Topic: So I think this blog is pretty good in the way it goes about its topic.
Unintentional Jackass !LASXURl1b6 started this discussion 15 years ago #14,809
http://understand-pedophilia.tumblr.com/
Do you think this is a good thing to have?
Is it weird to see tumblr actually used in a way that could be seen as useful?
Do you think this is a good thing to have?
Is it weird to see tumblr actually used in a way that could be seen as useful?
| Poll option | Votes | Percentage | Graph |
|---|---|---|---|
| Yes | 2 | 67% | |
| No | 1 | 33% |
Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 6 minutes later[^] [v] #261,119
You ask 2 questions and my answer is yes and no respectively.
I like the blog.
I like the blog.
Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 34 minutes later, 40 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #261,122
Just to clarify, which question is it you want an answer to in the poll? 'Cause you ask two questions...
Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 16 minutes later, 57 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #261,123
I guess you have to break new concepts in slowly, but it seems they are for the moment still pushing the "sex is evil and intrinsically sinful/immoral/harmful" line. oh well
There definition of paraphilia is also hopelessly subjective. Pedophilia is more "normal" than homosexuality, yet for no apparent reason, gender paraphilias are given their own special category. The clinical definition of pedophilia as a mental illness is ridiculous as well - it requires that â€the fantasies cause marked distress or interpersonal difficulty.†Distress and interpersonal difficulties are caused by other people! In fundamentalist Islamic or Christian societies, homosexual fantasies would cause "marked distress or interpersonal difficultyâ€, but in a tolerant, liberal society they do not. The definition of pedophilia as a mental illness is a self-fulfilling prophecy - it encourages people to cause "marked distress or interpersonal difficulties" to pedophiles.
Meh, whatever. There are more important battles to be fought lol.
There definition of paraphilia is also hopelessly subjective. Pedophilia is more "normal" than homosexuality, yet for no apparent reason, gender paraphilias are given their own special category. The clinical definition of pedophilia as a mental illness is ridiculous as well - it requires that â€the fantasies cause marked distress or interpersonal difficulty.†Distress and interpersonal difficulties are caused by other people! In fundamentalist Islamic or Christian societies, homosexual fantasies would cause "marked distress or interpersonal difficultyâ€, but in a tolerant, liberal society they do not. The definition of pedophilia as a mental illness is a self-fulfilling prophecy - it encourages people to cause "marked distress or interpersonal difficulties" to pedophiles.
Meh, whatever. There are more important battles to be fought lol.
Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 9 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #261,124
Anonymous B replied with this 15 years ago, 11 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #261,125
@261,123 (D)
the general consensus is that sex IS harmful when it involves children. Because 9 times out of 10, it is.
the general consensus is that sex IS harmful when it involves children. Because 9 times out of 10, it is.
Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #261,126
Anonymous D replied with this 15 years ago, 1 hour later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #261,139
@261,124 (E)
I'm commenting on the similarity of the acts, not their moral value etc.
I'm commenting on the similarity of the acts, not their moral value etc.
(Edited 4 minutes later.)
Anonymous D double-posted this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #261,140
@261,125 (B)
I'm challenging the general consensus, obviously. "Sex is harmful because it is" is not a very convincing argument.
I'm challenging the general consensus, obviously. "Sex is harmful because it is" is not a very convincing argument.
Anonymous D triple-posted this 15 years ago, 5 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #261,142
@261,126 (F)
> But the body
Do you mean not ready as in they are not fertile? Or not ready as in penetrative vaginal or anal sex will cause damage? Both situations can occur in adult women also and are not exclusive to children. They are separate issues, quite unrelated to age disparate sexual relationships.
> and mind of a child is not ready for sex.
Are you suggesting there is a moral or spiritual significance to sexual intercourse? That it is anything more than a physical act? Try to escape your puritanical upbringing and apply logic to this area, one of the many "logic-free" zones in Western thought.
> But the body
Do you mean not ready as in they are not fertile? Or not ready as in penetrative vaginal or anal sex will cause damage? Both situations can occur in adult women also and are not exclusive to children. They are separate issues, quite unrelated to age disparate sexual relationships.
