Notice: You have been identified as a bot, so no internal UID will be assigned to you. If you are a real person messing with your useragent, you should change it back to something normal.
Topic: do you think the kindle fire is worth getting
Ishikawa !Et8Dragonk started this discussion 15 years ago#14,397
I have a few dollars left after I get the laptop I chose do you think it would be a good buy? If I do get it I will be running a program called mantano. I personally do not like using kindle books. ePub is better for me.
Meta replied with this 15 years ago, 4 minutes later, 38 minutes after the original post[^][v]#255,076
@previous (E)
Yes, it would probably fit in my purse but still, 7" is just the wrong size for a tablet. Tablets should be either 5" or smaller, or 10".
Anonymous C replied with this 15 years ago, 18 minutes later, 57 minutes after the original post[^][v]#255,096
@previous (Meta) > Tablets should be either 5" or smaller, or 10".
sounds pretty arbitrary to me
Ks !KansasxqvM joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 59 minutes after the original post[^][v]#255,103
NO! There are better readers for ebooks that are cheaper, many people say they prefer older ebook readers to the Fire. Some of the cheaper ones Pando(?) ereaders can be turned into tablets with droid. Look into the cheaper ereaders. If you have a DS, just use that for ereading.
Meta replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^][v]#255,110
@255,096 (C)
You're right. They should make a 32" iPad and a 1.57" Samsung Galaxy Tab.
Fuck ergonomics.
Anonymous C replied with this 15 years ago, 6 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^][v]#255,132
@previous (Meta)
are you implying that amazon didn't test the ergonomics of their new kindle?
people like 7" tablets
what you want is not necessarily what other people want
Anonymous G joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 25 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^][v]#255,174
@previous (C)
lol. people like anything new and shiny.
BTW, why would I buy a 5" tablet when my smartphone is nearly that big?
Anonymous H joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 13 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^][v]#255,179
iPadâ„¢
Ishikawa !Et8Dragonk (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 50 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^][v]#255,190
@255,103 (Ks !KansasxqvM)
If you can find me whatever pando is a look it up rather than go straight for the kindle.
Ishikawa !Et8Dragonk (OP) double-posted this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 hours after the original post[^][v]#255,191
You can pick a Pandigital ereader for less than a hundred bucks from Amazon. There is also a lot of 3rd party stuff to do with it. Essentially you get a droid tablet for less than a hundred bucks. Best deal around.
Anonymous C replied with this 15 years ago, 13 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^][v]#255,196
@previous (Ks !KansasxqvM)
Kindle fire has a dual core processor clocked @ 1Ghz though
what good is an android tablet with no power?
hardly any good is what
also free amazon prime (for a month anyway then it's 6 bucks per month) which equals free access to all video and music available for streaming on amazon
Ishikawa !Et8Dragonk (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 13 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^][v]#255,201
@255,193 (Ks !KansasxqvM)
All I see is stuff with 1 or 2 gigabytes for 120 dollars are they expandable?
Ishikawa !Et8Dragonk (OP) double-posted this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 3 hours after the original post[^][v]#255,202
@255,196 (C)
I have netflix youtube and ereader all in 1. amazon prime really doesn't sound exciting but it's worth trying I guess.
Anonymous I joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 10 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^][v]#255,203
Yes. Ignore all the other faggots ITT.
Ishikawa !Et8Dragonk (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 10 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^][v]#255,208
I think I might as well get it I'm gonna mod it anyways. I like all the different versions there are of android OS.
Ks !KansasxqvM replied with this 15 years ago, 3 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^][v]#255,209
@255,196 (C)
Tablets are really just be used for light surfing, reading, emailing, streaming etc, having more power is good and all; but for what?
@255,201 (Ishikawa !Et8Dragonk)
There are several models for under $120. No, they are not expandable, but it's not a netbook or laptop it's a tablet and should be used as such.
Anonymous C replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 3 hours after the original post[^][v]#255,210
@previous (Ks !KansasxqvM)
3D games and other processor intensive applications
Ishikawa !Et8Dragonk (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 4 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^][v]#255,212
@255,209 (Ks !KansasxqvM)
but that's a problem right there I have more than 2 gigs worth of books alone. I have about 6.
Ks !KansasxqvM replied with this 15 years ago, 18 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^][v]#255,220
@previous (Ishikawa !Et8Dragonk)
You need 6 GB of books on your reader at a time? 0_0
You want the Fire get the Fire. Or pay less than half price and get something that does pretty much the same thing.
Ishikawa !Et8Dragonk (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 5 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^][v]#255,222
@previous (Ks !KansasxqvM)
I like variety it's more of a relaxing thing. I'm still up in the air but it looks like I may be getting the kindle fire but the tablet that you showed me it's kind of interesting but I don't like the fact that has a camera. Not everything needs a camera.
Meta replied with this 15 years ago, 5 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^][v]#255,223
@255,193 (Ks !KansasxqvM) > You can pick a Pandigital ereader for less than a hundred bucks from Amazon. There is also a lot of 3rd party stuff to do with it. Essentially you get a droid tablet for less than a hundred bucks. Best deal around.
Have you actually used the $100 Pandigital Android tablets? They are just awful. There's a reason they're so cheap.
