Topic: If not wanting women to have the right to kill their children is the "war on women"...
Anonymous A started this discussion 14 years ago #19,032
…can we call "abortive rights" the war on children?brri !OudrPWaUDQ joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 1 hour later[^] [v] #313,503
I don't know, can me?
soprry, we.
soprry, we.
Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 2 hours later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #313,576
Preventing life is not the same as preventing choice. Nobody has to live with the prevention of life.
Broseph !!fxnDb+Ve4 joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 5 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #313,577
I think the religious right already calls it a war on unborn children.
Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 1 hour later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #313,598
most men on this board would definitely have an abortion if they could get pregnant. you too, even though you'll lie.
Anonymous E double-posted this 14 years ago, 29 seconds later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #313,599
squeegee !firstkPE1Q joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 36 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #313,607
I'd be fine with a war on children. They are just waiting until we're old, sick and weak when they'll steal our jobs, put us in homes and run the world to hell in a handbasket, no, kill as many of the little usurpers as possible.
Anonymous G joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 1 minute later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #313,608
Humanity is wrong to exist.
squeegee !firstkPE1Q replied with this 14 years ago, 35 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #313,614
Also, technically, unborn children are parasites, making it pest control. Which is fine.
(Edited 30 seconds later.)
Anonymous H joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 11 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #313,618
Every time a dude faps & spills his seed, lives are prevented & no one gives a shit.
(Edited 15 seconds later.)
Anonymous E replied with this 14 years ago, 34 seconds later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #313,619
Anonymous G replied with this 14 years ago, 2 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #313,621
@313,618 (H)
But this is wrong. Seeds are seeds, humans are humans. Fetuses are fetuses too, sure, but they're a lot closer to humans than seeds.
But this is wrong. Seeds are seeds, humans are humans. Fetuses are fetuses too, sure, but they're a lot closer to humans than seeds.
Anonymous H replied with this 14 years ago, 5 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #313,624
Anonymous G replied with this 14 years ago, 10 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #313,628
Anonymous I joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 1 minute later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #313,629
@313,577 (Broseph !!fxnDb+Ve4)
> I think the religious right already calls it a war on unborn children.
Not really. I might be committing political suicide by saying this, and be accused of selling out, but here it goes: I want to get away from the Kimmo stylesheet altogether. I want to get away from the idea of being a chan altogether. I want to create a discussion board that is more like a social network than anything else. It would be like Facebook, with the focus being on the board and real discussion rather than it focusing on groups, likes, wall-posts, pokes, games, etc. It would give you the option to post anonymously rather than forcing you to register, but registering and having a profile would be an option. It would be like twitter, but would encourage intelligent conversation rather than 100 character "tweets" that seem to be dumbing down the nation. It would be like a blog, but people would actually care about it, because rather than being a blog in the sense that it's a single website about you, it's interactive and everyone is tied together through the social network. You could have a "friends" list, but it would be more like a list of favorite posters where you watch for their posts/threads, rather than a restrictive list. It will be like Facebook WAS, back when people actually joined groups and went into the discussion tab to have actual discussion, before they started putting ridiculous restrictions on groups and encouraging people to just "like" corporations instead and have you play mindless games so they can sell your information to advertisers. You'd still have the same freedom of speech, and be able to post anything from chan bullshit to legitimate reporters using it as a medium to post their news articles or blogs. It would be like youtube, but the focus would be on discussion rather than video, but the idea of it being user generated content is the same. Privacy would never be an issue, because you'd still have the option to post anonymously and no logging in would be required.
I warned you it was political suicide. I know some of you must think I'm joking and that I just don't get it. I know I probably sound like Kimmo several years ago, posting about stuff where it was obvious to everyone but him that only he thought his ideas were a good idea. The difference is, I'm not a sociopath, I don't want to do this because I think I deserve a billion dollars, I don't think it's guaranteed to be the next big thing, and I understand that it's not for everyone, so I have no intention of spamming my site all over the god damn place trying to attract attention from people who will obviously hate it. I just know there are a lot of people just like me out there who miss the old youtube, miss the old facebook, hate the teenage drama of myspace, and are sickened by the watered down content and pointless updates of twitter. There are people out there who love the free speech of blogs and chan sites, but hate the meaningless shit that fills most chans and the fact that most blogs are just people who only want to talk about themselves or think they're real reporters because they have a website. I know the internet market is already flooded with so many social networking and sharing sites that I might just be insane. Maybe I really am like Kimmo and I'm trying to reinvent the wheel just because there's not a site out there that's not EXACTLY what I want it to be. If that's the case, just say so. If there's a social networking site out there that's ridiculously close to what I'm describing here, just say so, and I'll leave you alone and I'll go there instead. I'm not going to be like Kimmo and go ahead with an idea when everyone tells me it's lame and refuse to take any advice and call anyone who disagree with me a troll, but if you read this and you feel the same way, if your're like me and feel like there are millions of people out there who feel the same way we do, if your're sick of settling for what's already out there and feel like the internet needs a new niche for everyone who is like us...
