Minichan

Topic: Shark fins are now banned in California.

Anonymous A started this discussion 15 years ago #16,051

Californian fans of niche gourmet dishes like shark fin soup have only a few more days to enjoy the controversial delicacy -- if that.

The state of California has made it illegal to buy, sell or possess shark fins starting Jan 1.

Restaurants that obtained shark fins before the end of 2011, however, will be allowed to serve the product until their supply runs out.

http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/new-california-laws-car-seats-child-actors-tanning-277258

Dead !Pool7hVoC2 joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 57 seconds later[^] [v] #277,699

Good.

Nexus !jNexusRe/. joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 10 minutes later, 11 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #277,703

Finally. This horrible practice needs to end.

Falco !PZmcClOUDk joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 45 minutes later, 56 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #277,721

like

HaikerensGuide !0VegJ9Jl.Q joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 17 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #277,732

priorities

Ks !KansasxqvM joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 1 hour later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #277,775

upvote

cccuuunnttt !CaTLdYmooc joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 4 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #277,777

@277,732 (HaikerensGuide !0VegJ9Jl.Q)
It was a high priority for sharks.

Anonymous H joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 15 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #277,784

dam, i liked shark fin soup...
good thing i live ten minutes away from oregon

squeegee !hbZVTk6JYc joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 3 hours later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #277,862

can't they cut off the fin without killing the shark? wouldn't that be a fair compromise?
or would that be like releasing stealth panthers into downtown?

Anonymous J joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 5 hours later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #277,941

More goodness for China I guess.

Anonymous K joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 3 minutes later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #277,942

more statism yay

dw !AIy/L67q.s joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 33 seconds later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #277,943

If they illegalize this they should make all meats illegal

Anonymous K replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #277,944

@previous (dw !AIy/L67q.s)
> expecting logic and consistency from a statist

lol

dw !AIy/L67q.s replied with this 15 years ago, 40 seconds later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #277,945

@previous (K)
you are retarded mountainman

Anonymous J replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #277,946

I still waiting for the magic of evolution to produce a finless species of shark. As this would afford them a considerable survival advantage at the moment, so if evolution's really legit, we should see something emerge soon enough.

Anonymous M joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 23 minutes later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #277,949

@previous (J)
> if evolution's really legit
Can I ask you a serious question? Are you fucking retarded?

(Edited 14 seconds later.)

Anonymous N joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 8 hours later, 21 hours after the original post[^] [v] #278,318

@previous (M)
There's already finless aquatic animals. They'll simply move up the food chain once the sharks are extinct.

(Edited 7 seconds later.)

Anonymous O joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 22 minutes later, 21 hours after the original post[^] [v] #278,335

@277,946 (J)
It's true. Evolution is a load of crap. If there were anything to it, Jews would have evolved invisibility or super-human powers or something sometime around 1943.

Anonymous M replied with this 15 years ago, 4 minutes later, 22 hours after the original post[^] [v] #278,338

@previous (O)
Actually, they did.

Anonymous K replied with this 15 years ago, 3 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #278,437

@previous (M)
dam lol

@277,945 (dw !AIy/L67q.s)
compelling argument

dw !AIy/L67q.s replied with this 15 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #278,440

@previous (K)
do you count what you said as an argument?

Anonymous K replied with this 15 years ago, 2 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #278,464

@previous (dw !AIy/L67q.s)
I agreed with you, then you called me retarded, ipso facto you are retarded
:

Please familiarise yourself with the rules and markup syntax before posting.