Ks !KansasxqvM replied with this 15 years ago, 45 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^][v]#255,235
@previous (Meta)
No. I was looking at ereaders recently and ran across the Pandigitals. What is so awful about them?
Anonymous J joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 3 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^][v]#255,236
Anonymous K joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 5 hours after the original post[^][v]#255,237
No. No I don't.
Ks !KansasxqvM replied with this 15 years ago, 8 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^][v]#255,239
@255,223 (Meta)
Elaborating. I don't think I'd ever buy and ereader, but if I did I would go for the simple cheap versions. Ereaders aren't as capable as netbooks so don't buy them for that, they're not even as capable as a powerful cell phone. If a person buys an ereader they ought to be buying one almost strictly for reading books, and they work great for that purpose, if a person want more than that they should be buying something else. From what I've been reading people say the black and white screen versions are pretty much the best for reading ebooks. Simple, cheap and effective. I wouldn't advocate someone buying an ereader for much more than reading ebooks, but if they want a little more than that the Pandigital seems to be a good buy. I can't see the sense in having a laptop and a kindle fire, but it's not my money. OP seems interested in just reading books, so really she should be shopping for the simple ereaders, no Pandigital or Fire, just old school ereaders.
Anonymous C replied with this 15 years ago, 4 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^][v]#255,242
@255,236 (J)
you say that like every phone is 1.2 Ghz and that it's not at all impressive
your phone is probably from this year or you paid 600 dollars for it last year
also that 1Ghz i mentioned is underclocked from 1.5 Ghz
battery life is important too
(Edited 48 seconds later.)
Anonymous J replied with this 15 years ago, 29 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^][v]#255,248
Fox !FXYGNx1XR. joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 57 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^][v]#255,289
Yes, definitely. I love mine for browsing. with the flawless flash support on the quick stock browser.
It's got very loud and very sharp speakers for all of the free videos you'll be watching from the free Prime thing, which includes most any TV show or movie one can think of.
The 7" size is very portable, and it's quite light. The back is a very soft but grippable rubber and the front is Gorilla glass, so you'll be scratch-free for quite a while.
It's Android. A freaky flavor of Android, but Android nonetheless. The Amazon appstore is meh, because it doesn't really have that many apps, but that's fixable. I've got the regular Market on mine already and basically have any app I'd ever need.
jump joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 25 minutes later, 8 hours after the original post[^][v]#255,291
@previous (Fox !FXYGNx1XR.)
Prime doesnt have most tv shows or movies. It has less than Netflix.
Prime is free second day shipping for all items purchased through amazon. That's where it shines. I've watched a few of the nature shows and a documentary or two. They don't have much good shit on there, but it's getting better every day. It's still new.
Netflix is gonna have new arrested development, though. So, I mean.. I guess Ill have both.
r04r !GETFUCKED joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 25 minutes later, 8 hours after the original post[^][v]#255,301
If you want an e-reader for a good reading experience, then no. Get something with e-ink.
If you want a tablet that can also read books, maybe. It's a locked down version of android (Though you can always root it and add the google stuff back in so it's actually usable).
Lastly, 6GB of e-books at one time? What the. You don't need that many books on a reader at one time ever. My kindle 3 has 3GB of storage, and that's more than enough. Just use some library software like http://calibre-ebook.com/ to manage your books.
p.s. Calibre can convert any e-book between any format so you can turn all your epubs into mobis for native use on amazon devices.
Anonymous I replied with this 15 years ago, 25 minutes later, 9 hours after the original post[^][v]#255,306
@previous (r04r !GETFUCKED) > Lastly, 6GB of e-books at one time? What the. You don't need that many books on a reader at one time ever. My kindle 3 has 3GB of storage, and that's more than enough.
This. Aren't kindle ebooks like 800kB? That would be what, 7,800 books?
r04r !GETFUCKED replied with this 15 years ago, 20 minutes later, 9 hours after the original post[^][v]#255,319
@previous (I)
Something like that. They can be a bit bigger depending on size, and images used, but not a whole lot more.
I usually don't put more than 10 books inn my kindle at once but that's because of its shitty grouping support.
Anonymous G replied with this 15 years ago, 4 hours later, 13 hours after the original post[^][v]#255,441
Ishikawa !Et8Dragonk (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 25 minutes later, 14 hours after the original post[^][v]#255,448
@255,301 (r04r !GETFUCKED)
For the longest time i have had limited resources when it comes to my e books. I had no where else to put some
Ishikawa !Et8Dragonk (OP) double-posted this 15 years ago, 2 hours later, 16 hours after the original post[^][v]#255,465
I think I will look into other readers but right now the kindle looks the best. The storage room was a problem because all I had was the phone. But now I will have laptop and ereader so the phone is invalid.
Anonymous O joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 2 days later, 3 days after the original post[^][v]#256,986
I'm not sure how it is as an e-reader, but I've played with one and I can tell you the browser on the Kindle Fire is absolutely unmatched. I only partly understand the details of how it works, but the user experience is untouchable. If you think Chrome is a good browser you will love the kindle fire browser.
(Edited 3 minutes later.)
Fox !FXYGNx1XR. replied with this 15 years ago, 3 minutes later, 3 days after the original post[^][v]#256,987