Notice: You have been identified as a bot, so no internal UID will be assigned to you. If you are a real person messing with your useragent, you should change it back to something normal.
Anonymous A started this discussion 15 years ago#14,112
Could it be possible that we are reincarnated into our offspring? It would explain the need to procreate. This would mean we were are parents in a previous life.
Ks !KansasxqvM joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 2 minutes later[^][v]#251,202
Genetically speaking, yes. Every one of your ancestors was a successful reproducer, their genes exist in you right now.
Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 3 minutes later, 6 minutes after the original post[^][v]#251,205
@previous (Ks !KansasxqvM)
To get even more weird, they control what you do. Your every move, and your every action. They are the direct cause for all your reasoning and thoughts.
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 13 minutes later, 19 minutes after the original post[^][v]#251,211
@previous (C)
Nah. Their genes will influence your behavior to an extent, but to say that you are just a robot/puppet is going too far.
Anonymous C replied with this 15 years ago, 56 seconds later, 20 minutes after the original post[^][v]#251,212
@previous (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU) > Stop liking what I don't like.
(Edited 21 seconds later.)
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 15 years ago, 4 minutes later, 25 minutes after the original post[^][v]#251,213
Anonymous H joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 46 minutes after the original post[^][v]#251,228
> It would explain the need to procreate.
I'm a little confused about what you mean by this. What do you mean the "need to procreate"?
Ks !KansasxqvM replied with this 15 years ago, 8 minutes later, 55 minutes after the original post[^][v]#251,235
@previous (H)
The goal of every living thing is to procreate. If a person 'decides' not to have kids, they are letting down their ancestors... all those generations of people that it took to create you and you fail to pass on genes, serious fail.
Anonymous H replied with this 15 years ago, 2 minutes later, 57 minutes after the original post[^][v]#251,237
@previous (Ks !KansasxqvM)
Yes, I understand that, but I don't understand how that has anything to do with the possibility we're "reincarnated into our offspring"?
Ks !KansasxqvM replied with this 15 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^][v]#251,240
@previous (H)
Who doesn't want to live forever (genetically speaking)?
Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx replied with this 15 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^][v]#251,241
Anonymous J joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 2 hours later, 3 hours after the original post[^][v]#251,366
@251,235 (Ks !KansasxqvM)
ha, my ancestors were richfags, they probably deserve the letting down.
floorboard !hbZVTk6JYc joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 12 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^][v]#251,373
I sure hope not, my kids are all a bunch of little douche bags. I hope I'm not really them.
Anonymous L joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 2 hours later, 6 hours after the original post[^][v]#251,388
@251,235 (Ks !KansasxqvM)
But to say that those who don't procreate isn't of value to society is absolutely bullshit.
What if that person was a doctor or a fireman or a scientist? They are still contributing to society and humanity at large.
Anonymous I replied with this 15 years ago, 33 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^][v]#251,391
@previous (L)
He can't help it. It's part of his atheistic religion to assume personal beliefs as universal fact. Even the universal goal of every living thing is no problem for the mind-reading skills of the superior atheist intellect.
Just ignore it. It's a shitty materialistic and heterosexist position anyhow.
floorboard !hbZVTk6JYc joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 14 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^][v]#251,393
@previous (I) > It's part of his atheistic religion to assume personal beliefs as universal fact. > religion to assume personal beliefs as universal fact. > religion as universal fact.
hmmm
> It's part of his beliefs to assume religion as universal fact.
There we go, now this statement is actually one that is representative of a broad group.
Anonymous I replied with this 15 years ago, 8 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^][v]#251,396
@previous (floorboard !hbZVTk6JYc)
Missing the point.
Assuming to know the absolute goal of billions of living individuals, not to mention EVERY LIVING THING is arrogant and dumb.
Anonymous N joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 7 hours after the original post[^][v]#251,397
Ks !KansasxqvM replied with this 15 years ago, 15 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^][v]#251,399
@251,388 (L)
I meant in a biological and genetic sense. Certainly people who decide not to have kids can contribute to society, just not their genes. The goal of every living being is to reproduce, humans are the only ones who 'decide' not to.
floorboard !hbZVTk6JYc replied with this 15 years ago, 48 minutes later, 8 hours after the original post[^][v]#251,408
@251,396 (I)
that's right, it's arrogant and dumb.
Anonymous I replied with this 15 years ago, 12 hours later, 20 hours after the original post[^][v]#251,523
@251,399 (Ks !KansasxqvM)
Because humans are smarter than animals.
RaiRai !TrUHMeowzA joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 45 minutes later, 21 hours after the original post[^][v]#251,526
@251,399 (Ks !KansasxqvM)
Yeah humans can decide not to but that's 'cause we know that fucking leads to babies... I wonbder if any other animal knows that. It's not really our goal to reproduce, not like anyone makes the rules it's just the way we've evolved but that's all down to chance and shit, I wouldn't call it a goal
buspuppie !!hkv8K5ZEY joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 6 minutes later, 21 hours after the original post[^][v]#251,528