Topic: Tomorrow I'm going to a gay therapist.
Handel !khEOdtKF56 started this discussion 14 years ago #18,502
It's been a very long week.
I came out as gay, dropped out of college (For the second time in a month) and told my mam I was depressed (and in so many words suicidal). I went to a doctor and a councillor who both had conflicting opinions on how I should approach my issues. So tomorrow I gonna go see this guy (nearly against my own will) and see what he has to say.
INB4 I'm popping happy pills for the rest of my life.
/BAWWWWWWWWWWW
I came out as gay, dropped out of college (For the second time in a month) and told my mam I was depressed (and in so many words suicidal). I went to a doctor and a councillor who both had conflicting opinions on how I should approach my issues. So tomorrow I gonna go see this guy (nearly against my own will) and see what he has to say.
INB4 I'm popping happy pills for the rest of my life.
/BAWWWWWWWWWWW
Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 5 minutes later[^] [v] #306,863
Hope things turn around for you.
Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 4 minutes later, 10 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #306,867
> gay therapist
It's good to see that gay science in general has come so far. to4str's tireless research has obviously paid off.
@previous (B)
(Citing a deleted or non-existent reply.)
Oh hey, you didn't have to wait 15 seconds to post that again.
sup sim or r04r?
It's good to see that gay science in general has come so far. to4str's tireless research has obviously paid off.
@previous (B)
(Citing a deleted or non-existent reply.)
Oh hey, you didn't have to wait 15 seconds to post that again.
sup sim or r04r?
Negi Springfield !aeNZeP7XP2 joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 2 hours later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #306,926
@OP
Why did you want to come out as gay?
I don't get why people chose to identify as homosexual, when it is clearly a destructive lifestyle. Some people aren't interested in relationships of any type. Doesn't mean you're gay or anything. Just means you don't care about girls or anything to do with them. Why attach a label to that?
Serious question by the way.
Why did you want to come out as gay?
I don't get why people chose to identify as homosexual, when it is clearly a destructive lifestyle. Some people aren't interested in relationships of any type. Doesn't mean you're gay or anything. Just means you don't care about girls or anything to do with them. Why attach a label to that?
Serious question by the way.
Anonymous C replied with this 14 years ago, 6 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #306,927
@previous (Negi Springfield !aeNZeP7XP2)
Stop attention-seeking.
@OP
But seriously, hope it turns out okay. The therapy should help you.
Stop attention-seeking.
@OP
But seriously, hope it turns out okay. The therapy should help you.
Negi Springfield !aeNZeP7XP2 replied with this 14 years ago, 3 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #306,928
@previous (C)It's attention seeking to ask why a person would want to be openly homosexual.
I know people have imitated me, but it's actually me this time. How is my question attention seeking? I think it's more attention seeking to broadcast one's clearly made up sexuality. That's attention seeking.
HaikerensGuide !0VegJ9Jl.Q joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 6 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #306,931
i guess one could say
op's a bit
ginger beer
op's a bit
ginger beer
(Edited 10 seconds later.)
Anonymous B replied with this 14 years ago, 34 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #306,935
@306,926 (Negi Springfield !aeNZeP7XP2)> I don't get why people chose to identify as homosexual, when it is clearly a destructive lifestyle.
Negi Springfield !aeNZeP7XP2 replied with this 14 years ago, 9 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #306,938
@previous (B)It is destructive to one's peace of mind when one has to deal with irregular thoughts.
To be homosexual is like having a desire to drink human blood, which is weird and not common. Also, having sexual attraction to one's own gender has a bad association with it. One shouldn't entertain such notions in the same way one would disregard thoughts of violence and murder.
Anonymous B replied with this 14 years ago, 7 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #306,939
@previous (Negi Springfield !aeNZeP7XP2)
Did you just compare homosexuality to vampirism and murder? Please just stop talking.
Did you just compare homosexuality to vampirism and murder? Please just stop talking.
Negi Springfield !aeNZeP7XP2 replied with this 14 years ago, 3 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #306,940
@previous (B)
They are both abnormal, so yes they are alike in my opinion.
Homosexuality is not a lifestyle, but a mental illness at the best and a human evil at the worst. You can say I'm wrong all you want, but it's not good for people to be gay. There is nothing good about homosexuality since it promotes a kind of behavoir that people should avoid. You shouldn't do something because you feel compelled to. No one who is "normal" or within the bounds of society likes eating human flesh. It's only in extraordinary circumstances that it happens. It's the same with homosexuality. Both are wrong. Deal with it.
OP tell me why you think you're gay. I want to see to what extent you've been brainwashed by the media and limp wristed whores that make up the clusterfuck society we live in. Do tell. You are mentally ill though, that much you recognize.
They are both abnormal, so yes they are alike in my opinion.
Homosexuality is not a lifestyle, but a mental illness at the best and a human evil at the worst. You can say I'm wrong all you want, but it's not good for people to be gay. There is nothing good about homosexuality since it promotes a kind of behavoir that people should avoid. You shouldn't do something because you feel compelled to. No one who is "normal" or within the bounds of society likes eating human flesh. It's only in extraordinary circumstances that it happens. It's the same with homosexuality. Both are wrong. Deal with it.
