Minichan

Topic: Windows 8 is Vista part deux.

Anonymous A started this discussion 15 years ago #14,186

Just checked it out and SMH. Windows 7 is great, why ruin it so badly for the sake of looks? Most of the changes are things I could get over but why is there such shitty support for multitasking? I feel they're copying the worst aspects of GNOME 3 and iOS at the expense of the best aspects of Windows itself.

I'm starting to think developers aren't qualified to be in charge of designing software anymore.

Seems it's time to switch to ugly XFCE.

Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 28 minutes later[^] [v] #251,967

so don't buy Windows 8, it's not for you.

it's for people who want shiny new touchscreen Windows on a tablet PC.

Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 15 minutes later, 44 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #251,971

@previous (B)
so, windows is coping osx now?
fuck dat shit

dw !AUIkTW/L46 joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 31 seconds later, 44 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #251,972

@previous (C)
osx doesn't even work on touch screens

Anonymous C replied with this 15 years ago, 51 seconds later, 45 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #251,973

@previous (dw !AUIkTW/L46)
dogfarts

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 2 hours later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #252,005

@251,967 (B)
Except people who want tablets buy iPads.

Anonymous B replied with this 15 years ago, 11 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #252,014

@previous (A)
that won't necessarily be the case in a few months time
iPads will be considered like toys compared to the real computers that happen to be 'tablets' or 'slates'

and yes running iOS makes it not a real computer

(Edited 41 seconds later.)

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 2 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #252,015

@previous (B)
Aren't you forgetting MS had their shot at the tablet market 10 years ago and failed big time?

Anonymous B replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #252,017

@previous (A)
aren't you forgetting that the technology just wasn't good enough yet?

the Apple newton and all of the PDAs failed too
past failures mean nothing
in fact MS is in a unique position since they've had that experience and know what not to do

(Edited 3 minutes later.)

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 5 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #252,022

@previous (B)
MS fanboy detected.

Dude, get over it. MS sucks huge donkey cock now. Approximately ZERO top developers are willing to work for them.

(Edited 49 seconds later.)

Anonymous B replied with this 15 years ago, 4 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #252,023

@previous (A)
i'm no fanboy, but i'm not a hater either

MS sucks just as much donkey cock as they ever did
just because you weren't old enough to remember the various debacles and shitstorms doesn't mean MS is any worse now then they used to be

10 years is a long time in technology
the market has changed, the available tech has changed, the design paradigms have changed
just because the tablet market failed to take off once doesn't mean the shift isn't currently happening

(Edited 21 seconds later.)

Anonymous B double-posted this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #252,025

oh and windows 8 looks legit to me btw

there is a nice classic windows desktop underneath the 'live tiles' and 'multi-tasking' BS
you knew that right?

(Edited 23 seconds later.)

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 3 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #252,028

@252,023 (B)
Maybe you're right. I'm not old enough. I had to google Microsoft Bob once to figure out what the hell people were talking about.

Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 1 hour later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #252,070

@252,022 (A)
> Approximately ZERO top developers are willing to work for them.
That sounds like bullshit to me.

floorboard !hbZVTk6JYc joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 11 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #252,077

in the future computer's will only be for stupid people. Think about it, even today the shit is so dumbed down you alm ost have to be an idiot to use it properly.

(Edited 1 minute later.)

Anonymous G joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 1 hour later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #252,164

@previous (floorboard !hbZVTk6JYc)

Maybe browsing Facebook and setting up emails. Most IT is rock-hard for people who aren't trained in it.

Anonymous B replied with this 15 years ago, 1 hour later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #252,228

Image went missing@252,028 (A)
what if Windows 8 is the next Microsoft BoBâ„¢?

or Windows 95â„¢, 98â„¢, 98SEâ„¢, meâ„¢, and XPâ„¢ don't forget people used to hate that one too
"lolol i think the next windows will be <insert windows version here> all over again"

i'm pretty much just glad Windows is a stable OS in 2011 and doesn't bluescreen all over the place

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 1 hour later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #252,259

@252,070 (E)
http://www.cioinsight.com/c/a/IT-Management/Microsofts-Key-Employee-Losses-/
http://www.informationweek.com/news/windows/microsoft_news/229402113

Anonymous A (OP) double-posted this 15 years ago, 26 minutes later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #252,278

@252,228 (B)
I don't know anybody who hated Windows 7.

Triptych !6Suckfishs joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 59 minutes later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #252,289

Skipping every second Windows OS seems to be a good rule of thumb.

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 49 minutes later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #252,293

@previous (Triptych !6Suckfishs)
Hey, that's like Star Trek movies.

Anonymous A (OP) double-posted this 15 years ago, 59 minutes later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #252,311

@previous (A)
*correction. In Star Trek, even numbered movies are legit, odd numbered are weak. Seems to be the opposite in Windows land.

Anonymous I joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 3 minutes later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #252,312

@previous (A)
> implying Nemesis wasn't complete shit.

Triptych !6Suckfishs replied with this 15 years ago, 58 seconds later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #252,313

@252,293 (A)
> that feel when you've never seen a single Star Trek movie

Anonymous J joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 15 seconds later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #252,314

@252,311 (A)
Shut the fuck up man

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 10 hours later, 23 hours after the original post[^] [v] #252,372

@previous (J)
Convention goer detected.
:

Please familiarise yourself with the rules and markup syntax before posting.