JOIN ME
Or don't because I realize that was a little over the top.
> I think the religious right already calls it a war on unborn children.
Not really. I might be committing political suicide by saying this, and be accused of selling out, but here it goes: I want to get away from the Kimmo stylesheet altogether. I want to get away from the idea of being a chan altogether. I want to create a discussion board that is more like a social network than anything else. It would be like Facebook, with the focus being on the board and real discussion rather than it focusing on groups, likes, wall-posts, pokes, games, etc. It would give you the option to post anonymously rather than forcing you to register, but registering and having a profile would be an option. It would be like twitter, but would encourage intelligent conversation rather than 100 character "tweets" that seem to be dumbing down the nation. It would be like a blog, but people would actually care about it, because rather than being a blog in the sense that it's a single website about you, it's interactive and everyone is tied together through the social network. You could have a "friends" list, but it would be more like a list of favorite posters where you watch for their posts/threads, rather than a restrictive list. It will be like Facebook WAS, back when people actually joined groups and went into the discussion tab to have actual discussion, before they started putting ridiculous restrictions on groups and encouraging people to just "like" corporations instead and have you play mindless games so they can sell your information to advertisers. You'd still have the same freedom of speech, and be able to post anything from chan bullshit to legitimate reporters using it as a medium to post their news articles or blogs. It would be like youtube, but the focus would be on discussion rather than video, but the idea of it being user generated content is the same. Privacy would never be an issue, because you'd still have the option to post anonymously and no logging in would be required.
I warned you it was political suicide. I know some of you must think I'm joking and that I just don't get it. I know I probably sound like Kimmo several years ago, posting about stuff where it was obvious to everyone but him that only he thought his ideas were a good idea. The difference is, I'm not a sociopath, I don't want to do this because I think I deserve a billion dollars, I don't think it's guaranteed to be the next big thing, and I understand that it's not for everyone, so I have no intention of spamming my site all over the god damn place trying to attract attention from people who will obviously hate it. I just know there are a lot of people just like me out there who miss the old youtube, miss the old facebook, hate the teenage drama of myspace, and are sickened by the watered down content and pointless updates of twitter. There are people out there who love the free speech of blogs and chan sites, but hate the meaningless shit that fills most chans and the fact that most blogs are just people who only want to talk about themselves or think they're real reporters because they have a website. I know the internet market is already flooded with so many social networking and sharing sites that I might just be insane. Maybe I really am like Kimmo and I'm trying to reinvent the wheel just because there's not a site out there that's not EXACTLY what I want it to be. If that's the case, just say so. If there's a social networking site out there that's ridiculously close to what I'm describing here, just say so, and I'll leave you alone and I'll go there instead. I'm not going to be like Kimmo and go ahead with an idea when everyone tells me it's lame and refuse to take any advice and call anyone who disagree with me a troll, but if you read this and you feel the same way, if your're like me and feel like there are millions of people out there who feel the same way we do, if your're sick of settling for what's already out there and feel like the internet needs a new niche for everyone who is like us...
JOIN ME
Or don't because I realize that was a little over the top.
Anonymous H replied with this 14 years ago, 10 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #313,634
@313,628 (G)
Excellent point.
Now trying another tactic ......Which came first chicken or egg?
No Seed no Chicken.
Excellent point.
Now trying another tactic ......Which came first chicken or egg?
No Seed no Chicken.
Anonymous J joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 8 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #313,655
Anonymous G replied with this 14 years ago, 5 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #313,658
Anonymous H replied with this 14 years ago, 10 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #313,665
@previous (G)
Which came first, X that can't come without Y, or Y that can't come without X?
