Topic: What would you do if gay marriage was legalized in all 50 states?
Anonymous A started this discussion 14 years ago #17,318
I'd say good for them.
vocalon !WHySpXg2po joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 1 hour later[^] [v] #292,788
I would continue to give no fucks.
Aileron !LUFRSd346Y joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 16 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #292,789
Leave the country.
Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 47 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #292,790
Aileron !LUFRSd346Y replied with this 14 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #292,794
Why can't people just leave marriage alone?
vocalon !WHySpXg2po replied with this 14 years ago, 15 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #292,795
Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 7 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #292,800
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 14 years ago, 1 hour later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #292,831
Broseph !!fxnDb+Ve4 joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 33 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #292,844
@292,788 (vocalon !WHySpXg2po)
This. I'd just go about my business as usual since it doesn't affect me at all. The sooner the assholes opposing it realize this, the better.
This. I'd just go about my business as usual since it doesn't affect me at all. The sooner the assholes opposing it realize this, the better.
Anonymous G joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 2 hours later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #292,867
@previous (Broseph !!fxnDb+Ve4)
> This. I'd just go about my business as usual since it doesn't affect me at all. The sooner the assholes opposing it realize this, the better.
> This. I'd just go about my business as usual since it doesn't affect me at all. The sooner the assholes opposing it realize this, the better.
mountainman !4EB6xd.Oos joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 1 hour later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #292,874
Legalized isn't quite the right term. It leads people to believe that currently it is illegal, which is largely synonymous with criminal. It is merely that homosexual marriage is not recognized by the state.
Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 58 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #292,881
TheSheep !kJ.A4PF7.k joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 1 hour later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #292,888
Drink sprite out of the bottle.
Anonymous K joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 1 hour later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #292,919
48 states. Alaska and Hawaii don't fucking count retard. They're unserious fraud states.
(Edited 52 seconds later.)
dw !AIy/L67q.s joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 5 hours later, 16 hours after the original post[^] [v] #292,974
idc
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 1 hour later, 17 hours after the original post[^] [v] #292,986
I would join the roving gang of married homosexuals who run around actively seeking out and destroying heterosexual marriages.
Anonymous K replied with this 14 years ago, 1 hour later, 19 hours after the original post[^] [v] #293,004
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 14 years ago, 49 minutes later, 20 hours after the original post[^] [v] #293,020
@previous (K)
Americans think that gay marriage is a direct threat to heterosexual marriage. If that is the case, then there must be gangs of married homosexuals who run around maliciously disrupting happy heterosexual couples. I want to join them in their quest for the utter dismemberment of the tradition of marriage.
Americans think that gay marriage is a direct threat to heterosexual marriage. If that is the case, then there must be gangs of married homosexuals who run around maliciously disrupting happy heterosexual couples. I want to join them in their quest for the utter dismemberment of the tradition of marriage.
(Edited 39 seconds later.)
Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx replied with this 14 years ago, 43 minutes later, 21 hours after the original post[^] [v] #293,046
@previous (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
This. Gay marriage would have very real and very serious consequences other that just annoying people who hate change. Obviously.
This. Gay marriage would have very real and very serious consequences other that just annoying people who hate change. Obviously.
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 14 years ago, 5 minutes later, 21 hours after the original post[^] [v] #293,049
@previous (Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx)
I can confirm this with a 100% true and not fake anectdote that totally happened. My best friend was happily married to someone of the opposite gender, and then gay marriage was legalized. Now he is married to eleven different men, 3 cats, a wildebeest and a 14" black dildo.
Gay marriage: not even once.
I can confirm this with a 100% true and not fake anectdote that totally happened. My best friend was happily married to someone of the opposite gender, and then gay marriage was legalized. Now he is married to eleven different men, 3 cats, a wildebeest and a 14" black dildo.
Gay marriage: not even once.
Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx replied with this 14 years ago, 5 minutes later, 21 hours after the original post[^] [v] #293,053
@previous (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
You're right, it's a slippery slope. If they legalise that, then who knows where it will stop? Before you know it they'll just allow anyone to marry anything and society itself will collapse.
Gay marriage is also letting the terrorists win.
You're right, it's a slippery slope. If they legalise that, then who knows where it will stop? Before you know it they'll just allow anyone to marry anything and society itself will collapse.
Gay marriage is also letting the terrorists win.
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 14 years ago, 2 minutes later, 21 hours after the original post[^] [v] #293,054
mountainman !4EB6xd.Oos replied with this 14 years ago, 1 minute later, 21 hours after the original post[^] [v] #293,055
@293,020 (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
An actual argument used is that the line must be drawn somewhere - if we recognize homosexual marriage, society's view of marriage will be so fundamentally changed that it will not be long before bestiality and pedophilia is recognized.
This argument assumes you are opposed to the latter lol
An actual argument used is that the line must be drawn somewhere - if we recognize homosexual marriage, society's view of marriage will be so fundamentally changed that it will not be long before bestiality and pedophilia is recognized.
This argument assumes you are opposed to the latter lol
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 14 years ago, 4 minutes later, 21 hours after the original post[^] [v] #293,059
@previous (mountainman !4EB6xd.Oos)
Well yes, the line must be drawn somewhere (non-arbitrarily). Proponents of homosexual marriage would probably say something along the lines of "Marriage is a contract agreed upon by two consenting adults." I don't think many people would disagree with that definition. People opposed to gay marriage want to qualify that sentence by adding in "of the opposite gender", but that to me seems at best arbitrary, and at worst, bigotry.
Well yes, the line must be drawn somewhere (non-arbitrarily). Proponents of homosexual marriage would probably say something along the lines of "Marriage is a contract agreed upon by two consenting adults." I don't think many people would disagree with that definition. People opposed to gay marriage want to qualify that sentence by adding in "of the opposite gender", but that to me seems at best arbitrary, and at worst, bigotry.
Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx replied with this 14 years ago, 2 minutes later, 21 hours after the original post[^] [v] #293,061
@293,054 (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
Yee-haw!
@293,055 (mountainman !4EB6xd.Oos)
You're right. Once we allow all of those homosexuals to marry, pedophiles will suddenly be accepted by the government and be allowed to marry.
Thank you for you wisdom, mountainman.
Yee-haw!
@293,055 (mountainman !4EB6xd.Oos)
You're right. Once we allow all of those homosexuals to marry, pedophiles will suddenly be accepted by the government and be allowed to marry.
Thank you for you wisdom, mountainman.
mountainman !4EB6xd.Oos replied with this 14 years ago, 1 hour later, 23 hours after the original post[^] [v] #293,090
@293,059 (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)This. Marriage has nothing to do with raising children, which is another common objection. Marriage is a legal state where two individuals become legally recognized as one person i.e. joint ownership of property. I don't know if that's how it works anymore, but I like that definition.
@previous (Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx)
see pic