> and mind of a child is not ready for sex.
Are you suggesting there is a moral or spiritual significance to sexual intercourse? That it is anything more than a physical act? Try to escape your puritanical upbringing and apply logic to this area, one of the many "logic-free" zones in Western thought.
dreamworks !AIy/L67q.s joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 5 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #261,146
2 questions
1 poll
what do
1 poll
what do
El !EditoGGK32 joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 7 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #261,150
WadeWilson[insert my tripcode joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 1 hour later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #261,165
Anonymous F replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #261,166
@previous (WadeWilson[insert my tripcode)
He can try to justify it all he wants but if he acts on it he'll be v&. :D
He can try to justify it all he wants but if he acts on it he'll be v&. :D
Anonymous D replied with this 15 years ago, 18 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #261,168
@261,165 (WadeWilson[insert my tripcode)
God I hate it when people are closed minded and hate things they know nothing about.
God I hate it when people are closed minded and hate things they know nothing about.
buspupps !!hkv8K5ZEY joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 2 hours later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #261,288
@261,142 (D)
I think that children are very easily exploited which is why child-adult sex should be discouraged.
I think that children are very easily exploited which is why child-adult sex should be discouraged.
WadeWilson[insert my tripcode replied with this 15 years ago, 6 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #261,290
@261,168 (D)
Yeah, ok. Whatever helps you sleep at night dude. I was a kid once, almost fucked a 13 year old when I was 17.
Yeah, ok. Whatever helps you sleep at night dude. I was a kid once, almost fucked a 13 year old when I was 17.
buspupps !!hkv8K5ZEY replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #261,291
WadeWilson[insert my tripcode replied with this 15 years ago, 2 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #261,294
@previous (buspupps !!hkv8K5ZEY)
I didn't say it was, I just left out my point. My point was, 13 year olds can't handle sex in the same way that, say, 23 year olds can
I didn't say it was, I just left out my point. My point was, 13 year olds can't handle sex in the same way that, say, 23 year olds can
buspupps !!hkv8K5ZEY replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #261,295
Anonymous K joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 1 hour later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #261,373
Children are fucking property in the eyes of the law. That's just how it is so long as Parents care for them adequately.
You don't get to use someone else's property without permission. Pedophiles don't understand this, and that's why parents hate them.
You don't get to use someone else's property without permission. Pedophiles don't understand this, and that's why parents hate them.
Anonymous D replied with this 15 years ago, 24 minutes later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #261,395
@261,288 (buspupps !!hkv8K5ZEY)
That still doesn't follow. If you said "I think that children are very easily exploited which is why all interaction between adults and children should be discouraged" that would make sense, but your statement as it currently stands implies some sort of moral or spiritual significance to sexual intercourse that simply does not exist.
That still doesn't follow. If you said "I think that children are very easily exploited which is why all interaction between adults and children should be discouraged" that would make sense, but your statement as it currently stands implies some sort of moral or spiritual significance to sexual intercourse that simply does not exist.
Anonymous D double-posted this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #261,396
@261,290 (WadeWilson[insert my tripcode)
@261,294 (WadeWilson[insert my tripcode)
Lol that is in no way a "point" or logical conclusion of your first post.
@261,294 (WadeWilson[insert my tripcode)
Lol that is in no way a "point" or logical conclusion of your first post.
Anonymous D triple-posted this 15 years ago, 23 seconds later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #261,397
WadeWilson[insert my tripcode replied with this 15 years ago, 5 minutes later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #261,400
@261,396 (D)
My first post, no. But they do explain withoay these things without listening to pedo justifications.
My first post, no. But they do explain withoay these things without listening to pedo justifications.
buspupps !!hkv8K5ZEY replied with this 15 years ago, 6 hours later, 15 hours after the original post[^] [v] #261,562
Children cannot understand the mental or physical issues that accompany sex. Its also much harder for them to reject sex partners. I don't know what you meant By the "spiritual" comment.@261,395 (D)