http://www.hudson-ny.org/2702/sabaditsch-wolff-appeal
An Austrian appellate court has upheld the conviction of Elisabeth Sabaditsch-Wolff, a Viennese housewife and anti-Jihad activist, for “denigrating religious beliefs†after giving a series of seminars about the dangers of radical Islam.
The December 20 ruling shows that while Judaism and Christianity can be disparaged with impunity in postmodern multicultural Austria, speaking the truth about Islam is subject to swift and hefty legal penalties.
Although the case has major implications for freedom of speech in Austria, as well as in Europe as a whole, it has received virtually no press coverage in the American mainstream media.
Sabaditsch-Wolff’s Kafkaesque legal problems began in November 2009, when she presented a three-part seminar about Islam to the Freedom Education Institute, a political academy linked to the Austrian Freedom Party.
A glossy socialist weekly magazine, NEWS — all in capital letters — planted a journalist in the audience to secretly record the first two lectures. Lawyers for the leftwing publication then handed the transcripts over to the Viennese public prosecutor’s office as evidence of hate speech against Islam, according to Section 283 of the Austrian Criminal Code (Strafgesetzbuch, StGB). Formal charges against Sabaditsch-Wolff were filed in September 2010; and her bench trial, presided on by one multicultural judge and no jury, began November 23, 2010....
[At trial,] Sabaditsch-Wolff was convicted of ... “denigration of religious beliefs of a legally recognized religion,†according to Section 188 of the Austrian Criminal Code.
The judge ruled that Sabaditsch-Wolff committed a crime by stating in her seminars about Islam that the Islamic prophet Mohammed was a pedophile (Sabaditsch-Wolff’s actual words were “Mohammed had a thing for little girls.â€)
The judge rationalized that Mohammed’s sexual contact with nine-year-old Aisha could not be considered pedophilia because Mohammed continued his marriage to Aisha until his death. According to this line of thinking, Mohammed had no exclusive desire for underage girls; he was also attracted to older females because Aisha was 18 years old when Mohammed died....
Sabaditsch-Wolff appealed the conviction to the Provincial Appellate Court (Oberlandesgericht Wien) in Vienna, but that appeal was rejected on December 20....
In January 2009, Susanne Winter, an Austrian politician and Member of Parliament, was convicted for the “crime†of saying that “in today’s system†the Mohammed would be considered a “child molester,†referring to his marriage to Aisha. Winter was also convicted of “incitement†for saying that Austria faces an “Islamic immigration tsunami.â€
Interview with her here: http://frontpagemag.com/2011/12/26/the-persecution-of-elisabeth-sabaditsch-wolff/2/Aside from the obvious intent, she was also a sacrifice to justify future steps against 'hate preachers' in mosques.
They want to show that they're not taking sides, thus leading to more acceptance of these laws.
Besides: nobody liked Ms. Winter.
(Edited 4 minutes later.)
@273,385 (F)
Every day, states around the world harm people, yet some people seem to dedicate their entire lives to being apologists for these evil institutions.