Topic: Lead is the new miracle drug that will end this statist and immoral decadence.
Anonymous A started this discussion 15 years ago #14,042
Lead and lead chips are a miraculous new way to help increase your devotion to our Lord Jesus Christ.Christian Scientists say that after studying children with a steady diet of lead chips and lead in the drinking water are 85% more devoted to the Lord. [Source: OECD]
The new “Jesus Vitamin†is not something new, but is now being explored as one of the most potentially greatest new tools for helping maintian a healthy connection to the Baby Jesus.
Where can you find lead? Look in most leading christian book stores or call: (208)441-8203
Are moments of rational and logical thought threatening to destroy your faith?
Is clear and lucid thinking leading you astray and doubting Jesus.
Well the only thing that can cure that is either a major head truama or the quick and easy lead chip vitamin. Why suffer through mallet blows or ruin a good car on a telephone pole when you can easily take 1 or 5 lead chips with a glass of water.
Do what 100s of people are doing daily, soften that grey matter and strive towards a better relationship with Jesus.
Enormous effort has been focused over the last decade and a half on characterizing the behavioral effects of lead in the developing organism. While age-appropriate standardized measures of intelligence (IQ) have been the dependent variable most often used to assess lead-induced cognitive impairment in epidemiologic studies, researchers have also used a variety of other methods designed to assess specific behavioral processes sensitive to lead. Increased reaction time and poorer performance on viligance tasks associated with increased lead body burden suggest increased distractibility and short attention span. Assessment of behavior on teachers’ rating scales identified increased distractibility, impulsivity, nonpersistence, inability to follow sequences of directions, and inappropriate approach to problems as hallmarks of lead exposure. Robust deficits in learned skills such as reading, spelling, math, and word recognition have also been found. Spatial organizational perception and abilities seem particularly sensitive to lead-induced impairment. Assessment of complex tasks of learning and memory in both rats and monkeys has revealed overall deficits in function over a variety of behavioral tasks. Exploration of behavioral mechanisms responsible for these deficits identified increased distractibility, perseveration, inability to inhibit inappropriate responding, and inability to change response strategy as underlying deficits. Thus, there is remarkable congruence between the epidemiologic and experimental literatures with regard to the behavioral processes identified as underlying the deficits inflicted by developmental lead exposure. However, careful behavioral analysis was required from researchers in both fields for such understanding to emerge. — Environ Health Perspect 104(Suppl 2):337-351 (1996)
Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 2 minutes later[^] [v] #250,294
> Christian Scientists
This is an actual religion. You probably mean "Christian scientists".
> Are moments of rational and logical thought threatening to destroy your faith?
> Is clear and lucid thinking leading you astray and doubting Jesus.
Actually, fideism has been universally and repeatedly condemned by the Christian Church.
This is an actual religion. You probably mean "Christian scientists".
> Are moments of rational and logical thought threatening to destroy your faith?
> Is clear and lucid thinking leading you astray and doubting Jesus.
Actually, fideism has been universally and repeatedly condemned by the Christian Church.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 3 minutes later, 5 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #250,295
Anonymous B replied with this 15 years ago, 5 minutes later, 10 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #250,296
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 4 minutes later, 14 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #250,297
vocalon !!uCYNn6J67 joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 4 minutes later, 19 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #250,298
@previous (A)
> ask for citation
> denies citations given
It's like you set yourself up to be made fun of.
> ask for citation
> denies citations given
It's like you set yourself up to be made fun of.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 21 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #250,300
@previous (vocalon !!uCYNn6J67)
Please show me more specific citations, otherwise I will assume you are just a bad troll.
Please show me more specific citations, otherwise I will assume you are just a bad troll.
vocalon !!uCYNn6J67 replied with this 15 years ago, 47 seconds later, 21 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #250,302
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 22 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #250,305
@previous (vocalon !!uCYNn6J67)Please leave this thread immediately. I am trying to have a discussion here.
Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 49 seconds later, 23 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #250,306
I lol'd.
vocalon !!uCYNn6J67 replied with this 15 years ago, 19 seconds later, 24 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #250,307
Anonymous B replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 25 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #250,308
@250,297 (A)
> It is not surprising, therefore, that the Church has condemned such doctrines. In 1348, the Holy See proscribed certain fideistic propositions of Nicholas d'Autrecourt (cf. Denzinger, Enchiridion, 10th ed., nn. 553-570). In his two Encyclicals, one of September, 1832, and the other of July, 1834, Gregory XVI condemned the political and philosophical ideas of Lamenais. On 8 September, 1840, Bautain was required to subscribe to several propositions directly opposed to Fideism, the first and the fifth of which read as follows: "Human reason is able to prove with certitude the existence of God; faith, a heavenly gift, is posterior to revelation, and therefore cannot be properly used against the atheist to prove the existence of God"; and "The use of reason precedes faith and, with the help of revelation and grace, leads to it." The same proposition were subscribed to by Bonnetty on 11 June, 1855 (cf. Denzinger, nn. 1650-1652). In his Letter of 11 December, 1862, to the Archbishop of Munich, Pius IX, while condemning Frohschammer's naturalism, affirms the ability of human reason to reach certitude concerning the fundamental truths of the moral and religious order (cf. Denzinger, 1666-1676). And, finally, the Vatican Council teaches as a dogma of Catholic faith that "one true God and Lord can be known with certainty by the natural light of human reason by means of the things that are made" (Const., De Fide Catholicâ", Sess. III, can. i, De Revelatione; cf. Granderath, "Constitutiones dogmaticae Conc. Vatic.", Freiburg, 1892, p. 32 cf. Denzinger, n. 1806).
