Topic: Why hasn't Hollywood remade the original Terminator movie yet?
Anonymous A started this discussion 14 years ago #17,445
It just seems like something they'd do.
Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 13 minutes later[^] [v] #294,794
Shhhhh! Don't give them ideas.
Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 1 minute later, 14 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #294,796
Anonymous B replied with this 14 years ago, 8 minutes later, 23 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #294,801
@previous (C)
What, you haven't seen Ridley Scott's new screenplay about autistic shut-ins who play Minecraft and post furry porn??
What, you haven't seen Ridley Scott's new screenplay about autistic shut-ins who play Minecraft and post furry porn??
Fats !lbanned8o6 joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 1 hour later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #294,817
Only movies that were shitty the first time should be remade. There is nothing wrong with Terminator at all. If anyone touches it I hope a shit is immediately fucked up their collective asses.
Broseph !!fxnDb+Ve4 joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 1 hour later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #294,826
@previous (Fats !lbanned8o6)
One thing I never understood about those movies: Why wouldn't the machines send the Terminator from Terminator III back in time to kill Sarah Conner instead of sending the one Arnold played? I mean, they have a fucking time machine? Why not just keep sending robots to the same point in time over and over to kill her? I know they wouldn't have a movie if they did that, but at least set up some sort of plot device that explains why they can't do that.
One thing I never understood about those movies: Why wouldn't the machines send the Terminator from Terminator III back in time to kill Sarah Conner instead of sending the one Arnold played? I mean, they have a fucking time machine? Why not just keep sending robots to the same point in time over and over to kill her? I know they wouldn't have a movie if they did that, but at least set up some sort of plot device that explains why they can't do that.
Fats !lbanned8o6 replied with this 14 years ago, 6 hours later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #294,902
@previous (Broseph !!fxnDb+Ve4)
The problem with any time travel movie is that logic always get in the way. Think of Back To the Future. Why would Doc Brown take the chance of letting the Libyans shoot him two dozen times? Sure, he had on a flac jacket, but what if one bullet hit his neck, face, or cock? I always wondered why he didn't just have Marty meet him across town or a day earlier.
The problem with any time travel movie is that logic always get in the way. Think of Back To the Future. Why would Doc Brown take the chance of letting the Libyans shoot him two dozen times? Sure, he had on a flac jacket, but what if one bullet hit his neck, face, or cock? I always wondered why he didn't just have Marty meet him across town or a day earlier.
(Edited 54 seconds later.)
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 14 years ago, 6 hours later, 15 hours after the original post[^] [v] #294,942
@294,826 (Broseph !!fxnDb+Ve4)
Terminator rules: One way back, never forward.
Back to the Future rules: Go wherever the fuck you want and do whatever the fuck you want.
Terminator rules: One way back, never forward.
Back to the Future rules: Go wherever the fuck you want and do whatever the fuck you want.
(Edited 1 minute later.)
mountainman !4EB6xd.Oos joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 20 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #295,217
Terminator was a weird movie, it only got pop with the 2nd one. I think Arnold = Terminator thoughAnonymous G joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 11 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #295,358
They're were too busy ruining Star Wars, but it's on the agenda.
Anonymous H joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #295,359
Watch the Sarah Conner Chronicles.
Dead !Pool7hVoC2 joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #295,361
Because there's no way to replace the govenator successfully