Topic: What would a Web 3.0 version of Minichan be like?
Anonymous A started this discussion 14 years ago #18,188
Apart from full of drama and shit posts.
Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 1 minute later[^] [v] #303,284
javascript and ruby on rails
Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 14 seconds later, 2 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #303,285
3DFake anon !ZkUt8arUCU joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 4 minutes later, 6 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #303,291
Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 37 seconds later, 7 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #303,294
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 14 years ago, 15 seconds later, 7 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #303,295
Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx replied with this 14 years ago, 1 minute later, 8 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #303,298
@303,291 (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
It will be glorious!
We might as well make every image 3D. No sense in living in the past.
It will be glorious!
We might as well make every image 3D. No sense in living in the past.
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 14 years ago, 3 minutes later, 12 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #303,305
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 14 years ago, 2 minutes later, 14 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #303,310
Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 53 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #303,348
Downloadable app that only runs on Macs
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 14 years ago, 38 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #303,349
$.jpg !YGrsehnh6M joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 5 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #303,351
Ruby and AJAX, only usable by people running the absolute last build of Chromium, built directly from source.
squeegee !firstkPE1Q joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 4 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #303,357
@303,348 (F)
why is it not an app?
My idea is for this board to be an app.
inb4 illegal clone of my idea.
edit: i will offer my idea to be used free of charge as long as there is folder called squeegeelib
and i am named in the code as co-author.
why is it not an app?
My idea is for this board to be an app.
inb4 illegal clone of my idea.
edit: i will offer my idea to be used free of charge as long as there is folder called squeegeelib
and i am named in the code as co-author.
(Edited 2 minutes later.)
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 14 years ago, 8 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #303,362
@previous (squeegee !firstkPE1Q)
Can I be the first poster of each thread?
Can I be the first poster of each thread?
(Edited 21 seconds later.)
squeegee !firstkPE1Q replied with this 14 years ago, 9 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #303,367
@previous (A)
seriously though, it could be an app. am i wrong? an image board app? A BBS app?
Someone write kimmo and tell him you've made an anontalk-clone app called AnonChat (which sounds cooler and more marketable) be sure to tell him that
edit: and tell him you'll give it to him but you want credit for it
seriously though, it could be an app. am i wrong? an image board app? A BBS app?
Someone write kimmo and tell him you've made an anontalk-clone app called AnonChat (which sounds cooler and more marketable) be sure to tell him that
edit: and tell him you'll give it to him but you want credit for it
(Edited 1 minute later.)
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 14 years ago, 8 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #303,370
@previous (squeegee !firstkPE1Q)
It could be if everybody has unlimited data on their phones too. Cuz it will all have to be in real time, it's the Web 3.0. You will see new replies appear while you're still typing yours. We've actually done some test with this and it works!
It could be if everybody has unlimited data on their phones too. Cuz it will all have to be in real time, it's the Web 3.0. You will see new replies appear while you're still typing yours. We've actually done some test with this and it works!
squeegee !firstkPE1Q replied with this 14 years ago, 29 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #303,388
@previous (A)
only time i'm not on wifi is when i'm driving, basically. hotspots galore. realtime would be the next logical step i would think. That'd be pretty awesome.
only time i'm not on wifi is when i'm driving, basically. hotspots galore. realtime would be the next logical step i would think. That'd be pretty awesome.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 14 years ago, 5 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #303,389
@previous (squeegee !firstkPE1Q)
It is easily done for desktops now, just mobiles will be tricky when it comes to data bundles for most of us who don't have constant wifi or unlimited interwebs.
It is easily done for desktops now, just mobiles will be tricky when it comes to data bundles for most of us who don't have constant wifi or unlimited interwebs.