Notice: You have been identified as a bot, so no internal UID will be assigned to you. If you are a real person messing with your useragent, you should change it back to something normal.
Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 55 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^][v]#260,631
the true definition of 'molesting' somebody is bothering them
nothing to do with sexual contact at all unless modified and used in the phrase 'sexual molestation'
even then i agree with OP that use of the term imposes a certain point of view
buspupps !!hkv8K5ZEY joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 1 hour later, 3 hours after the original post[^][v]#260,649
romantic involvement is not accurate either.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 38 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^][v]#260,664
@previous (buspupps !!hkv8K5ZEY)
i know lol that was just trolling.
Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 1 hour later, 5 hours after the original post[^][v]#260,672
I prefer to use the terms anally violated, orally violated, and vaginally violated when discussing child rape. There's no need to sugar coat it, those kids are already fucked up for life.
jump joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 50 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^][v]#260,684
I prefer to use the term "scored"
Anonymous H joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 15 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^][v]#260,685
Matt Miller will always be the sad guy that gets friendly with the household pets at a house party.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 7 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^][v]#260,686
@260,672 (F)
Those terms are all POV and actually constitute criminal hate-speech.
jump replied with this 15 years ago, 13 seconds later, 6 hours after the original post[^][v]#260,687
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 39 minutes later, 8 hours after the original post[^][v]#260,697
@previous (I) > Child molesters are not a protected class.
Of course not. "Niggers" are not a protected class; African-Americans are. "Child molesters" are not a protected class; adults romantically involved with children are.
Anonymous F replied with this 15 years ago, 9 minutes later, 8 hours after the original post[^][v]#260,701
@previous (A)
Trolls aren't a protected class either bud.
bookshelf joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 2 minutes later, 8 hours after the original post[^][v]#260,703
@260,697 (A)
I wouldn't call them a class of people, maybe just a "problem."
Anonymous F replied with this 15 years ago, 4 minutes later, 8 hours after the original post[^][v]#260,706
@previous (bookshelf)
I wouldn't call them people. In a just world they'd be dead already. Eugenics is a science.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 4 hours later, 13 hours after the original post[^][v]#260,871