kook !nH6RAuX8mo joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 1 minute later[^][v]#305,325
that's how all mothers used to introduce their children to solid foods. why she does it this way, when we now have electricity and food processors is a mystery.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 14 years ago, 2 minutes later, 4 minutes after the original post[^][v]#305,327
@previous (kook !nH6RAuX8mo)
Maybe it's part of a more "natural" behaviour trend that some people want to return to. Hollywood actors/actresses always have odd lifestyle choices though so it's not really too surprising.
Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 2 minutes later, 6 minutes after the original post[^][v]#305,332
She's an actress, not a brain surgeon.
She's obviously fucking retarded. It's a shame she was capable of reproducing. Wish her womb had died with her career.
kook !nH6RAuX8mo replied with this 14 years ago, 2 minutes later, 9 minutes after the original post[^][v]#305,336
@305,327 (A)
that could be it. Rich people have the time and the social acceptance to act crazy like this. If I were ever win the lottery, it would probably not improve my character.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 14 years ago, 3 seconds later, 9 minutes after the original post[^][v]#305,337
@305,332 (C)
That's a rather extreme reaction to this thread, but all right.
Anonymous C replied with this 14 years ago, 6 minutes later, 15 minutes after the original post[^][v]#305,352
@previous (A)
Her first decision as a parent, naming her kid, she fucked up royally. I don't think bein capable of getting pregnant or getting someone pregnant is a suitable standard for having children.
This just cements my opinion that reproduction should take place only when I approve (which would be exceptionally rare).
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 14 years ago, 1 minute later, 16 minutes after the original post[^][v]#305,356
@previous (C)
That's pretty much the norm with Hollywood entertainers though. Don't ask me why but it seems to be that way. It's not much worse than the people who name their children ridiculous stuff or feed them ridiculous things that you never ever hear about unless it's so bad it makes the local news.
Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 8 hours later, 8 hours after the original post[^][v]#305,463
With that name, he's destined to be a homosexual BDSM slave anyhow. How she feeds him is trivial.
HaikerensGuide !0VegJ9Jl.Q joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 19 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^][v]#305,681
But still, I can almost agree with you. Over here chavs name their kids after their favourite drinks.
(Edited 29 seconds later.)
Anonymous G joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 3 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^][v]#305,726
Is that Bear Blu or Bear Blu Silverstone?
Anonymous E replied with this 14 years ago, 7 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^][v]#305,819
@305,696 (Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx) > being forced to have a ridiculous name throughout childhood > freedom
Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx replied with this 14 years ago, 1 hour later, 1 day after the original post[^][v]#305,858
@previous (E)
A person can change their name if it bothers them that much.
I don't see how being saddled with a crappy name is exactly taking somebody's freedom away, nowhere near as much as making name laws anyway. Parents naming their kids is a cultural, worldwide thing while making laws about it is just the government.
Anonymous E replied with this 14 years ago, 27 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^][v]#305,870
@previous (Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx)
WHen the kid is 18, they should be able to change it to whatever they want. It's like the issue of circumcision and consent.
Lee O'Nidas !nBpim1wazU joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 1 day later, 2 days after the original post[^][v]#306,190
I wonder how fucked up the kid will be when he grows up. He'll probably end up in Scientology at the very least.