Notice: You have been identified as a bot, so no internal UID will be assigned to you. If you are a real person messing with your useragent, you should change it back to something normal.
dreamworks !AIy/L67q.s replied with this 15 years ago, 47 minutes later, 13 hours after the original post[^][v]#262,459
@previous (D)
they could call twitter a chan but that doesn't make it so
Anonymous L joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 56 minutes later, 14 hours after the original post[^][v]#262,464
Not funny, didn't read. Still voting for Ron Paul. If you don't fucking like it I guess you better vote for Obama, cause when Paul runs as a third party candidate I'm voting for him then too.
Anonymous M joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 8 minutes later, 14 hours after the original post[^][v]#262,466
@previous (L)
you do know hes planning on increasing taxes right?
Anonymous L replied with this 15 years ago, 13 minutes later, 14 hours after the original post[^][v]#262,469
@previous (M)
Still voting for him. It's a matter of ideological imperative. The Republican party is pathetic and stands for nothing now, nothing other than "not the democrats." It's shameful and useless. I'm voting for Ron Paul because it's time the Republican party renewed its commitment to personal freedom and individual responsibility.
(Edited 20 seconds later.)
floorboard !hbZVTk6JYc replied with this 15 years ago, 3 minutes later, 14 hours after the original post[^][v]#262,470
@previous (L) > i'm voting for ron paul because i want to take votes away from real candidates and ensure Obama has a second term
Anonymous L replied with this 15 years ago, 8 minutes later, 14 hours after the original post[^][v]#262,472
@previous (floorboard !hbZVTk6JYc) > I'm not voting for ron paul because i want to give votes to full of shit candidates and ensure our politicians remain full of shit.
It's my fucking vote so you can go fuck a shit up your ass for all I care. You're voting from a place of fear, I'm voting from a place of desire. That makes me the better person.
And you don't like it maybe you should vote for my candidate instead of attempting to scare me into voting for your pet jackass. It's not as if Gingrinch or Romney have a snowballs chance in hell of beating Obama anyhow. I can see through the pathetic 3rd grade manipulation tactics pal.
floorboard !hbZVTk6JYc replied with this 15 years ago, 6 minutes later, 14 hours after the original post[^][v]#262,474
@previous (L)
Fine, just vote for whoever you find most attractive then.
Anonymous N joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 13 minutes later, 15 hours after the original post[^][v]#262,475
@262,470 (floorboard !hbZVTk6JYc)
I lol'd hard. This is actually what will happen. So many eccentrics and bandwagoners have convinced themselves that Ron Paul actually has a chance that Obama won't be up against any real resistance.
Anonymous O joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 5 hours later, 20 hours after the original post[^][v]#262,627
@previous (N)
If it forces Republicans to finally admit Gingrinch is not viable candidate it will be a vote well cast.
Anonymous N replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 20 hours after the original post[^][v]#262,629
@previous (O)
But they're republicans. Nobody can make them admit anything.
Anonymous P joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 39 minutes later, 20 hours after the original post[^][v]#262,674
@262,464 (L) > when Paul runs as a third party candidate
I hope he does. More buttmad Republican complaining about traitors splitting the vote will be some much needed election-time comic relief.