Notice: You have been identified as a bot, so no internal UID will be assigned to you. If you are a real person messing with your useragent, you should change it back to something normal.
Topic: So, I posted clean furry art in one of my music forums as an experiment.
Falco !PZmcClOUDk started this discussion 14 years ago#17,263
And I included a poll to gauge how people feel about it. These are people who generally have no idea what furry even is.
I posted the picture I just posted here in the OP. It's something I like, and it's something I can epitomize as something very close to what I consider "ideal beauty" since I am eternally plagued with furfaggotry. There's nothing perverted about it, and it's well drawn.
This is what some people had to say:
"I wanna take you home
I won't do you no harm, no
You've got to be all mine, all mine
Ooh, foxy lady"
"Quickly changing the tab because at high speed analysis I thought it would be porn.
Shortly followed by bewilderment at the existence of this thread."
"You forgot WTF?"
"Me: In your case, the "Disgust" option would probably fit the bill the best."
"No, I don't find the picture disgusting. I'm not a deviant or a small child (contrary to popular opinion), so I'm not excited by it in any way, and having seen plenty of cartoons in my time, I'm neither surprised nor bewildered by a slightly ropey drawing of a fox in a dress.
I am a little confused as to why someone would start this thread, though perhaps I don't want to find out."
It's interesting to get a different point of view on this kinda thing.
New post:
"Frankly I would have no problems with furries, if they, like all other sane people kept their bizarre fetishes to themselves and stopped treating it like some sort of religious experience."
Fox !FXYGNx1XR. replied with this 14 years ago, 56 seconds later, 55 minutes after the original post[^][v]#292,044