Lee O'Nidas !nBpim1wazU joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 4 hours later, 8 hours after the original post[^][v]#313,444
It's only grooming if you want to have sex with the child.
Many adults are mentors for kids. Hell, even MacGyver had a little brother from that little brother program.
Anonymous D replied with this 14 years ago, 1 hour later, 10 hours after the original post[^][v]#313,491
@previous (Lee O'Nidas !nBpim1wazU)
OP knows better than you. All interactions between people over the age of 18 and people under the age of 18 are criminal ipso facto.
squeegee !firstkPE1Q joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 7 hours later, 17 hours after the original post[^][v]#313,616
@previous (D)
Only if the person is a pedophile. Then you'd be right. But how to mark them? A Tatoo? A Brand? Idk, some kind of mutilation should be fine.
Anonymous G joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 3 minutes later, 17 hours after the original post[^][v]#313,620
@previous (squeegee !firstkPE1Q)
They can be made to be a pedophile under the law for merely attempting to engage in sex with a minor. We're talking about people who've actually had sex. Guilt is pre-established.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 14 years ago, 2 minutes later, 17 hours after the original post[^][v]#313,622
@previous (G)
I prefer to police this matters through peer groups. like when MM was kicked from the church for getting too friendly with the young girls. no cops needed, no cops called.