Topic: Arizona law says women are pregnant two weeks before they even have sex.
Ks !KansasxqvM started this discussion 14 years ago #18,820
Or some shit like that. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/deborah-stambler/arizona-house-bill-2036_b_1422454.html?
The bill that was signed into law today.
http://www.azleg.gov/legtext/50leg/2r/bills/hb2036s.pdf
This shit isn't even logical, yet it's law. Fuck yeah America.
Stealth joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 4 minutes later[^] [v] #311,150
I am banging my fist into my forehead and asking myself where do these anal retentive politicians, get off coming up with this kind of crapola.
Broseph !!fxnDb+Ve4 joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 20 minutes later, 25 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #311,151
Because the god damn Christians think you're legally pregnant 2 weeks before God planned on the child being conceived.
(Edited 40 seconds later.)
Stealth replied with this 14 years ago, 5 minutes later, 31 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #311,152
@previous (Broseph !!fxnDb+Ve4)
Girls/Women will now have to register the due date of period. If they are irregular they will .....Not sure where this goes Hummmmm ---- OK Just figured the next step out. Arizona will be the 1st state of this century to attempt to sever ties to the USA and go it alone.
Girls/Women will now have to register the due date of period. If they are irregular they will .....Not sure where this goes Hummmmm ---- OK Just figured the next step out. Arizona will be the 1st state of this century to attempt to sever ties to the USA and go it alone.
squeegee !firstkPE1Q joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 7 minutes later, 38 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #311,154
@previous (Stealth)
It'll save the lives of many horribly disfigured and genetically diseased children. Those poor babys with their brains outside their body deserve to live too!!
It'll save the lives of many horribly disfigured and genetically diseased children. Those poor babys with their brains outside their body deserve to live too!!
Broseph !!fxnDb+Ve4 replied with this 14 years ago, 29 seconds later, 39 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #311,155
@311,152 (Stealth)
That's a good point about irregular periods. There are also some women who don't get their period but can still get pregnant. Seems like everything they're trying to do in Arizona is bullshit. The article said something about women having to show their employer that they're taking birth control for things like ovarian cysts rather than for preventing pregnancy. Arizona apparently thinks employers have a right to discriminate against employers who take birth control.
That's a good point about irregular periods. There are also some women who don't get their period but can still get pregnant. Seems like everything they're trying to do in Arizona is bullshit. The article said something about women having to show their employer that they're taking birth control for things like ovarian cysts rather than for preventing pregnancy. Arizona apparently thinks employers have a right to discriminate against employers who take birth control.
Stealth replied with this 14 years ago, 8 minutes later, 47 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #311,156
Janice K. Brewer the Gov of Arizona - Best argument for who should have been aborted 6 months before her birth.
Negi Springfield !aeNZeP7XP2 joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 6 hours later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #311,293
vocalon !M9.6XYhKxM joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 1 minute later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #311,294
Anonymous G joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 2 hours later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #311,311
What's the alternative way of dating the start of a pregnancy?
Anonymous G double-posted this 14 years ago, 2 minutes later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #311,312
@311,155 (Broseph !!fxnDb+Ve4)
> Legislation to allow businesses to opt out of providing contraception health-care coverage will likely be revived next week, but the sponsor plans to amend it so that it applies to only religious-based employers such as St. Vincent de Paul.
> House Bill 2625 in its current form would allow any business or insurance company to opt out for religious reasons. The business or insurance company would still have to cover any contraception prescribed for reasons other than to prevent pregnancy or cause an abortion. In such cases, the patient would cover the cost and submit a reimbursement request to the insurance company.
Educate yourself before you attempt to educate others.
> Legislation to allow businesses to opt out of providing contraception health-care coverage will likely be revived next week, but the sponsor plans to amend it so that it applies to only religious-based employers such as St. Vincent de Paul.
> House Bill 2625 in its current form would allow any business or insurance company to opt out for religious reasons. The business or insurance company would still have to cover any contraception prescribed for reasons other than to prevent pregnancy or cause an abortion. In such cases, the patient would cover the cost and submit a reimbursement request to the insurance company.
Educate yourself before you attempt to educate others.
Anonymous I joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 12 hours later, 21 hours after the original post[^] [v] #311,450
I'm sorry KS but I simply cannot share your outrage. You see, I delight in the abuse of power and the chaos which ensues as a result. People deserve to be punished for giving up on the idea of limited government, and for naively believing ever more laws can solve all the problems of the world.