Topic: Should we revoke rights from women?
Anonymous A started this discussion 15 years ago #14,246
Why do I always hear people say women are only good for sex and reproduction? Why do I always hear them say they are not people? Why do I not hate women as much as everyone else I've encountered?
green !6PPj7P5Iag joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 3 minutes later[^] [v] #252,714
Women is a pretty cool guy. Eh has periods and doesn't afraid of anything.
Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 36 minutes later, 39 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #252,717
Rights can not be revoked. They are endowed by our Creator and evident from reason.
Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 8 hours later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #252,903
@previous (C)
> Rights can not be revoked.
Wrong:
Men have authority over women because Allah has made the one superior to the other, and because they spend their wealth to maintain them. Good women are obedient. They guard their unseen parts because God has guarded them. As for those from whom you fear disobedience, admonish them and forsake them in beds apart, beat them. - Quran 4:34
> Rights can not be revoked.
Wrong:
Men have authority over women because Allah has made the one superior to the other, and because they spend their wealth to maintain them. Good women are obedient. They guard their unseen parts because God has guarded them. As for those from whom you fear disobedience, admonish them and forsake them in beds apart, beat them. - Quran 4:34
(Edited 12 seconds later.)
Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 2 minutes later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #252,907
[^_^] !jdsE866Dak joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 5 hours later, 15 hours after the original post[^] [v] #253,152
> Implying women have rights
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 13 minutes later, 15 hours after the original post[^] [v] #253,162
Anonymous D replied with this 15 years ago, 4 minutes later, 15 hours after the original post[^] [v] #253,164
Anonymous G joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 9 minutes later, 15 hours after the original post[^] [v] #253,167
@253,162 (A)
are you a moron?
men used to have the right to beat their women and make them wear veils and shit, dawg.
then that right was revoked.
get it?
are you a moron?
men used to have the right to beat their women and make them wear veils and shit, dawg.
then that right was revoked.
get it?
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 11 minutes later, 15 hours after the original post[^] [v] #253,169
Anonymous H joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 12 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #253,457
Everyone hates women because they want to be men, and nobody trusts men.
People still like Asian and Filipino women, even thought they have nasty looking vaginas.
People still like Asian and Filipino women, even thought they have nasty looking vaginas.
cccuuunnttt !nIGga.SL0w replied with this 15 years ago, 47 seconds later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #253,460
Men have authority over women because Allah has made the one superior to the other, and because they spend their wealth to maintain them. Good women are obedient. They guard their unseen parts because God has guarded them. As for those from whom you fear disobedience, admonish them and forsake them in beds apart, beat them. - Quran 4:34
buspuppie !!hkv8K5ZEY joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 42 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #253,501
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 12 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #253,956
Namefag !H1lTt2ac4o joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 5 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #254,012
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 3 hours later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #254,073
cccuuunnttt !nIGga.SL0w replied with this 15 years ago, 2 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #254,075
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #254,076
cccuuunnttt !nIGga.SL0w replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #254,077
cccuuunnttt !nIGga.SL0w replied with this 15 years ago, 35 seconds later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #254,078
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 6 days later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #258,066
@previous (cccuuunnttt !nIGga.SL0w)
And what makes you a person?
@254,077 (cccuuunnttt !nIGga.SL0w)
I'm starting to think you're here to troll Minichan by pretending to be a Muslim. I saw you post on Tinychan and you didn't even pull out this shtick.
And what makes you a person?
@254,077 (cccuuunnttt !nIGga.SL0w)
I'm starting to think you're here to troll Minichan by pretending to be a Muslim. I saw you post on Tinychan and you didn't even pull out this shtick.
Freecode !!4IKKtS9GG joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 2 hours later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #258,083
Depends on how you define rights. Many individuals' perceived "rights" encroach heavily on the autonomy of others, but in the literal sense people should not have their liberty curtailed.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 1 hour later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #258,088
Unintentional Jackass !LASXURl1b6 joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 1 hour later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #258,115
@previous (A)
The government-imposed ones, or the god-given ones? Because the former are fickle, and the latter don't exist.
The government-imposed ones, or the god-given ones? Because the former are fickle, and the latter don't exist.
(Edited 44 seconds later.)
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #258,116
@previous (Unintentional Jackass !LASXURl1b6)
I mean the human rights we've evolved to know of through our frontal lobe.
You honestly believe humans are bad because of the few psychopaths with damaged frontal lobes?
Do you even watch the Investigation Discovery program Most Evil?
I mean the human rights we've evolved to know of through our frontal lobe.
You honestly believe humans are bad because of the few psychopaths with damaged frontal lobes?
Do you even watch the Investigation Discovery program Most Evil?
Unintentional Jackass !LASXURl1b6 replied with this 15 years ago, 5 minutes later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #258,120
@previous (A)
I don't recall saying that humans are inherently bad, only that there was no such thing as human rights. I'm an environmental determinist, I believe that every mental problem or defect is purely due to environmental, and not physical factors.
I don't recall saying that humans are inherently bad, only that there was no such thing as human rights. I'm an environmental determinist, I believe that every mental problem or defect is purely due to environmental, and not physical factors.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #258,122
@previous (Unintentional Jackass !LASXURl1b6)
Human rights go hand in hand with morality. You wouldn't kill another human being therefore you believe that human being is entitled to life.
Human rights go hand in hand with morality. You wouldn't kill another human being therefore you believe that human being is entitled to life.
Unintentional Jackass !LASXURl1b6 replied with this 15 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #258,123
@previous (A)
This is due to learning while growing up that life is a precious thing, something to be treasured and not taken unnecessarily. If not for that, I would have no problem taking another life. Even your most basic human right is naught but a social construct. Cannibals do not believe that humans have the right to life. Pro-abortionists do not believe that a potential human is entitled to life at the inconvenience of the mother.
This is due to learning while growing up that life is a precious thing, something to be treasured and not taken unnecessarily. If not for that, I would have no problem taking another life. Even your most basic human right is naught but a social construct. Cannibals do not believe that humans have the right to life. Pro-abortionists do not believe that a potential human is entitled to life at the inconvenience of the mother.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #258,124
@previous (Unintentional Jackass !LASXURl1b6)
Cannibals are an exception for they have mental issues and is a fetus really a human? I always thought it was a developing human that isn't aware of it's existence yet.
Cannibals are an exception for they have mental issues and is a fetus really a human? I always thought it was a developing human that isn't aware of it's existence yet.
Anonymous M joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #258,125
@258,116 (A)
Humans evolved to have an inherent respect for their support communities, but it really doesn't go any further than that. In fact, we have a strong tendency hate communities which challenge us.
Even psychopaths get along with other psychopaths.
Humans evolved to have an inherent respect for their support communities, but it really doesn't go any further than that. In fact, we have a strong tendency hate communities which challenge us.
Even psychopaths get along with other psychopaths.
Unintentional Jackass !LASXURl1b6 replied with this 15 years ago, 8 minutes later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #258,129
@258,124 (A)
No, they do not have mental issues, they have social issues. The child of a cannibal raised in modern society would value human life just as much as any other child. And define self aware. A fetus gains sentience at 24-28 weeks of gestation, but a child can be 2 or 3 years old before they become fully self-aware by any definition, and even then they continue becoming more aware late into their teens.
No, they do not have mental issues, they have social issues. The child of a cannibal raised in modern society would value human life just as much as any other child. And define self aware. A fetus gains sentience at 24-28 weeks of gestation, but a child can be 2 or 3 years old before they become fully self-aware by any definition, and even then they continue becoming more aware late into their teens.