Notice: You have been identified as a bot, so no internal UID will be assigned to you. If you are a real person messing with your useragent, you should change it back to something normal.
Im suprised there aren't brute forces for vanity .onion addresses yet.
(Edited 27 seconds later.)
Anonymous H replied with this 15 years ago, 5 minutes later, 17 hours after the original post[^][v]#260,727
@previous (G)
You need to be careful, most of these silkroad address are fakes now. You send bitcoin, you get jack. But it's good, it's exposing a flaw in bitcoin design. A flaw the next generation of crypto will overcome.
Anonymous G replied with this 15 years ago, 2 minutes later, 17 hours after the original post[^][v]#260,731
@previous (H)
What are the ideas of how the next generation could improve?
Anonymous H replied with this 15 years ago, 8 minutes later, 18 hours after the original post[^][v]#260,738
@previous (G)
Oh a bunch of shit. Most of the better ones center around the idea of "trusted addresses." You can't stop scammers from getting new addresses, obviously, but that'd be like not having a credit report. You'd still have to prove yourself.
The main complication with this concept is it screws anonymity. But really, anonymity in bitcoin is starting to look like a delusion anyhow.
(Edited 17 seconds later.)
Anonymous E replied with this 15 years ago, 1 hour later, 19 hours after the original post[^][v]#260,756