OP tell me why you think you're gay. I want to see to what extent you've been brainwashed by the media and limp wristed whores that make up the clusterfuck society we live in. Do tell. You are mentally ill though, that much you recognize.
(Edited 2 minutes later.)
Anonymous B replied with this 14 years ago, 15 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #306,941
@previous (Negi Springfield !aeNZeP7XP2)
You're absolutely fucking retarded. All you are doing is using blanket statements and saying "this is good and this is bad because I say it is" without any kind of evidence to support it whatsoever. You compare it to cannibalism... Are you fucking kidding me? People who resort to cannibalism in an "extraordinary circumstance" do it for survival purposes. There is no situation where homosexual attractions are necessary for the same purpose, so you're just making shit up now.
You're absolutely fucking retarded. All you are doing is using blanket statements and saying "this is good and this is bad because I say it is" without any kind of evidence to support it whatsoever. You compare it to cannibalism... Are you fucking kidding me? People who resort to cannibalism in an "extraordinary circumstance" do it for survival purposes. There is no situation where homosexual attractions are necessary for the same purpose, so you're just making shit up now.
Negi Springfield !aeNZeP7XP2 replied with this 14 years ago, 2 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #306,942
@previous (B)
You're white knighting for OP.
Homosexuality is just wrong and has less justification than cannibalism in a disaster. Think about that. Why encourage OP to be a faggot? Tell me that.
You're white knighting for OP.
Homosexuality is just wrong and has less justification than cannibalism in a disaster. Think about that. Why encourage OP to be a faggot? Tell me that.
Anonymous B replied with this 14 years ago, 1 minute later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #306,943
@previous (Negi Springfield !aeNZeP7XP2)
I'm done talking to you because you're a blithering idiot who can't defend your obviously bigoted moral codes.
I'm done talking to you because you're a blithering idiot who can't defend your obviously bigoted moral codes.
Negi Springfield !aeNZeP7XP2 replied with this 14 years ago, 4 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #306,944
@previous (B)
You call me a bigot for saying homosexuality is wrong.
I'm not surprised that homosexual behavior is being promoted and religious values are being treated as backwards. It's the nature of social backwardsness to allow for deviance like homosexuality and irreligiousity. You can say I'm a troll, but you are not much better. You are giving up, so please don't think you're morally superior in any way. Homosexuality kills people through sexually transmitted diseases and spiritually because of the Satanic nature of homosexuality. I want to know why you are so defensive of OP's homosexual choice. Is he your "boyfriend" or something? Lame.
You call me a bigot for saying homosexuality is wrong.
I'm not surprised that homosexual behavior is being promoted and religious values are being treated as backwards. It's the nature of social backwardsness to allow for deviance like homosexuality and irreligiousity. You can say I'm a troll, but you are not much better. You are giving up, so please don't think you're morally superior in any way. Homosexuality kills people through sexually transmitted diseases and spiritually because of the Satanic nature of homosexuality. I want to know why you are so defensive of OP's homosexual choice. Is he your "boyfriend" or something? Lame.
datbeefrave joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 7 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #306,946
lololol iseent this and had to say something so . SOMETHING.
Handel !khEOdtKF56 (OP) replied with this 14 years ago, 3 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #306,948
I only came out because my fucking moron of a mother was pestering me about it.
I find the whole "coming out" experience totally unnecessary and ridiculous.
I have to admit Negi that I do agree on some of your points, being gay is an evil, it just has been glorified by the media to the extent that is gay is cool.
I find the whole "coming out" experience totally unnecessary and ridiculous.
I have to admit Negi that I do agree on some of your points, being gay is an evil, it just has been glorified by the media to the extent that is gay is cool.
(Edited 4 minutes later.)
Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx replied with this 14 years ago, 8 seconds later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #306,949
Negi Springfield !aeNZeP7XP2 replied with this 14 years ago, 3 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #306,951
@previous (Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx)Ever since I decided I wanted to stop keeping my non-PC thoughts to myself.
I am a fundamentalist, but you can't say I'm wrong in what I'm saying. No religion on Earth permits homosexuality, so there is something to the fact that it is WRONG. Yes, there are absolutes and morality is not subjective.
@306,948 (Handel !khEOdtKF56)
You should have told her to leave you alone and asserted yourself.
Handel !khEOdtKF56 (OP) replied with this 14 years ago, 4 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #306,953
@previous (Negi Springfield !aeNZeP7XP2)
You don't realise how overbearing this woman is, and my immediate family is not making things much better for me.
You don't realise how overbearing this woman is, and my immediate family is not making things much better for me.
Negi Springfield !aeNZeP7XP2 replied with this 14 years ago, 4 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #306,954
@previous (Handel !khEOdtKF56)
She sounds like a sick woman who wants you to act out her fantasies.
Tell her you're offended that she would want you to be gay so badly.
She sounds like a sick woman who wants you to act out her fantasies.
