Topic: Sex with children: Can it be justified strictly for medical purposes?
Anonymous A started this discussion 15 years ago #16,131
If a life is at risk, can sex with children be justified, strictly for medical purposes?
Nega !34Kas0OdzM joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 2 minutes later[^] [v] #278,607
I don't know.
When reading your headline, can drinking Sprite be acceptable if it's for purely medical purposes? ;-j
When reading your headline, can drinking Sprite be acceptable if it's for purely medical purposes? ;-j
Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 35 seconds later, 2 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #278,608
No, because there's no medic condition that requires a person to have sex with a child.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 3 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #278,609
Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx replied with this 15 years ago, 2 minutes later, 6 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #278,610
Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 4 minutes later, 11 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #278,612
0/10
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 5 minutes later, 16 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #278,616
@278,610 (Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx)
Or perhaps a young boy develops a tumor in his bowl and the only way for it to be abated is by getting washed with semen - I don't know, that's not relevant. I am just posing the question, could it be morally justified if it saved a life? The child could be rendered unconscious if necessary.
Or perhaps a young boy develops a tumor in his bowl and the only way for it to be abated is by getting washed with semen - I don't know, that's not relevant. I am just posing the question, could it be morally justified if it saved a life? The child could be rendered unconscious if necessary.
TheSheep !kJ.A4PF7.k joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 3 minutes later, 19 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #278,617
@previous (A)
> Or perhaps a young boy develops a tumor in his bowl and the only way for it to be abated is by getting washed with semen
Crazy idea, you just wash it with semen then instead of fucking the boy...
OP is as always, a faggot.
> Or perhaps a young boy develops a tumor in his bowl and the only way for it to be abated is by getting washed with semen
Crazy idea, you just wash it with semen then instead of fucking the boy...
OP is as always, a faggot.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 2 minutes later, 22 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #278,621
@previous (TheSheep !kJ.A4PF7.k)
But the chemical makeup of the tumor requires that it is fresh semen ejaculated directly from a man deep into the child's ass.
But the chemical makeup of the tumor requires that it is fresh semen ejaculated directly from a man deep into the child's ass.
Nega !34Kas0OdzM replied with this 15 years ago, 6 minutes later, 28 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #278,631
@278,617 (TheSheep !kJ.A4PF7.k)
> >Or perhaps a young boy develops a tumor in his bowl and the only way for it to be abated is by getting washed with semen
>
>
> OP is - as always - a faggot.
Fixed.
Inb4 AC comes in and starts talking about bored English majors.
> >Or perhaps a young boy develops a tumor in his bowl and the only way for it to be abated is by getting washed with semen
>
>
> OP is - as always - a faggot.
Fixed.
Inb4 AC comes in and starts talking about bored English majors.
Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 30 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #278,636
Nega !34Kas0OdzM replied with this 15 years ago, 2 minutes later, 32 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #278,641
TheSheep !kJ.A4PF7.k replied with this 15 years ago, 12 minutes later, 44 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #278,656
@278,631 (Nega !34Kas0OdzM)
> AC bashes on my writing style
> read his post while drinking Sprite
> and not a single fuck was given that day
> AC bashes on my writing style
> read his post while drinking Sprite
> and not a single fuck was given that day
Falco !PZmcClOUDk joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 5 minutes later, 49 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #278,660
preschool tier trollingAnonymous A (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 34 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #278,699
@previous (Falco !PZmcClOUDk)
This is not trolling, this is a serious thought provoking discussion about a subject close to my heart.
This is not trolling, this is a serious thought provoking discussion about a subject close to my heart.
Kakubunretsu !!7Enb4sycc joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #278,703
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #278,705
Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #278,708
Falco !PZmcClOUDk replied with this 15 years ago, 53 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #278,709
@278,699 (A)> This is not trolling, this is a serious thought provoking discussion about a subject close to my heart.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 4 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #278,711
Fuck it, you guys are so immature. I'm re-posting this at GHOUL.
Falco !PZmcClOUDk replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #278,712
!MNVn34z6vo joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 19 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #278,723
didnt post
(Edited 50 seconds later.)