It really all cums down to cum.
Which came first, X that can't come without Y, or Y that can't come without X?
It really all cums down to cum.
Anonymous G replied with this 14 years ago, 10 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #313,672
@previous (H)
No, cum is cum. People are people. Saying that all people come from cum is inaccurate and grossly patriarchal.
No, cum is cum. People are people. Saying that all people come from cum is inaccurate and grossly patriarchal.
Broseph !!fxnDb+Ve4 replied with this 14 years ago, 2 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #313,673
@previous (G)
Every sperm is sacred. Every sperm is great. If a sperm is wasted, God gets quite irate. Let the heathen spill theirs on the dusty ground. God shall make them pay for each sperm that can't be found.
Every sperm is sacred. Every sperm is great. If a sperm is wasted, God gets quite irate. Let the heathen spill theirs on the dusty ground. God shall make them pay for each sperm that can't be found.
Anonymous I replied with this 14 years ago, 16 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #313,684
@previous (Broseph !!fxnDb+Ve4)
> Every sperm is sacred. Every sperm is great. If a sperm is wasted, God gets quite irate. Let the heathen spill theirs on the dusty ground. God shall make them pay for each sperm that can't be found.
Not really. I might be committing political suicide by saying this, and be accused of selling out, but here it goes: I want to get away from the Kimmo stylesheet altogether. I want to get away from the idea of being a chan altogether. I want to create a discussion board that is more like a social network than anything else. It would be like Facebook, with the focus being on the board and real discussion rather than it focusing on groups, likes, wall-posts, pokes, games, etc. It would give you the option to post anonymously rather than forcing you to register, but registering and having a profile would be an option. It would be like twitter, but would encourage intelligent conversation rather than 100 character "tweets" that seem to be dumbing down the nation. It would be like a blog, but people would actually care about it, because rather than being a blog in the sense that it's a single website about you, it's interactive and everyone is tied together through the social network. You could have a "friends" list, but it would be more like a list of favorite posters where you watch for their posts/threads, rather than a restrictive list. It will be like Facebook WAS, back when people actually joined groups and went into the discussion tab to have actual discussion, before they started putting ridiculous restrictions on groups and encouraging people to just "like" corporations instead and have you play mindless games so they can sell your information to advertisers. You'd still have the same freedom of speech, and be able to post anything from chan bullshit to legitimate reporters using it as a medium to post their news articles or blogs. It would be like youtube, but the focus would be on discussion rather than video, but the idea of it being user generated content is the same. Privacy would never be an issue, because you'd still have the option to post anonymously and no logging in would be required.
I warned you it was political suicide. I know some of you must think I'm joking and that I just don't get it. I know I probably sound like Kimmo several years ago, posting about stuff where it was obvious to everyone but him that only he thought his ideas were a good idea. The difference is, I'm not a sociopath, I don't want to do this because I think I deserve a billion dollars, I don't think it's guaranteed to be the next big thing, and I understand that it's not for everyone, so I have no intention of spamming my site all over the god damn place trying to attract attention from people who will obviously hate it. I just know there are a lot of people just like me out there who miss the old youtube, miss the old facebook, hate the teenage drama of myspace, and are sickened by the watered down content and pointless updates of twitter. There are people out there who love the free speech of blogs and chan sites, but hate the meaningless shit that fills most chans and the fact that most blogs are just people who only want to talk about themselves or think they're real reporters because they have a website. I know the internet market is already flooded with so many social networking and sharing sites that I might just be insane. Maybe I really am like Kimmo and I'm trying to reinvent the wheel just because there's not a site out there that's not EXACTLY what I want it to be. If that's the case, just say so. If there's a social networking site out there that's ridiculously close to what I'm describing here, just say so, and I'll leave you alone and I'll go there instead. I'm not going to be like Kimmo and go ahead with an idea when everyone tells me it's lame and refuse to take any advice and call anyone who disagree with me a troll, but if you read this and you feel the same way, if your're like me and feel like there are millions of people out there who feel the same way we do, if your're sick of settling for what's already out there and feel like the internet needs a new niche for everyone who is like us...
JOIN ME
Or don't because I realize that was a little over the top.
> Every sperm is sacred. Every sperm is great. If a sperm is wasted, God gets quite irate. Let the heathen spill theirs on the dusty ground. God shall make them pay for each sperm that can't be found.
