Topic: WHOAH. BACK THE FUCK UP.
Falco !PZmcClOUDk started this discussion 14 years ago #18,596
ARE YOU SUGGESTING THE ONLY ETHICAL ECONOMIC ARRANGEMENT IS PROFIT SHARE?
THE DIFFERENCE, YOU COCK SUCKING COMMIE, IS THAT A PRIVATE CEO IS USING HIS OWN MONEY, WHEREAS A PUBLIC CEO IS USING SHAREHOLDERS MONEY. NEPOTISM DOES NOT LEAD TO THE BEST ECONOMIC OUTCOME FOR THE SHAREHOLDERS WHICH IS WHY IT IS UNETHICAL.
YOU ARE COMPLETELY IDIOTIC. MAYBE THEY STILL HAVE JOBS FOR COMMUNIST ECONOMISTS IN NORTH KOREA.
THE DIFFERENCE, YOU COCK SUCKING COMMIE, IS THAT A PRIVATE CEO IS USING HIS OWN MONEY, WHEREAS A PUBLIC CEO IS USING SHAREHOLDERS MONEY. NEPOTISM DOES NOT LEAD TO THE BEST ECONOMIC OUTCOME FOR THE SHAREHOLDERS WHICH IS WHY IT IS UNETHICAL.
YOU ARE COMPLETELY IDIOTIC. MAYBE THEY STILL HAVE JOBS FOR COMMUNIST ECONOMISTS IN NORTH KOREA.
HaikerensGuide !0VegJ9Jl.Q joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 31 seconds later[^] [v] #308,230
what
Falco !PZmcClOUDk (OP) replied with this 14 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 minute after the original post[^] [v] #308,232
ARE YOU SUGGESTING THE ONLY ETHICAL PENIS ARRANGEMENT IS PENIS SHARE?
THE DIFFERENCE, YOU COCK SUCKING PENIS, IS THAT A PRIVATE PENIS IS USING HIS OWN PENIS, WHEREAS A PUBLIC PENIS IS USING SHAREHOLDERS PENISES. NEPOTISM DOES NOT LEAD TO THE BEST ECONOMIC PENIS FOR THE SHAREHOLDERS WHICH IS WHY IT IS UNETHICAL.
YOU ARE COMPLETELY IDIOTIC. MAYBE THEY STILL HAVE PENISES FOR COMMUNIST PENISES IN NORTH KOREA.
THE DIFFERENCE, YOU COCK SUCKING PENIS, IS THAT A PRIVATE PENIS IS USING HIS OWN PENIS, WHEREAS A PUBLIC PENIS IS USING SHAREHOLDERS PENISES. NEPOTISM DOES NOT LEAD TO THE BEST ECONOMIC PENIS FOR THE SHAREHOLDERS WHICH IS WHY IT IS UNETHICAL.
YOU ARE COMPLETELY IDIOTIC. MAYBE THEY STILL HAVE PENISES FOR COMMUNIST PENISES IN NORTH KOREA.
Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 3 minutes later, 5 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #308,236
Falco !PZmcClOUDk (OP) replied with this 14 years ago, 2 minutes later, 7 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #308,237
@previous (C)
ARE YOU SUGGESTING THE ONLY ETHICAL FART ARRANGEMENT IS FART SHARE?
THE DIFFERENCE, YOU COCK SUCKING FART, IS THAT A PRIVATE FART IS USING HIS OWN FART, WHEREAS A PUBLIC FART IS USING SHAREHOLDERS FARTS. NEPOTISM DOES NOT LEAD TO THE BEST ECONOMIC FART FOR THE SHAREHOLDERS WHICH IS WHY IT IS UNETHICAL.
YOU ARE COMPLETELY IDIOTIC. MAYBE THEY STILL HAVE FARTS FOR COMMUNIST FARTS IN NORTH KOREA.
ARE YOU SUGGESTING THE ONLY ETHICAL FART ARRANGEMENT IS FART SHARE?
THE DIFFERENCE, YOU COCK SUCKING FART, IS THAT A PRIVATE FART IS USING HIS OWN FART, WHEREAS A PUBLIC FART IS USING SHAREHOLDERS FARTS. NEPOTISM DOES NOT LEAD TO THE BEST ECONOMIC FART FOR THE SHAREHOLDERS WHICH IS WHY IT IS UNETHICAL.
YOU ARE COMPLETELY IDIOTIC. MAYBE THEY STILL HAVE FARTS FOR COMMUNIST FARTS IN NORTH KOREA.
(Edited 2 minutes later.)