Tell her you're offended that she would want you to be gay so badly.
postmortem !!Qe8ScDbX+ joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 19 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #307,111
I'm not sure why we glorify homosexuality, but still abhor other sexual orientations, and refer to them as deviant behaviors. It's all relative though, it's all just based on what society arbitrarily decides is okay at the moment. Honestly if homosexuality is accepted, then pedophilia, incest, and necrophilia should also be accepted.
Negi Springfield !aeNZeP7XP2 replied with this 14 years ago, 24 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #307,114
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 7 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #307,115
Wow, there are some stupid people in this thread.
Negi Springfield !aeNZeP7XP2 replied with this 14 years ago, 35 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #307,125
Anonymous I joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 21 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #307,130
Negi Springfield !aeNZeP7XP2 replied with this 14 years ago, 5 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #307,131
Stealth joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 1 hour later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #307,150
"Tomorrow I'm going to a gay therapist."
One would hope you go to the best therapist, irrespective of their sexual gender/orientation.
One would hope you go to the best therapist, irrespective of their sexual gender/orientation.
Anonymous K joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #307,151
@OP
You think that's bad? Try that plus being exclusively attracted to kids, then talk to me about your problems. Asshole.
You think that's bad? Try that plus being exclusively attracted to kids, then talk to me about your problems. Asshole.
Stealth replied with this 14 years ago, 12 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #307,155
Anonymous K replied with this 14 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #307,156
Stealth replied with this 14 years ago, 6 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #307,157
@previous (K)
I do not have a clue why you find that solution to much to handle. Millions of people every month find out they have cancer and then get major treatment, which often means cutting out the tumors.
I do not have a clue why you find that solution to much to handle. Millions of people every month find out they have cancer and then get major treatment, which often means cutting out the tumors.
Anonymous K replied with this 14 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #307,158
@previous (Stealth)
Not cutting off a mans bollocks just because he's attracted to children. Just because someone is attracted to kids doesn't mean their instinct is to go out and rape or hurt them, Jesus. If you really love kids you would never molest them or do something that will damage them mentally forever, real child lovers don't want to hurt kids.
Not cutting off a mans bollocks just because he's attracted to children. Just because someone is attracted to kids doesn't mean their instinct is to go out and rape or hurt them, Jesus. If you really love kids you would never molest them or do something that will damage them mentally forever, real child lovers don't want to hurt kids.
Stealth replied with this 14 years ago, 7 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #307,159
@previous (K)
Can you cite any research that says men attracted to kids will end up NOT molesting them? Seems so similar to cancer. You have it so one day its going to do what cancer does. At the very least one might think if there is a truly easy solution - One would go for it.
Can you cite any research that says men attracted to kids will end up NOT molesting them? Seems so similar to cancer. You have it so one day its going to do what cancer does. At the very least one might think if there is a truly easy solution - One would go for it.
Anonymous K replied with this 14 years ago, 50 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #307,161
@previous (Stealth)
Can you cite any research that says men attracted to kids will inevitably molest them? More heterosexual men commit rape and sexual assault than any other group, does that mean all straight men are potentially rapists?
Can you cite any research that says men attracted to kids will inevitably molest them? More heterosexual men commit rape and sexual assault than any other group, does that mean all straight men are potentially rapists?
Anonymous L joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 9 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #307,162
Broseph !!fxnDb+Ve4 joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 4 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #307,241
@307,159 (Stealth)
It seems that your anger causes you to form coherent sentences. Either that or in your anger you accidentally dropped the act, or forgot you left "Stealth" in the name field.
It seems that your anger causes you to form coherent sentences. Either that or in your anger you accidentally dropped the act, or forgot you left "Stealth" in the name field.
Anonymous N joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 1 hour later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #307,248
@307,158 (K)
Yeah, but you want to fuck them though, dont you?
Same difference, you deluded arsehole.
Yeah, but you want to fuck them though, dont you?
Same difference, you deluded arsehole.
Anonymous K replied with this 14 years ago, 4 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #307,272
@previous (N)
Provided they consented, wanted to have sex with me and initiated it, yes I would have passionate sex with them. I acknowledge this will probably never happen though and that's something I have to live with. Statutory rape where both parties consent is a lot different than some old man raping a little kid or making them do things.... That stuff causes a lot of psychological scars for the child later in life. Like I said true pedophiles love kids (hence the definition of the word "pedophile"), shoving your cock in an out of a 10-year-olds ass for 20 minutes while they're screaming is just not something you do to the kid if you actually love them. Yes I am a pedophile, but sex is just a small part of my sexuality.
Provided they consented, wanted to have sex with me and initiated it, yes I would have passionate sex with them. I acknowledge this will probably never happen though and that's something I have to live with. Statutory rape where both parties consent is a lot different than some old man raping a little kid or making them do things.... That stuff causes a lot of psychological scars for the child later in life. Like I said true pedophiles love kids (hence the definition of the word "pedophile"), shoving your cock in an out of a 10-year-olds ass for 20 minutes while they're screaming is just not something you do to the kid if you actually love them. Yes I am a pedophile, but sex is just a small part of my sexuality.