Not really. I might be committing political suicide by saying this, and be accused of selling out, but here it goes: I want to get away from the Kimmo stylesheet altogether. I want to get away from the idea of being a chan altogether. I want to create a discussion board that is more like a social network than anything else. It would be like Facebook, with the focus being on the board and real discussion rather than it focusing on groups, likes, wall-posts, pokes, games, etc. It would give you the option to post anonymously rather than forcing you to register, but registering and having a profile would be an option. It would be like twitter, but would encourage intelligent conversation rather than 100 character "tweets" that seem to be dumbing down the nation. It would be like a blog, but people would actually care about it, because rather than being a blog in the sense that it's a single website about you, it's interactive and everyone is tied together through the social network. You could have a "friends" list, but it would be more like a list of favorite posters where you watch for their posts/threads, rather than a restrictive list. It will be like Facebook WAS, back when people actually joined groups and went into the discussion tab to have actual discussion, before they started putting ridiculous restrictions on groups and encouraging people to just "like" corporations instead and have you play mindless games so they can sell your information to advertisers. You'd still have the same freedom of speech, and be able to post anything from chan bullshit to legitimate reporters using it as a medium to post their news articles or blogs. It would be like youtube, but the focus would be on discussion rather than video, but the idea of it being user generated content is the same. Privacy would never be an issue, because you'd still have the option to post anonymously and no logging in would be required.
I warned you it was political suicide. I know some of you must think I'm joking and that I just don't get it. I know I probably sound like Kimmo several years ago, posting about stuff where it was obvious to everyone but him that only he thought his ideas were a good idea. The difference is, I'm not a sociopath, I don't want to do this because I think I deserve a billion dollars, I don't think it's guaranteed to be the next big thing, and I understand that it's not for everyone, so I have no intention of spamming my site all over the god damn place trying to attract attention from people who will obviously hate it. I just know there are a lot of people just like me out there who miss the old youtube, miss the old facebook, hate the teenage drama of myspace, and are sickened by the watered down content and pointless updates of twitter. There are people out there who love the free speech of blogs and chan sites, but hate the meaningless shit that fills most chans and the fact that most blogs are just people who only want to talk about themselves or think they're real reporters because they have a website. I know the internet market is already flooded with so many social networking and sharing sites that I might just be insane. Maybe I really am like Kimmo and I'm trying to reinvent the wheel just because there's not a site out there that's not EXACTLY what I want it to be. If that's the case, just say so. If there's a social networking site out there that's ridiculously close to what I'm describing here, just say so, and I'll leave you alone and I'll go there instead. I'm not going to be like Kimmo and go ahead with an idea when everyone tells me it's lame and refuse to take any advice and call anyone who disagree with me a troll, but if you read this and you feel the same way, if your're like me and feel like there are millions of people out there who feel the same way we do, if your're sick of settling for what's already out there and feel like the internet needs a new niche for everyone who is like us...
JOIN ME
Or don't because I realize that was a little over the top.
Anonymous K joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 3 hours later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #313,779
What the fuck is the "war on women"?
squeegee !firstkPE1Q replied with this 14 years ago, 13 minutes later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #313,787
@previous (K)
Some stupid election year bullshit dreamt up by the media to distract us from the real wars we're actually fighting in real life.
Some stupid election year bullshit dreamt up by the media to distract us from the real wars we're actually fighting in real life.
Anonymous K replied with this 14 years ago, 2 minutes later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #313,788
@previous (squeegee !firstkPE1Q)
A "war on women" still sounds fucking stupid, why wage war on one half of humanity that is responsible for birthing new humans?
A "war on women" still sounds fucking stupid, why wage war on one half of humanity that is responsible for birthing new humans?
(Edited 35 seconds later.)
squeegee !firstkPE1Q replied with this 14 years ago, 9 minutes later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #313,790
Anonymous H replied with this 14 years ago, 1 hour later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #313,804
Vaginas need and demand respect! None of us would be here otherwise.
Anonymous E replied with this 14 years ago, 4 hours later, 16 hours after the original post[^] [v] #313,853
Anonymous G replied with this 14 years ago, 15 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #314,052
Anonymous L joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 1 hour later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #314,119
Anonymous E replied with this 14 years ago, 7 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #314,230
Anonymous M joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 2 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #314,288
because unborn babies aren't children