Topic: Attn Fox, Advi: I don't know where to go from this
Falco !PZmcClOUDk started this discussion 14 years ago#18,575
"Enter the "Burned Furs", a splinter Furry group made up of people who have an obsession with fuzzy tiger head people but who are tired of being thought of as abnormal. Their stance is that it's perfectly okay to spend eight weeks and five hundred dollars on a homemade badger suit so that you can wear it in public, but if you have sex in it you're just weird. It's like a Trek fan saying "Well, sure, I'm fluent in Klingon, but that guy used it for his wedding ceremony! Let's all mock him!" The very fact that the Burned Furs had to organize makes one doubt their proposition that Furryfolk aren't primarily in it for the eros. Nobody has had to form a group to convince people that concert pianists aren't sexual deviants. If I came across an organization arguing that people who sell produce at Farmer's Markets aren't all actually fucking their vegetables, I'd certainly start examining my cauliflower more closely before cooking it."
Cause I pretty much believe in what Burned Furs had to say, yet this makes complete sense.
Falco !PZmcClOUDk (OP) replied with this 14 years ago, 2 minutes later, 18 minutes after the original post[^][v]#307,872
@previous (C)
exactly. It's a bummer but there you go.
Anonymous B replied with this 14 years ago, 4 minutes later, 22 minutes after the original post[^][v]#307,874
Great sex is sweaty enough as it is. Wearing fur would only make it wetter in all the wrong places.
Of course if one had a deep freezer?
Anonymous C replied with this 14 years ago, 1 minute later, 23 minutes after the original post[^][v]#307,875
@307,872 (Falco !PZmcClOUDk)
But that's also somewhat voluntarily given away with the hype that comes with the territory. The only thing that I find really annoying by some furries is this persecution complex as if it's on par with centuries of racial oppression. That's an extreme but I'm sure there's probably many self-loathing furries out there.
Anonymous C double-posted this 14 years ago, 1 minute later, 24 minutes after the original post[^][v]#307,877
@307,874 (B)
Maybe some of them hate having to take their suits to the dry cleaners all the time and trying to explain to the staff where the stains come from.
Anonymous B replied with this 14 years ago, 6 minutes later, 31 minutes after the original post[^][v]#307,881
@previous (C)
Judgmental dry cleaners? Any single type of stain in a dry cleaners life is ....Leaving it as just that.
Falco !PZmcClOUDk (OP) replied with this 14 years ago, 1 minute later, 32 minutes after the original post[^][v]#307,882
@307,875 (C)
That goddamn persecution complex. I think it's widespread in varying degrees. More with younger kids who just discovered the internet. A lot of furs can't comprehend why anyone would hate or be made uncomfortable by something they love so much, and that's very selfish; especially when they're shoving it down other people's throats. It's why I don't contribute much in furry threads. They think anyone who hates furries are automatically ignorant or belligerent and should not be taken seriously when there are plenty of reasons to hate the furry fandom as a whole as it is. -I've been there.
Initially I get a little confused when my friend Ray gets very upset by anything furry. But why is that her problem? It's mine, and it's my responsibility to be careful about my own furriness when I'm around her. Because she's my friend and I respect her.
And for some people, they just don't care when they offend people with furry shit. They're just comfortable with who they are. And that's like whatever, fine. Sometimes I feel that way in certain circumstances. -But nobody should be surprised or feel persecuted when people tell them what they really think of it. Because usually it's nothing positive.
(Edited 1 minute later.)
Fox !FXYGNx1XR. joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 5 minutes later, 38 minutes after the original post[^][v]#307,885
Anonymous C replied with this 14 years ago, 1 hour later, 2 hours after the original post[^][v]#307,927
@307,881 (B)
I meant the owner being more self-conscious, not necessarily the staff being judgmental but whatever.
advi !!3gpAcg/hF joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 48 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^][v]#307,947
@307,882 (Falco !PZmcClOUDk)
It's a two way street. Sure, it's a person's responsibility to be considerate of others, but you also need to accept that there are a lot of people in the world that will do things you don't like.
Furries prancing around like dorks in a city that happens to be host to the latest convention? If that bothers you, then it's perfectly understandable--I'd probably punch a guy in the dick if he bothered me in a fursuit in the middle of a public square. But a lot of the community coddling and victim complex comes from buttautismal kewl2haet kids online, and the human brain is wired to assume that these kinds of attacks are personal and not simply for shits and giggles.
(Edited 33 seconds later.)
Anonymous C replied with this 14 years ago, 10 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^][v]#307,949
@previous (advi !!3gpAcg/hF)
Which is a pretty good point. The majority of the internet communities I've seen that are invented purely to troll other furry communities are not because of an innate hatred of furries themselves, but the fact that many of them take it to such a deep and personal level that you may as well be pissing on their mother's grave. Most of these people I've spoken to can't even really identify a strong feeling towards even casual furries but this persecution complex alone is enough to constantly grief the shit out of them because of how quickly furry supporters/hardcore lifestyle enablers whiteknight this fact alone. Hijacking someone's furry chan is one thing, it's another to attend a furry convention with a firehose and start spraying them down like it was the next race riot.
Broseph !!fxnDb+Ve4 joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 18 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^][v]#307,953
If people want to have sex in fursuits and watch furry porn, then that's their own god damned business and no one has a right to tell them they can't. I do sympathize with those "furries" who dislike being labeled and stereotyped as sexual deviants when they just like costumes, but ffs they act like furries have a good name to be tarnished.
Falco !PZmcClOUDk (OP) replied with this 14 years ago, 1 hour later, 4 hours after the original post[^][v]#307,985
@previous (Broseph !!fxnDb+Ve4)
Completely agree. I've spoken with ones who would even say it's "family friendly". Try figuring that one out, because I couldn't.
Anonymous G joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 36 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^][v]#307,991
@307,953 (Broseph !!fxnDb+Ve4) > If people want to have sex in fursuits and watch furry porn, then that's their own god damned business > that's their own god damned business
Precisely. But, this is the way it should stay. A lot of the hate is brought on by those who think it should be everyone and their mother's business, acting like it's something to be proud of and flaunt, and THEN cry "fursecution!!1!". I'd actually equate this to them acting like oppressed homosex, rather than the racial oppression Anonymous C spoke of.
advi !!3gpAcg/hF replied with this 14 years ago, 14 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^][v]#307,992
@307,985 (Falco !PZmcClOUDk) > I've spoken with ones who would even say it's "family friendly". Try figuring that one out, because I couldn't.
Barney? @previous (G)
Every subculture has a vocal minority that can't accept criticism, from technology to politics to creative media. I'd imagine a lot of the public fursuiter types don't give a damn about what bystanders think.