Anonymous N replied with this 14 years ago, 19 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #307,275
@previous (K)
Oh, just stop deluding yourself.
No child would even think about sex. Not without some kind of twisted intervention.
And you dont love kids. If you did you would be happy with them growing up innocent and unadulterated by people like you.
The fact is this: YOU HATE KIDS
Love doesnt even come into it. You see children and your first thought is how to defile and adulterate them with your actions.
You can witter on about "child love" all you like. You are deluding yourself. Your first thought is in sticking your dick into a small child. Dont pretend it is not.
You are a pedophile and can never be cured.
Oh, just stop deluding yourself.
No child would even think about sex. Not without some kind of twisted intervention.
And you dont love kids. If you did you would be happy with them growing up innocent and unadulterated by people like you.
The fact is this: YOU HATE KIDS
Love doesnt even come into it. You see children and your first thought is how to defile and adulterate them with your actions.
You can witter on about "child love" all you like. You are deluding yourself. Your first thought is in sticking your dick into a small child. Dont pretend it is not.
You are a pedophile and can never be cured.
Anonymous K replied with this 14 years ago, 8 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #307,276
@previous (N)
Christ. What the hell is wrong with you?
> No child would even think about sex. Not without some kind of twisted intervention.
I've met kids online that are different, but that's beside the point. You can't just say "no kids want to have sex", because it's patently untrue. Children can receive (and enjoy) sexual pleasure like it or not.
> If you did you would be happy with them growing up innocent and unadulterated by people like you.
I am perfectly fine with that.
> The fact is this: YOU HATE KIDS Love doesnt even come into it. You see children and your first thought is how to defile and adulterate them with your actions.
Absolutely not. Children are human beings not sexual objects. The last thing I think about when I see a cute child is having sex, damn I'm misunderstood.
Christ. What the hell is wrong with you?
> No child would even think about sex. Not without some kind of twisted intervention.
I've met kids online that are different, but that's beside the point. You can't just say "no kids want to have sex", because it's patently untrue. Children can receive (and enjoy) sexual pleasure like it or not.
> If you did you would be happy with them growing up innocent and unadulterated by people like you.
I am perfectly fine with that.
> The fact is this: YOU HATE KIDS Love doesnt even come into it. You see children and your first thought is how to defile and adulterate them with your actions.
Absolutely not. Children are human beings not sexual objects. The last thing I think about when I see a cute child is having sex, damn I'm misunderstood.
Unintentional Jackass !LASXURl1b6 joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 21 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #307,282
@306,940 (Negi Springfield !aeNZeP7XP2)
I don't understand your reasoning. We shouldn't do something even if we're compelled to? So, we shouldn't do what comes naturally?
Then, you should stop breathing immediately. It is not actually something you need to do to survive. In 1,000,000 years, when oxygen is of high premium, breathing will have a bad association with it. One shouldn't perform such acts in the same way one should not commit acts of violence and murder. You can't say I'm wrong in what I'm saying. No religion on Neptune permits breathing, so there is something to the fact that it is WRONG. Yes, there are absolutes and morality is not subjective. Stop wasting oxygen immediately, thanks.
I don't understand your reasoning. We shouldn't do something even if we're compelled to? So, we shouldn't do what comes naturally?
Then, you should stop breathing immediately. It is not actually something you need to do to survive. In 1,000,000 years, when oxygen is of high premium, breathing will have a bad association with it. One shouldn't perform such acts in the same way one should not commit acts of violence and murder. You can't say I'm wrong in what I'm saying. No religion on Neptune permits breathing, so there is something to the fact that it is WRONG. Yes, there are absolutes and morality is not subjective. Stop wasting oxygen immediately, thanks.
Anonymous I replied with this 14 years ago, 36 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #307,285
This needs bumping.
Anonymous N replied with this 14 years ago, 38 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #307,290
@307,276 (K)
You know I am right, though.
You cannot be trusted, therefore you should be sectioned away from proper society, for the benefit of everyone.
You know I am right, though.
You cannot be trusted, therefore you should be sectioned away from proper society, for the benefit of everyone.
Anonymous N double-posted this 14 years ago, 4 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #307,292
@307,276 (K)
@307,282 (Unintentional Jackass !LASXURl1b6)
> I don't understand your reasoning. We shouldn't do something even if we're compelled to? So, we shouldn't do what comes naturally?
>
> Then, you should stop breathing immediately. It is not actually something you need to do to survive. In 1,000,000 years, when oxygen is of high premium, breathing will have a bad association with it. One shouldn't perform such acts in the same way one should not commit acts of violence and murder. You can't say I'm wrong in what I'm saying. No religion on Neptune permits breathing, so there is something to the fact that it is WRONG. Yes, there are absolutes and morality is not subjective. Stop wasting oxygen immediately, thanks.
Also this.
You are such a fucking liar.
You are a fucking pedophile. You want to fuck little girls.
Dont pretend otherwise. Dont pretend you are a "child lover" or any such bollocks. Dont pretend your main concern is the safety of these kids.
