Topic: Obama's Job Approval Drops Below Carter's
Anonymous A started this discussion 15 years ago #15,278
LatestDude !!nEftABMoF joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 2 minutes later[^] [v] #267,542
Judging Obama's job performance by looking at the economy after eight years of Bush drowning our country? Yeah, sounds fair to me.
People are stupid.
People are stupid.
cccuuunnttt !CaTLdYmooc joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 3 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #267,544
@previous (LatestDude !!nEftABMoF)
Presidents are judged on the economy. Obama knew this and campaigned on it, but has failed by every objective measure to turn the economy around the way he promised to. Fair or not, he set up the expectations he's now falling short of.
Presidents are judged on the economy. Obama knew this and campaigned on it, but has failed by every objective measure to turn the economy around the way he promised to. Fair or not, he set up the expectations he's now falling short of.
LatestDude !!nEftABMoF replied with this 15 years ago, 3 minutes later, 6 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #267,546
@previous (cccuuunnttt !CaTLdYmooc)
People expected him to magically fix every single thing wrong with our economy within three years? For every single promise he's failed to keep, I don't recall him advertising that he had dark magic.
People expected him to magically fix every single thing wrong with our economy within three years? For every single promise he's failed to keep, I don't recall him advertising that he had dark magic.
cccuuunnttt !CaTLdYmooc replied with this 15 years ago, 3 minutes later, 9 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #267,551
@previous (LatestDude !!nEftABMoF)
ffs the economy is worse than before he was elected. Going to blame Bush for that?
Democrats should hate themselves for not nominating Clinton.
ffs the economy is worse than before he was elected. Going to blame Bush for that?
Democrats should hate themselves for not nominating Clinton.
Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 11 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #267,552
However bad he is, at least he's not one of those bible-thumping republicans.
LatestDude !!nEftABMoF replied with this 15 years ago, 49 seconds later, 11 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #267,554
@267,551 (cccuuunnttt !CaTLdYmooc)
The full effects of the economic meltdown only truly started to hit after he was elected. They were boiling under the surface for a long time, thanks in a very large way to Bush. Also, if I remember correctly, she dropped out before the primaries. They didn't get a chance to nominate her.
The full effects of the economic meltdown only truly started to hit after he was elected. They were boiling under the surface for a long time, thanks in a very large way to Bush. Also, if I remember correctly, she dropped out before the primaries. They didn't get a chance to nominate her.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 0 seconds later, 11 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #267,555
cccuuunnttt !CaTLdYmooc replied with this 15 years ago, 2 minutes later, 14 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #267,562
LatestDude !!nEftABMoF replied with this 15 years ago, 5 minutes later, 20 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #267,566
@previous (cccuuunnttt !CaTLdYmooc)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hillary_Clinton#Presidential_campaign_of_2008
Partially. Her campaign was still far from being dead before she dropped out of the race.
If Obama is smart, he will either drop Biden, who has literally not done a single thing since becoming VP, and have Hillary be his running mate in 2008. Barring that, appointing her as Secretary of Defense. Both would be prime positions to jump-start a run for presidency in 2016, keeping the Republican ideology out of the White House. Unlike Obama, she has actually shown a reasonable success rate in keeping her political promises.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hillary_Clinton#Presidential_campaign_of_2008
Partially. Her campaign was still far from being dead before she dropped out of the race.
If Obama is smart, he will either drop Biden, who has literally not done a single thing since becoming VP, and have Hillary be his running mate in 2008. Barring that, appointing her as Secretary of Defense. Both would be prime positions to jump-start a run for presidency in 2016, keeping the Republican ideology out of the White House. Unlike Obama, she has actually shown a reasonable success rate in keeping her political promises.
cccuuunnttt !CaTLdYmooc replied with this 15 years ago, 2 minutes later, 22 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #267,569
LatestDude !!nEftABMoF replied with this 15 years ago, 53 seconds later, 23 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #267,570
@previous (cccuuunnttt !CaTLdYmooc)
You? Showing a reactionary opposition to intellectualism of any kind? I'm shocked, cccuuunnttt. Really.
You? Showing a reactionary opposition to intellectualism of any kind? I'm shocked, cccuuunnttt. Really.
Anonymous D replied with this 15 years ago, 52 seconds later, 24 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #267,571
cccuuunnttt !CaTLdYmooc replied with this 15 years ago, 2 minutes later, 26 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #267,578
@267,570 (LatestDude !!nEftABMoF)
Quite true, good sir. When people start citing Wikipedia, I get super intimidated. :-(
Quite true, good sir. When people start citing Wikipedia, I get super intimidated. :-(
LatestDude !!nEftABMoF replied with this 15 years ago, 48 seconds later, 27 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #267,579
@previous (cccuuunnttt !CaTLdYmooc)
I was referring more towards your inability to read, and formulate a basic response to, six sentences.
I was referring more towards your inability to read, and formulate a basic response to, six sentences.
Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 6 seconds later, 27 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #267,580
Obama keeps giving free technology to Iran. The economy is only one of the things that makes him a terrible president.
cccuuunnttt !CaTLdYmooc replied with this 15 years ago, 5 minutes later, 33 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #267,585
Anonymous D replied with this 15 years ago, 4 minutes later, 37 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #267,589
Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 1 hour later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #267,633
@OP
None of those numbers mean anything without error-bars.
None of those numbers mean anything without error-bars.
Anonymous G joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 6 hours later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #267,928
Isn't LatestDude a pedophile from AnonTalk?