Topic: is it just me or does every jason statham film seem the same?

Anonymous A started this discussion 14 years ago #18,908

i mean i like most of them. transporter and crank were really good imo but i just saw the trailers for safe and i mean it looks like a carbon copy of everything else he does

Poll option	Votes	Percentage
yes	2	25%
no	3	38%
thanks	3	38%

Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 47 minutes later[^] [v] #312,226

> forgot dogbears option

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 14 years ago, 41 seconds later, 48 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #312,227

@previous (B)
irrelevant

Broseph !!fxnDb+Ve4 joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 1 hour later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #312,247

You seem to have forgotten Snatch. He plays quite a different role in that one.

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 14 years ago, 51 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #312,248

@previous (Broseph !!fxnDb+Ve4)
i could have also mentioned lock stock and layer cake but i didnt, broheim

edit: he wasnt in layer cake my bad

(Edited 32 seconds later.)

Broseph !!fxnDb+Ve4 replied with this 14 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #312,249

@previous (A)
Wouldn't you agree that those are pretty different from Transporter and Crank?

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 14 years ago, 41 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #312,250

@previous (Broseph !!fxnDb+Ve4)
those were in his early career. i'm talking about since then and everything after

Broseph !!fxnDb+Ve4 replied with this 14 years ago, 2 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #312,253

@previous (A)
Hmmm, yeah, I agree that he played better, more interesting roles earlier in his career, and now he's just the stereotypical tough guy in testosterone-soaked shitfests they call movies.

Anonymous B replied with this 14 years ago, 29 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #312,260

@312,227 (A)
> never irrelevent

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 14 years ago, 2 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #312,261

@previous (B)
> always irrelevant

Anonymous B replied with this 14 years ago, 23 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #312,263

@previous (A)
> never irrelevent

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 14 years ago, 17 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #312,266

@previous (B)

> > never irrelevent

> >>always irrelevant

Anonymous B replied with this 14 years ago, 3 hours later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #312,310

@previous (A)
> never irrelevent

VAR !hEyBrieeXM joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 1 hour later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #312,317

irrellaphant.png

dw joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 44 minutes later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #312,325

thanks i dont know who that is

Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 16 minutes later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #312,329

@OP
I cannot disagree with you but I love his films. They are like a guilty pleasure.

Anonymous G joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 3 hours later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #312,349

This may shock you OP, but he's not a real actor. His artistic range is exactly ZERO.

He's more like a manequin with lines. Which is all women really want in a man anyhow.

Anonymous H joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 33 minutes later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #312,355

@312,325 (dw)
www.google.com

dw replied with this 14 years ago, 36 minutes later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #312,377

@previous (H)
i do not care who that is tho

Minichan