You want to fuck kids, and you dont care how this happens.
@307,282 (Unintentional Jackass !LASXURl1b6)
> I don't understand your reasoning. We shouldn't do something even if we're compelled to? So, we shouldn't do what comes naturally?
>
> Then, you should stop breathing immediately. It is not actually something you need to do to survive. In 1,000,000 years, when oxygen is of high premium, breathing will have a bad association with it. One shouldn't perform such acts in the same way one should not commit acts of violence and murder. You can't say I'm wrong in what I'm saying. No religion on Neptune permits breathing, so there is something to the fact that it is WRONG. Yes, there are absolutes and morality is not subjective. Stop wasting oxygen immediately, thanks.
Also this.
You are such a fucking liar.
You are a fucking pedophile. You want to fuck little girls.
Dont pretend otherwise. Dont pretend you are a "child lover" or any such bollocks. Dont pretend your main concern is the safety of these kids.
You want to fuck kids, and you dont care how this happens.
Anonymous K replied with this 14 years ago, 12 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #307,294
@previous (N)
You know what? You don't even know me buddy, and you're straight up accusing me of wanting to fuck kids. What the fuck is wrong with you? Say that to my face and see what happens
You know what? You don't even know me buddy, and you're straight up accusing me of wanting to fuck kids. What the fuck is wrong with you? Say that to my face and see what happens
Stealth replied with this 14 years ago, 1 hour later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #307,316
@307,272 (K)
> Provided they consented, wanted to have sex with me and initiated it
That is why you are so delusional-- You believe a 3 year old or 5 or 7 or whatever age the child IS - Is old enough to consent.
That is the sickness all child molesters have. Brains so twisted and the result is a messed up child for the rest of their lives.
Again its just a cancer and the tumors have to be removed.
> Provided they consented, wanted to have sex with me and initiated it
That is why you are so delusional-- You believe a 3 year old or 5 or 7 or whatever age the child IS - Is old enough to consent.
That is the sickness all child molesters have. Brains so twisted and the result is a messed up child for the rest of their lives.
Again its just a cancer and the tumors have to be removed.
Stealth double-posted this 14 years ago, 4 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #307,317
@307,241 (Broseph !!fxnDb+Ve4)
> It seems that your anger causes you to form coherent sentences. Either that or in your anger you accidentally dropped the act, or forgot you left "Stealth" in the name field.
Nah if you mean the mess of text speak - I do so much of it for work as so many do - If you mean my true distaste of the English language because IR Engineer who works with Logic and Math and English is so illl-ogicality and constantly evolves - So Me thinks that if Shakespeare could event 1500 brand new words and mess with English n bcome famous for such then Y not I?
(Not that me thinks my fame of messing with English will surppasse Shakespeare - Face facts there are now more peeps messing with English in texting then all the writers in history added 2Getter
> It seems that your anger causes you to form coherent sentences. Either that or in your anger you accidentally dropped the act, or forgot you left "Stealth" in the name field.
Nah if you mean the mess of text speak - I do so much of it for work as so many do - If you mean my true distaste of the English language because IR Engineer who works with Logic and Math and English is so illl-ogicality and constantly evolves - So Me thinks that if Shakespeare could event 1500 brand new words and mess with English n bcome famous for such then Y not I?
(Not that me thinks my fame of messing with English will surppasse Shakespeare - Face facts there are now more peeps messing with English in texting then all the writers in history added 2Getter
kook !nH6RAuX8mo joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #307,318
@307,316 (Stealth)
What horrible thoughts might you have when you masturbate? No child is being harmed by this mans arousal.
What horrible thoughts might you have when you masturbate? No child is being harmed by this mans arousal.
squeegee !hbZVTk6JYc joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #307,320
ITT: people who aren't in relationships tell people in relationships how to have relationships.
Protip: no wonder you're not getting laid.
Protip: no wonder you're not getting laid.
squeegee !hbZVTk6JYc double-posted this 14 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #307,321
Stealth replied with this 14 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #307,323
@307,318 (kook !nH6RAuX8mo)
Why do you presume "horrible thoughts"? If you read the MANS text - HE WANTS to have sex with a Child - He clearly says so!!
> Provided they consented, wanted to have sex with me and initiated it, yes I would have passionate sex with them.
So a Child glances at the Anon - Anon takes that glance to mean consent - or he receives brain waves and reads the kids mind -
After all with Pedophiles one is dealing with a deranged mind. I bet you can find 1000's of Catholic Priests that will say they had permission from God when they messed with the kids. (At the very minimum they can prove they went to confessional and were forgiven for the sin)
Why do you presume "horrible thoughts"? If you read the MANS text - HE WANTS to have sex with a Child - He clearly says so!!
> Provided they consented, wanted to have sex with me and initiated it, yes I would have passionate sex with them.
