Topic: Looks like we're on food stamps...
Anonymous A started this discussion 15 years ago #16,104
Or "Fresh" as it's called now. :\
Anonymous A (OP) double-posted this 15 years ago, 1 day later[^] [v] #278,804
Apparently, we have $600 in food stamps.
The fuck? From this month and this past month.
The fuck? From this month and this past month.
Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #278,805
what
Anonymous B double-posted this 15 years ago, 12 seconds later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #278,806
are you black
Ks !KansasxqvM joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #278,807
@OP
Sell them for crack and come full circle.
Sell them for crack and come full circle.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #278,808
squeegee !hbZVTk6JYc joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 10 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #278,809
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #278,810
squeegee !hbZVTk6JYc replied with this 15 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #278,813
@previous (A)
you could sell them and buy crack
that's pretty much all you can do with them: food, or crack
you could sell them and buy crack
that's pretty much all you can do with them: food, or crack
(Edited 29 seconds later.)
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 6 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #278,814
Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #278,815
There are more whites on food stamps than blacks. It's proven
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 6 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #278,816
Anonymous E replied with this 15 years ago, 4 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #278,818
s: Some 61 percent of welfare recipients are White, while 33 percent are Black, according to 1990 Census Bureau statistics, the latest figures available.
http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m1077/is_n2_v48/ai_12970819/
Google for more stats
http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m1077/is_n2_v48/ai_12970819/
Google for more stats
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 6 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #278,820
squeegee !hbZVTk6JYc replied with this 15 years ago, 1 hour later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #278,887
Ph !SQAJbBZk/o joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #278,890
Unintentional Jackass !LASXURl1b6 joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 3 seconds later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #278,891
Anonymous H joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 2 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #279,017
@previous (Unintentional Jackass !LASXURl1b6)
Hispanics are classed as white racially by the US government. Check out the wanted lists all the spics are called "white"
Hispanics are classed as white racially by the US government. Check out the wanted lists all the spics are called "white"
Anonymous I joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 19 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #279,026
@278,818 (E)
...and I'm pretty sure black people compromise far less than 33% of the US population...
...and I'm pretty sure black people compromise far less than 33% of the US population...
Anonymous J joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 8 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #279,029
@279,017 (H)
For hate crimes, as a victim they are a protected class, but not as perps. So if a wetback beats up a wetback it's white on minority hate crime. Same for homofags.
For hate crimes, as a victim they are a protected class, but not as perps. So if a wetback beats up a wetback it's white on minority hate crime. Same for homofags.
Anonymous H replied with this 15 years ago, 12 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #279,202
Anonymous H double-posted this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #279,203
Anonymous K joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 33 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #279,205
In certain low end stores, you can buy other things. Look for stores run by indians or hispanics. NYC is biigg on it. I used to buy ciggerettes with mine when I was on it.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 1 hour later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #279,219
Rainbow !DASHqGnDdc joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #279,222
Anonymous I replied with this 15 years ago, 33 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #279,290
Rainbow !DASHqGnDdc replied with this 15 years ago, 7 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #279,314
byzantine erotica !DHyzkOuyNw joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 20 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #279,338
> expect walter> receive anon
Anonymous I replied with this 15 years ago, 10 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #279,346
@279,314 (Rainbow !DASHqGnDdc)
If you do not know what my point of view is, how can you say I'm oversimplifying?
If you do not know what my point of view is, how can you say I'm oversimplifying?
Rainbow !DASHqGnDdc replied with this 15 years ago, 23 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #279,353
@previous (I)
I took an educated guess but would like to know exactly what you think before I start talking about it.
I took an educated guess but would like to know exactly what you think before I start talking about it.
Anonymous I replied with this 15 years ago, 8 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #279,356
@previous (Rainbow !DASHqGnDdc)
I think the figures Anon E posted are meaningless without taking into consideration the overall ethnicity breakdown of America. Carry on with what you would like to say.
I think the figures Anon E posted are meaningless without taking into consideration the overall ethnicity breakdown of America. Carry on with what you would like to say.
Rainbow !DASHqGnDdc replied with this 15 years ago, 24 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #279,368
@previous (I)
It just seemed like you were saying something like "Black people are worthless because 33% of the people on welfare are black but only 12% of USA is black". But it is more complicated than that. You do not factor in why the number is disproportionate. It seems to be gaining a false correlation: "Black people tend to have lower incomes. This is because they are black."
It just seemed like you were saying something like "Black people are worthless because 33% of the people on welfare are black but only 12% of USA is black". But it is more complicated than that. You do not factor in why the number is disproportionate. It seems to be gaining a false correlation: "Black people tend to have lower incomes. This is because they are black."
Anonymous I replied with this 15 years ago, 10 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #279,380
@previous (Rainbow !DASHqGnDdc)
> "Black people tend to have lower incomes. This is because they are black."
Isn't it interesting how people on both sides of the debate argue this?
> "Black people tend to have lower incomes. This is because they are black."
Isn't it interesting how people on both sides of the debate argue this?
Rainbow !DASHqGnDdc replied with this 15 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #279,388
@previous (I)
In reality, the colour of somebody's skin is largely irrelevant nowadays. Socio-economic factors play more importance.
In reality, the colour of somebody's skin is largely irrelevant nowadays. Socio-economic factors play more importance.