!MNVn34z6vo double-posted this 15 years ago, 41 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #278,724
Anonymous J joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 48 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #278,725
LEGALISE CHILD ABUSE FOR MEDICAL AND RECREATIONAL PURPOSES.
!EFNQ4mGC8k replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #278,727
test
Anonymous J replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #278,729
!4DKyCbuMvU replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #278,730
test
Anonymous J replied with this 15 years ago, 25 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #278,732
!DASHqGnDdc replied with this 15 years ago, 16 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #278,733
inb4 this one does not work
inb4 it actually does work after all
inb4 it actually does work after all
Rainbow !DASHqGnDdc double-posted this 15 years ago, 19 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #278,736
Yusss
Anonymous J replied with this 15 years ago, 51 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #278,737
Rainbow !DASHqGnDdc replied with this 15 years ago, 44 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #278,739
Anonymous K joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 2 days later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #280,037
Yes.
Anonymous L joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 36 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #280,047
Anonymous M joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 3 hours later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #280,077
@OP
Did you know there are some rare cases* where it is necessary for adults to have sex with children? Some hospitals have begun hiring adults specifically for this purpose. The problem is that most adults do not find children sexually attractive. The only way to rectify this problem is to legalize medical child porn in order to increase the sexual appeal of children.
*See: The supporting documents of Lentz GM (2007). Anatomic defects of the abdominal wall and pelvic floor. In VL Katz et al., eds., Comprehensive Gynecology, 5th ed., pp. 501-536. Philadelphia: Mosby Elsevier.
"In congenital pediatric prolapses, the plasticity of the endometrium is reduced [...] In severe cases, surgery is necessary—organs may become exposed due to gravitational effects. In less severe cases, it is critical to regularly extend the cavity by insertions [...] Anecdotal case studies of child-abuse in victims which had congenital vaginal prolapses have indicated some benefit of intercourse in prepubescents which did not obtain fissures (Lowel et al., 1992).
If you don't have access to Comprehensive Gynecology, this website also says the same general idea:
> Unhelpful thought #2: sex could worsen my prolapse. Fact: penetrative vaginal intercourse is most unlikely to worsen a vaginal prolapse. If you think about it, having a prolapse means the walls of your vagina are bulging down or your cervix has dropped down within your vagina. Sexual intercourse does not pull or draw a vaginal prolapse down any further, in fact quite the opposite. http://www.pelvicexercises.com.au/prolapse-sex/
(There aren't any webpages which summarize exactly what the medical journal I've cited says, because this is cutting-edge, front-of-the-line medical research and of an extremely rare condition)
Did you know there are some rare cases* where it is necessary for adults to have sex with children? Some hospitals have begun hiring adults specifically for this purpose. The problem is that most adults do not find children sexually attractive. The only way to rectify this problem is to legalize medical child porn in order to increase the sexual appeal of children.
*See: The supporting documents of Lentz GM (2007). Anatomic defects of the abdominal wall and pelvic floor. In VL Katz et al., eds., Comprehensive Gynecology, 5th ed., pp. 501-536. Philadelphia: Mosby Elsevier.
"In congenital pediatric prolapses, the plasticity of the endometrium is reduced [...] In severe cases, surgery is necessary—organs may become exposed due to gravitational effects. In less severe cases, it is critical to regularly extend the cavity by insertions [...] Anecdotal case studies of child-abuse in victims which had congenital vaginal prolapses have indicated some benefit of intercourse in prepubescents which did not obtain fissures (Lowel et al., 1992).
If you don't have access to Comprehensive Gynecology, this website also says the same general idea:
> Unhelpful thought #2: sex could worsen my prolapse. Fact: penetrative vaginal intercourse is most unlikely to worsen a vaginal prolapse. If you think about it, having a prolapse means the walls of your vagina are bulging down or your cervix has dropped down within your vagina. Sexual intercourse does not pull or draw a vaginal prolapse down any further, in fact quite the opposite. http://www.pelvicexercises.com.au/prolapse-sex/
(There aren't any webpages which summarize exactly what the medical journal I've cited says, because this is cutting-edge, front-of-the-line medical research and of an extremely rare condition)