So a Child glances at the Anon - Anon takes that glance to mean consent - or he receives brain waves and reads the kids mind -
After all with Pedophiles one is dealing with a deranged mind. I bet you can find 1000's of Catholic Priests that will say they had permission from God when they messed with the kids. (At the very minimum they can prove they went to confessional and were forgiven for the sin)
Stealth double-posted this 14 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #307,324
@307,321 (squeegee !hbZVTk6JYc)
Wot? Then again many have written books proving that Shakespeare did not write all that is attributed to him. I bet I have invented more then 1500 brand new words - That does put me ahead of Shakespeare eh
Wot? Then again many have written books proving that Shakespeare did not write all that is attributed to him. I bet I have invented more then 1500 brand new words - That does put me ahead of Shakespeare eh
squeegee !hbZVTk6JYc replied with this 14 years ago, 15 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #307,326
Stealth replied with this 14 years ago, 5 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #307,327
@previous (squeegee !hbZVTk6JYc)
"illiterate" as a Riter yes as a reader no
I do have Dyslexia which makes the illl-logical English language not so easy. The web is filled with critiques against the English language. Latin wood b so much more better eh
"illiterate" as a Riter yes as a reader no
I do have Dyslexia which makes the illl-logical English language not so easy. The web is filled with critiques against the English language. Latin wood b so much more better eh
Anonymous R joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 49 seconds later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #307,328
@307,161 (K)
> More heterosexual men commit rape and sexual assault than any other group, does that mean all straight men are potentially rapists?
> More heterosexual men commit rape and sexual assault than any other group, does that mean all straight men are potentially rapists?
QFT
kook !nH6RAuX8mo replied with this 14 years ago, 21 seconds later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #307,329
@307,323 (Stealth)
he said that he wants to, not that he will ever. There are many things that I would like to do, but never would given the opportunity.
he said that he wants to, not that he will ever. There are many things that I would like to do, but never would given the opportunity.
Stealth replied with this 14 years ago, 18 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #307,331
@previous (kook !nH6RAuX8mo)
So how would you feel if you knew your dad lusted after you and wanted to rape you? Creepy eh
Back a year ago when I spent tyme here and dealt with the same anon - and one who was willing to use a moniker - I hit the web trying to find any evidence that there are people out there that want to molest children, yet never went through with it.
I am not saying its impossible - Just that the odds are ultra high they will.
And please remember he already admits that:
> Provided they consented, wanted to have sex with me and initiated it, yes I would have passionate sex with them.
So all he needs is a 3 year old toddler and he is get2go
So how would you feel if you knew your dad lusted after you and wanted to rape you? Creepy eh
Back a year ago when I spent tyme here and dealt with the same anon - and one who was willing to use a moniker - I hit the web trying to find any evidence that there are people out there that want to molest children, yet never went through with it.
I am not saying its impossible - Just that the odds are ultra high they will.
And please remember he already admits that:
> Provided they consented, wanted to have sex with me and initiated it, yes I would have passionate sex with them.
So all he needs is a 3 year old toddler and he is get2go
Anonymous K replied with this 14 years ago, 5 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #307,332
@previous (Stealth)
> 3 year old toddler
You are the only one talking about toddlers here buddy, I never mentioned that. Babies and toddlers can't even verbalize so it's impossible for them to consent to sex.
> 3 year old toddler
You are the only one talking about toddlers here buddy, I never mentioned that. Babies and toddlers can't even verbalize so it's impossible for them to consent to sex.
Stealth replied with this 14 years ago, 11 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #307,333
@previous (K)
And a 5 or 6 or 10 year old child can?
Its just simple math you want to argue eh. YOU already know children are too young to give consent. You're not stupid just sick. You know that much. You even want a solution and I gave you the same one Millions of Cancer patients take every year. Just cut out the tumor and it will stop. Cancer patients are NOT that lucky as the tumors often come back.
And a 5 or 6 or 10 year old child can?
Its just simple math you want to argue eh. YOU already know children are too young to give consent. You're not stupid just sick. You know that much. You even want a solution and I gave you the same one Millions of Cancer patients take every year. Just cut out the tumor and it will stop. Cancer patients are NOT that lucky as the tumors often come back.
SQUARED :3 !L.....AlN. joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #307,334
Stealth replied with this 14 years ago, 9 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #307,335
The United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child defines a child as "a human being below the age of 18 years unless under the law applicable to the child, majority is attained earlier". Ratified by 192 of 194 member countries.
Web dictionaries "A young human being below the age of full physical development or below the legal age of majority."
So at the very minimum one might consider any human below the age of sexual maturity and sure it may get murky
Now consider that the Anon said
> I've met kids online that are different, but that's beside the point. You can't just say "no kids want to have sex", because it's patently untrue. Children can receive (and enjoy) sexual pleasure like it or not.
Kids Kids Kids - SQUARED :3 He has defined what excites him as "Kids" Not very murky eh
Web dictionaries "A young human being below the age of full physical development or below the legal age of majority."
So at the very minimum one might consider any human below the age of sexual maturity and sure it may get murky
Now consider that the Anon said
> I've met kids online that are different, but that's beside the point. You can't just say "no kids want to have sex", because it's patently untrue. Children can receive (and enjoy) sexual pleasure like it or not.
