Topic: New iPads burn holes in pockets and laps!

Anonymous A started this discussion 14 years ago #18,161

Thats 46C.

http://news.consumerreports.org/electronics/2012/03/our-test-finds-new-ipad-hits-116-degrees-while-running-games.html

Meta !PARAdoxiHw joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 17 hours later[^] [v] #303,434

The iPad 3 is hot even at idle :/

Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 2 minutes later, 17 hours after the original post[^] [v] #303,436

It's the hottest product on the markeoh forget it

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 14 years ago, 11 minutes later, 17 hours after the original post[^] [v] #303,438

@previous (C)
lol'd anyways

Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 30 minutes later, 17 hours after the original post[^] [v] #303,444

116? That's more than enough to boil water.
Jesus fuck...

Fox !FXYGNx1XR. joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 5 minutes later, 17 hours after the original post[^] [v] #303,446

@previous (D)
It would be, were it Celsius.
As it is, it just boils up a bunch of minor inconvenience.

Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 37 minutes later, 18 hours after the original post[^] [v] #303,453

macs: they just work in winter

(Edited 27 seconds later.)

green !YzDEWwv9Z2 joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 3 hours later, 21 hours after the original post[^] [v] #303,482

@303,444 (D)
It's in the barbaric farenheit measurement.

Anonymous D replied with this 14 years ago, 3 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #303,523

@303,446 (Fox !FXYGNx1XR.)
@previous (green !YzDEWwv9Z2)
so this is just sensationalism?

Anonymous H joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 4 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #303,561

@303,482 (green !YzDEWwv9Z2)
Farenheit is superior for this applicaion. Fucking monotheistic headcases.

dreamworks !k36EljOEVQ joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 2 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #303,613

@previous (H)
whys that

Anonymous J joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 1 hour later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #303,633

@previous (dreamworks !k36EljOEVQ)
because fahrenheit is obviously much more specific than celsius in terms of whole numbers.

green !YzDEWwv9Z2 replied with this 14 years ago, 28 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #303,647

@previous (J)
What. Celsius makes more sense. 0 the freezing point of water 100 the boiling point.

Anonymous J replied with this 14 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #303,651

@previous (green !YzDEWwv9Z2)
thanks green but real scientists are talking here. go back to tear-drenched tesco cider bottles

dreamworks !k36EljOEVQ replied with this 14 years ago, 13 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #303,661

@previous (J)

> real scientists
> dreamworks
> anonymous j

Anonymous J replied with this 14 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #303,664

@previous (dreamworks !k36EljOEVQ)
> implying one of us isnt a real scientist

dreamworks !k36EljOEVQ replied with this 14 years ago, 10 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #303,674

@previous (J)
> implying one of us

Anonymous J replied with this 14 years ago, 7 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #303,683

@previous (dreamworks !k36EljOEVQ)
gooble gobble gooble gobble

Anonymous H replied with this 14 years ago, 2 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #303,806

@303,613 (dreamworks !k36EljOEVQ)
see: @303,633 (J)

Each degree Celcius represents a bigger change in temperature than each degree Farenheit does. Moreover, when comparison with body temperature is desired Farenheit proves to be more simple as 100 degrees is right around the threshold where cellular damage begins to occur.

Minichan