)
Heterosexuals are evil though. They'd destroy gays without reason or apology were it not for all the prisons.
Heterosexuals are evil though. They'd destroy gays without reason or apology were it not for all the prisons.