Kids Kids Kids - SQUARED :3 He has defined what excites him as "Kids" Not very murky eh
Anonymous K replied with this 14 years ago, 37 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #307,339
@307,333 (Stealth)
I think at age 8-17 they have their mind together enough to make decisions like that, definitely by 10 or 11. I'm not talking about coercion or rape either buddy, it's important you understand.
I think at age 8-17 they have their mind together enough to make decisions like that, definitely by 10 or 11. I'm not talking about coercion or rape either buddy, it's important you understand.
Anonymous K double-posted this 14 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #307,340
@307,335 (Stealth)
That is just absolute nonsense I mean are you saying someone age 17 years and 384 days is completely incapable of making a decision to consent to sex? I'm not convinced that those laws make sense every time. You seem to have preconceived ideas about me personally which I think is a bit stupid. Raping kids, doing stuff without regard for the welfare of the child, that's all bad. But there are exceptional circumstances.
That is just absolute nonsense I mean are you saying someone age 17 years and 384 days is completely incapable of making a decision to consent to sex? I'm not convinced that those laws make sense every time. You seem to have preconceived ideas about me personally which I think is a bit stupid. Raping kids, doing stuff without regard for the welfare of the child, that's all bad. But there are exceptional circumstances.
Stealth replied with this 14 years ago, 13 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #307,343
@previous (K)
> 8 years old >they have their mind together enough to make decisions like that, definitely by 10 or 11
So you peg it as 8 - 10 -11 What you really get excited about is a kid below the age of sexual maturity.
Anon K for you "it's important you understand"
Dude you make it really clear and yes I do understand and that is why you need them nuts inside your ballsack removed. You are a walking time bomb and you know it. Its just that you want someThing below jail bait and you grew up wired WRONG
I do understand I really do. And I know YOU understand that you are Sick to want the 8 year old toddler - er sorry at 8 they no longer crawl and can walk. So tell me why 7 is too young and 8 is old enough?
> 8 years old >they have their mind together enough to make decisions like that, definitely by 10 or 11
So you peg it as 8 - 10 -11 What you really get excited about is a kid below the age of sexual maturity.
Anon K for you "it's important you understand"
Dude you make it really clear and yes I do understand and that is why you need them nuts inside your ballsack removed. You are a walking time bomb and you know it. Its just that you want someThing below jail bait and you grew up wired WRONG
I do understand I really do. And I know YOU understand that you are Sick to want the 8 year old toddler - er sorry at 8 they no longer crawl and can walk. So tell me why 7 is too young and 8 is old enough?
Anonymous K replied with this 14 years ago, 7 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #307,345
@previous (Stealth)
You're a fucking idiot. Actual sexual intercourse is just a tiny fraction of my attraction to kids.
You're a fucking idiot. Actual sexual intercourse is just a tiny fraction of my attraction to kids.
Stealth replied with this 14 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #307,347
@previous (K)
I have no doubt your attraction is not limited to any single defined sex act with a kid.
I have no doubt your attraction is not limited to any single defined sex act with a kid.
Anonymous C replied with this 14 years ago, 14 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #307,350
dreamworks !k36EljOEVQ joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 24 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #307,351
squeegee !hbZVTk6JYc replied with this 14 years ago, 2 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #307,353
It should be illegal for anyone under the age of 18 to have sex with a pedophile.
Children don't understand that sex with pedophiles has consequences. Sure, every kid would love to have sex with a pedophile, but they also want ice cream for dinner! When it comes to sex with pedophiles children just can't control themselves, and that's why it's up to us to stop children from stalking, making contact, and emotionally manipulating pedophiles into having sex with them.
Children don't understand that sex with pedophiles has consequences. Sure, every kid would love to have sex with a pedophile, but they also want ice cream for dinner! When it comes to sex with pedophiles children just can't control themselves, and that's why it's up to us to stop children from stalking, making contact, and emotionally manipulating pedophiles into having sex with them.
Anonymous R replied with this 14 years ago, 2 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #307,354
Nega !34Kas0OdzM joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 3 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #307,355
This thread gave me cancer, a headache and the desire to kick things.Good job.
Stealth replied with this 14 years ago, 25 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #307,356
@previous (Nega !34Kas0OdzM)
Kicking is good for the soul. 4Me my work for a few hours is DONE! Surf is Lumpy, shifty, with broken up lines, yet there are a huge number of people kicking with it and its tyme for me to join them Again for a couple of hours.
@307,353 (squeegee !hbZVTk6JYc)
In the words of Ambrose Monk: You were being sardonic. Sarcasm is a contemptuous ironic statement. You were being mockingly derisive. That's sardonic.
Kicking is good for the soul. 4Me my work for a few hours is DONE! Surf is Lumpy, shifty, with broken up lines, yet there are a huge number of people kicking with it and its tyme for me to join them Again for a couple of hours.
@307,353 (squeegee !hbZVTk6JYc)
In the words of Ambrose Monk: You were being sardonic. Sarcasm is a contemptuous ironic statement. You were being mockingly derisive. That's sardonic.
