SQUARED :3 !L.....AlN. joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 10 minutes later[^][v]#32,657
we need to donate them some weapons :D
Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 1 hour later, 1 hour after the original post[^][v]#32,725
aavaz isn't trusted
they are hippy pieces of shit who refuse to stop emailing me
;_;
psychopath !PAHVpsycho joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^][v]#32,730
The US govt. needs to fund the protesters with arms, sheltre, and other supplies.
Ph !5pM9NZR/l6 joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^][v]#32,734
@previous (psychopath !PAHVpsycho)
But directly interfering like that when we are already involved in two wars is a bad move.
Anonymous C replied with this 15 years ago, 35 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^][v]#32,736
@32,730 (psychopath !PAHVpsycho)
Why don't we just murder the ruling class and save money?
psychopath !PAHVpsycho replied with this 15 years ago, 18 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^][v]#32,737
@32,734 (Ph !5pM9NZR/l6)
If our investment proves successful, we will have much diplomatic relations with new governing powers.
psychopath !PAHVpsycho double-posted this 15 years ago, 27 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^][v]#32,738
@32,736 (C)
We have to let them do it on their own.
Ph !5pM9NZR/l6 replied with this 15 years ago, 38 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^][v]#32,740
@32,737 (psychopath !PAHVpsycho)
I guess it would be a step towards keeping radical islamic groups from taking over, though I'm still not convinced it would be wise for us to step in. It could easily be seen as America being world police yet again.
psychopath !PAHVpsycho replied with this 15 years ago, 55 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^][v]#32,743
@previous (Ph !5pM9NZR/l6)
Nope. We won't be involved in any fighting. We give them weapons and sheltre and nothing more. We will be viewed as heroes.
Ph !5pM9NZR/l6 replied with this 15 years ago, 55 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^][v]#32,744
@previous (psychopath !PAHVpsycho)
If they accept it I suppose. Though to me it sounds like we would be setting ourselves up for the creation of another Taliban.
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 32 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^][v]#32,745
@32,743 (psychopath !PAHVpsycho)
Except we tried that strategy before with a man named Osama bin-Laden, and it didn't end well. I'd rather not do that again.
Anonymous G joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 14 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^][v]#32,759
> Except we tried that strategy before with a man named Osama bin-Laden, and it didn't end well
It didn't end well because the US abandoned Afganistan after the soviets pulled out, even after they promised otherwise. Bin Laden felt betrayed and used as simply a pawn in a proxy war.
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 15 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^][v]#32,764
@previous (G)
Yes. But that lesson teaches us that arming rebels can be a very risky business, and isn't something that should be done whenever the circumstance arises.
Anonymous G replied with this 15 years ago, 51 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^][v]#32,765
Also I want to donate to Gadaffi. What do?
psychopath !PAHVpsycho replied with this 15 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^][v]#32,774
@32,744 (Ph !5pM9NZR/l6)
But this might make them like us. @32,745 (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
Osama was a fucked up dude.