Broseph !!fxnDb+Ve4 joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 16 minutes later[^][v]#310,835
What the fuck does that even mean?
Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 3 minutes later, 20 minutes after the original post[^][v]#310,837
@previous (Broseph !!fxnDb+Ve4)
orgasm without ejaculation, you fucktard
Broseph !!fxnDb+Ve4 replied with this 14 years ago, 1 minute later, 21 minutes after the original post[^][v]#310,839
@previous (C)
a) That's not what he said
b) That sounds fucking terrible
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 14 years ago, 17 minutes later, 39 minutes after the original post[^][v]#310,853
@310,837 (C)
Exactly how I meant it. I even mentioned meditation and Tai Chi as the cause :)
@previous (Broseph !!fxnDb+Ve4)
She probably took it like this.
Broseph !!fxnDb+Ve4 replied with this 14 years ago, 4 minutes later, 43 minutes after the original post[^][v]#310,856
@previous (A)
You should have said "orgasm without ejaculating" instead of "orgasm without climaxing." That would have been clearer and she might not have taken it as badly. She might have been offended by your statement because it made her feel that she's not adequate enough to make you ejaculate.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 14 years ago, 2 minutes later, 46 minutes after the original post[^][v]#310,859
> "I'm so glad I've finally learned how to have an orgasm without climaxing"
er wait one minute. Waaaayyyyyyy back pre teen I did that. No mess to clean up.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 14 years ago, 34 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^][v]#310,918
@previous (F)
lol she asked why and that was one of the reasons I gave haha, the lack of cleanup idea, that is
(Edited 32 seconds later.)
Anonymous G joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 41 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^][v]#310,942
Why are you still talking to her at that point? Beta as fuck....
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 14 years ago, 5 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^][v]#310,944
@previous (G)
Lol update, she wants to fuck me again and again, according to her :D
kook !uK5to98ywY joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 6 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^][v]#310,950
@310,942 (G)
why do you speak with them at all? whores charge by the hour dumbass. it's called time management for pimps.
Anonymous G replied with this 14 years ago, 52 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^][v]#310,967
@previous (kook !uK5to98ywY)
To get them into bed. I wouldn't pay for it. Well, I couldn't pay for it often, so it's just easier to pick chicks up. They're probnaly not as good in bed as prostitutes, but I never need to use a condom. They're also better looking an younger.
Anonymous G double-posted this 14 years ago, 1 minute later, 4 hours after the original post[^][v]#310,968
@310,944 (A)
dont fall into the trap of letting that stop you from getting more pussy. You can still fuck her when you cant get something new. If you don't use a skill, you lose it. Unless you are looking for a relationship, which is stupid. Humans aren't meant to have one partner.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 14 years ago, 59 seconds later, 4 hours after the original post[^][v]#310,970
@previous (G)
She told me she wants to fuck me every day that she knows me :)
kook !uK5to98ywY replied with this 14 years ago, 3 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^][v]#310,973
Anonymous G replied with this 14 years ago, 1 hour later, 5 hours after the original post[^][v]#311,007
@previous (kook !uK5to98ywY)
I think prostitutes make you wear condoms, and if they don't I think I'd want to use one (for what I could afford. If I was dropping a few grand, I wouldn't worry).
Anonymous G double-posted this 14 years ago, 31 seconds later, 5 hours after the original post[^][v]#311,008
@310,970 (A)
Good. It's nice to have a few of those kinds of arrangements.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 14 years ago, 14 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^][v]#311,013
kook !uK5to98ywY replied with this 14 years ago, 8 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^][v]#311,015
@311,007 (G)
do you wear them with non hooker females?
Anonymous G replied with this 14 years ago, 16 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^][v]#311,020
@previous (kook !uK5to98ywY)
When I can, yes. I'm not concerned. If there are no outbreaks going on, I could care less about HIV/HEPC.
kook !uK5to98ywY replied with this 14 years ago, 2 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^][v]#311,025
@previous (G)
when you can? how would you know about these outbreaks? dont you know that those things have to start with someone?
Anonymous G replied with this 14 years ago, 5 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^][v]#311,028
@previous (kook !uK5to98ywY)
I mean a local outbreak in someone's pants. I'm unconcerned if everything looks clean. The women I score are usually pretty wasted, so asking if they have anything isnt reliable.
green !YzDEWwv9Z2 joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 3 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^][v]#311,030
Anonymous J joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 9 hours later, 16 hours after the original post[^][v]#311,116
@310,944 (A)
Well than you definitely bruised her self esteem. Now she's got something to prove. I suppose even a beta fag can get lucky unintentionally.
Dead !Pool7hVoC2 (OP) replied with this 14 years ago, 1 minute later, 16 hours after the original post[^][v]#311,117
Dead !Pool7hVoC2 (OP) replied with this 14 years ago, 39 seconds later, 16 hours after the original post[^][v]#311,120
@previous (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
Is he mad that I'm actually having sex, after over a year?
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 14 years ago, 1 minute later, 16 hours after the original post[^][v]#311,121
@previous (Dead !Pool7hVoC2)
I don't know. Maybe he thinks you are banging his mom.
Dead !Pool7hVoC2 (OP) replied with this 14 years ago, 1 minute later, 16 hours after the original post[^][v]#311,122
@previous (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
She's a little to young to have a child, well not by today's standards, but too young to have a child who's on the internet already
Broseph !!fxnDb+Ve4 replied with this 14 years ago, 46 minutes later, 17 hours after the original post[^][v]#311,124
@previous (Dead !Pool7hVoC2)
Dude, you're banging that 16/17-year-old?
Dead !Pool7hVoC2 (OP) replied with this 14 years ago, 2 minutes later, 17 hours after the original post[^][v]#311,125