Anonymous B replied with this 14 years ago, 10 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #307,360
Jesus fucking Christ this thread is out of control.
kook !nH6RAuX8mo replied with this 14 years ago, 1 hour later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #307,369
kook !nH6RAuX8mo double-posted this 14 years ago, 27 seconds later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #307,370
Anonymous C replied with this 14 years ago, 9 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #307,371
Anonymous N replied with this 14 years ago, 59 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #307,375
@307,334 (SQUARED :3 !L.....AlN.)
You have to be kidding me.
I normally dont agree with DEF, but I am with him on this issue. There is only one solution to the pedo issue, sadly.
You have to be kidding me.
I normally dont agree with DEF, but I am with him on this issue. There is only one solution to the pedo issue, sadly.
Stealth replied with this 14 years ago, 51 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #307,379
@307,370 (kook !nH6RAuX8mo)
Kook he said this :
> I've met kids online that are different, but that's beside the point. You can't just say "no kids want to have sex", because it's patently untrue. Children can receive (and enjoy) sexual pleasure like it or not.
HE Told You and Thee that in fact he wants an 8 year old kid and you can see he hangs with Kids on the net.
@previous (N)
Many here will not have a clue who DEF is LoL
Thank you 4 the Agree. I understand why a few will back the Pedo up here. After all Charles Manson and ALL Serial Killers develop a fan club with letters to prison and many end up getting married while in prison. Charles Manson still gets love letters yet he says he gets all the Sex he can handle in prison.
Kook he said this :
> I've met kids online that are different, but that's beside the point. You can't just say "no kids want to have sex", because it's patently untrue. Children can receive (and enjoy) sexual pleasure like it or not.
HE Told You and Thee that in fact he wants an 8 year old kid and you can see he hangs with Kids on the net.
@previous (N)
Many here will not have a clue who DEF is LoL
Thank you 4 the Agree. I understand why a few will back the Pedo up here. After all Charles Manson and ALL Serial Killers develop a fan club with letters to prison and many end up getting married while in prison. Charles Manson still gets love letters yet he says he gets all the Sex he can handle in prison.
kook !nH6RAuX8mo replied with this 14 years ago, 2 hours later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #307,421
@previous (Stealth)
you can't really accurately compare charles manson to some dude who talks about uncomfortable topics on the internet.
you can't really accurately compare charles manson to some dude who talks about uncomfortable topics on the internet.
Stealth replied with this 14 years ago, 46 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #307,438
@previous (kook !nH6RAuX8mo)
I was not comparing him to Charles Manson. My point in say your case is that you are backing the Pedo and its not unusual for people to take the side of a pedophile, or a serial killer. He fully admits to wanting sex with an 8 year old and it appears you have no problem with what he desires?
I was not comparing him to Charles Manson. My point in say your case is that you are backing the Pedo and its not unusual for people to take the side of a pedophile, or a serial killer. He fully admits to wanting sex with an 8 year old and it appears you have no problem with what he desires?
kook !nH6RAuX8mo replied with this 14 years ago, 11 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #307,448
@previous (Stealth)
I can't really have a problem with desires. thoughts cant be controlled. I try and focus on actions.
I can't really have a problem with desires. thoughts cant be controlled. I try and focus on actions.
Anonymous V joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 2 hours later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #307,472
No sexuality is wrong. They just are. To claim it is wrong is to claim another is right.
Guess what? Right and wrong are human constructs. Everything is. To try to qualify something that is as having attributes that are right or wrong is silly. It is. Its always been. It always will be.
Different is not wrong. Stop being such fucking tools.
Guess what? Right and wrong are human constructs. Everything is. To try to qualify something that is as having attributes that are right or wrong is silly. It is. Its always been. It always will be.
Different is not wrong. Stop being such fucking tools.
Dead !Pool7hVoC2 joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 3 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #307,473
@OP
How was your appointment yesterday?
How was your appointment yesterday?
Anonymous X joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 1 hour later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #307,484
cool op
that's great
@306,940 (Negi Springfield !aeNZeP7XP2)
dude you are a disgusting nerd
can you be a disgusting nerd and have a normal happy life? no
can you be gay and have a normal happy life? yes
that's great
@306,940 (Negi Springfield !aeNZeP7XP2)
dude you are a disgusting nerd
can you be a disgusting nerd and have a normal happy life? no
can you be gay and have a normal happy life? yes
Anonymous X double-posted this 14 years ago, 4 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #307,485
@306,944 (Negi Springfield !aeNZeP7XP2)
> It's the nature of social backwardsness to allow for deviance like homosexuality and irreligiousity.
lol
'backwardsness'
'irreligiousity'
it's funny because you are implying that being gay is a societal construct and that religion is not and that morals are even real
> It's the nature of social backwardsness to allow for deviance like homosexuality and irreligiousity.
lol
'backwardsness'
'irreligiousity'
it's funny because you are implying that being gay is a societal construct and that religion is not and that morals are even real
Unintentional Jackass !LASXURl1b6 replied with this 14 years ago, 2 hours later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #307,492
This thread, man. Brilliant.