Topic: Why do women retire before men?
Anonymous A started this discussion 15 years ago #14,723
Should it not be the other way around?| Poll option | Votes | Percentage | Graph |
|---|---|---|---|
| lolwomen | 4 | 67% | |
| lolwomen | 2 | 33% |
marvin !CaTLdYmooc joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 33 minutes later[^] [v] #259,675
Because they're more likely to assume a caretaker role for a dying parent?
Because husbands and wives tend to retire around the same time, and women are typically younger than their spouse?
Because husbands and wives tend to retire around the same time, and women are typically younger than their spouse?
Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 35 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #259,676
Because the patriarchy is trying to keep women down.
Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 9 minutes later, 45 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #259,680
In the UK by 2026 the pension age will be 67 for both women and men.lolwomen
(Edited 1 minute later.)
Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 48 seconds later, 45 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #259,681
There's more women living on life insurance payouts then there are men.
Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 11 minutes later, 57 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #259,685
Because they are lazy.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 1 hour later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #259,717
@259,675 (marvin !CaTLdYmooc)
> Because they're more likely to assume a caretaker role for a dying parent?
Bullshit.
@259,675 (marvin !CaTLdYmooc)
> Because husbands and wives tend to retire around the same time, and women are typically younger than their spouse?
Yes, but that women will live longer while the man won't.
@259,680 (D)
Really? Cool.
@259,681 (E)
(Citation needed.)
@previous (F)
I agree. Men are also more likely to be doing physical jobs too.
> Because they're more likely to assume a caretaker role for a dying parent?
Bullshit.
@259,675 (marvin !CaTLdYmooc)
> Because husbands and wives tend to retire around the same time, and women are typically younger than their spouse?
Yes, but that women will live longer while the man won't.
@259,680 (D)
Really? Cool.
@259,681 (E)
(Citation needed.)
@previous (F)
I agree. Men are also more likely to be doing physical jobs too.
Anonymous E replied with this 15 years ago, 1 hour later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #259,736
@previous (A)
> (Citation needed.)
Really? You really need a citation even when it's common knowledge women outlive men by an average of 5 to 10 years longer than men? Really? It's a simple matter of connecting the dots retard.
Fucking google it asshole.
> (Citation needed.)
Really? You really need a citation even when it's common knowledge women outlive men by an average of 5 to 10 years longer than men? Really? It's a simple matter of connecting the dots retard.
Fucking google it asshole.
(Edited 35 seconds later.)
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #259,737
Anonymous E replied with this 15 years ago, 9 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #259,743
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #259,744
Anonymous E replied with this 15 years ago, 6 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #259,748
@previous (A)
The poster did not say "citation requested" or "citation would be appreciated," but "citation needed." This gave me serious asspie rage as it should be a matter of basic common sense to hypothesize that since women are known to live longer than men statistically, it should follow logically they are more likely to outlive their male counterparts and therefore more likely to collect life insurance proceeds than men are. Holy shit. It's not rocket science.
Citation needed implies I am trying to prove something when in fact I am not. This is why I post anonymously. The idea stands on its own and the reader must determine it's validity. It's not about securing an identity like it always is with namefags.
The poster did not say "citation requested" or "citation would be appreciated," but "citation needed." This gave me serious asspie rage as it should be a matter of basic common sense to hypothesize that since women are known to live longer than men statistically, it should follow logically they are more likely to outlive their male counterparts and therefore more likely to collect life insurance proceeds than men are. Holy shit. It's not rocket science.
Citation needed implies I am trying to prove something when in fact I am not. This is why I post anonymously. The idea stands on its own and the reader must determine it's validity. It's not about securing an identity like it always is with namefags.
Anonymous D replied with this 15 years ago, 9 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #259,757
@previous (E)
The difference in life expectancy is only a few years.
derp :D
The difference in life expectancy is only a few years.
derp :D
(Edited 4 minutes later.)
Anonymous E replied with this 15 years ago, 2 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #259,759
@previous (D)
You're so fucking stupid. If women LACK life insurance it means nobody will get any money when they fucking die. Whereas if men HAVE life insurance it means people get money when they die.
Either you trolling of the retardation in here is fucking incredible.
You're so fucking stupid. If women LACK life insurance it means nobody will get any money when they fucking die. Whereas if men HAVE life insurance it means people get money when they die.
Either you trolling of the retardation in here is fucking incredible.
Anonymous D replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #259,761
Anonymous F replied with this 15 years ago, 2 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #259,763
Anonymous D replied with this 15 years ago, 39 seconds later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #259,764
Anonymous E replied with this 15 years ago, 5 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #259,768
Anonymous D replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #259,769
marvin !CaTLdYmooc replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #259,772
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #259,776
@previous (marvin !CaTLdYmooc)
I'm not trolling. Don't try to label this topic as a troll thread just because you don't agree with it.
I'm not trolling. Don't try to label this topic as a troll thread just because you don't agree with it.