> It is not surprising, therefore, that the Church has condemned such doctrines. In 1348, the Holy See proscribed certain fideistic propositions of Nicholas d'Autrecourt (cf. Denzinger, Enchiridion, 10th ed., nn. 553-570). In his two Encyclicals, one of September, 1832, and the other of July, 1834, Gregory XVI condemned the political and philosophical ideas of Lamenais. On 8 September, 1840, Bautain was required to subscribe to several propositions directly opposed to Fideism, the first and the fifth of which read as follows: "Human reason is able to prove with certitude the existence of God; faith, a heavenly gift, is posterior to revelation, and therefore cannot be properly used against the atheist to prove the existence of God"; and "The use of reason precedes faith and, with the help of revelation and grace, leads to it." The same proposition were subscribed to by Bonnetty on 11 June, 1855 (cf. Denzinger, nn. 1650-1652). In his Letter of 11 December, 1862, to the Archbishop of Munich, Pius IX, while condemning Frohschammer's naturalism, affirms the ability of human reason to reach certitude concerning the fundamental truths of the moral and religious order (cf. Denzinger, 1666-1676). And, finally, the Vatican Council teaches as a dogma of Catholic faith that "one true God and Lord can be known with certainty by the natural light of human reason by means of the things that are made" (Const., De Fide Catholicâ", Sess. III, can. i, De Revelatione; cf. Granderath, "Constitutiones dogmaticae Conc. Vatic.", Freiburg, 1892, p. 32 cf. Denzinger, n. 1806).
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 51 seconds later, 26 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #250,309
@previous (B)
Please stay on topic. That has nothing to do with ending current, modern day statism and creating a closer relationship with God.
Please stay on topic. That has nothing to do with ending current, modern day statism and creating a closer relationship with God.
Anonymous B replied with this 15 years ago, 11 minutes later, 37 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #250,317
@previous (A)
> Are moments of rational and logical thought threatening to destroy your faith?
> Is clear and lucid thinking leading you astray and doubting Jesus.
These statements are opposed to Christian doctrine.
> Are moments of rational and logical thought threatening to destroy your faith?
> Is clear and lucid thinking leading you astray and doubting Jesus.
These statements are opposed to Christian doctrine.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 4 minutes later, 42 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #250,323
Anonymous B replied with this 15 years ago, 3 hours later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #250,380
@previous (A)
Christian doctrine teaches that God can be reached through reason alone.
Doctrine can be, and often is dogma.
Christian doctrine teaches that God can be reached through reason alone.
Doctrine can be, and often is dogma.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #250,381
@previous (B)
But it isn't. You are just grasping at straws which is not exclusive to all denominations of faith. Why should I believe your version of Christianity? Don't be such an exclusivist troll.
But it isn't. You are just grasping at straws which is not exclusive to all denominations of faith. Why should I believe your version of Christianity? Don't be such an exclusivist troll.
Anonymous B replied with this 15 years ago, 3 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #250,383
@previous (A)
> But it isn't. You are just grasping at straws which is not exclusive to all denominations of faith. Why should I believe your version of Christianity? Don't be such an exclusivist troll.
Please rephrase in Standard English.
> But it isn't. You are just grasping at straws which is not exclusive to all denominations of faith. Why should I believe your version of Christianity? Don't be such an exclusivist troll.
Please rephrase in Standard English.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #250,385
@previous (B)
Are you retarded? lol
Doctrine is exclusive to certain denominations of faith. It's not Christian dogma. Lrn2denominations.
Are you retarded? lol
Doctrine is exclusive to certain denominations of faith. It's not Christian dogma. Lrn2denominations.
!JuMPb0dbaE joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 2 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #250,387
@250,294 (B)
> Actually, fideism has been universally and repeatedly condemned by the Christian Church.
yes, because it is perfectly natural for men to rise from the dead after 3 days.
also, believing in something without any proof is reasonable.
> Actually, fideism has been universally and repeatedly condemned by the Christian Church.
yes, because it is perfectly natural for men to rise from the dead after 3 days.
also, believing in something without any proof is reasonable.
Anonymous B replied with this 15 years ago, 55 seconds later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #250,388
@250,385 (A)
Certain heretical, non-orthodox denominations believe a variety of insane, illogical doctrines. This is none of my concern. I am defending Christianity, not you cult which calls itself Christian.
Certain heretical, non-orthodox denominations believe a variety of insane, illogical doctrines. This is none of my concern. I am defending Christianity, not you cult which calls itself Christian.
Anonymous B double-posted this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #250,389
@250,387 (!JuMPb0dbaE)
> thinks logical and likely mean the same thing
oh jump you make me laugh. seriously its like waterboy debating the professor.
> thinks logical and likely mean the same thing
oh jump you make me laugh. seriously its like waterboy debating the professor.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 2 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #250,391
@250,388 (B)
That doesn't even make sense. Are you trolling? Not all of Christianity believes your absurd doctrines. They are not universal truths, just the backwards beliefs of a few odd believers. How do you not grasp this?
That doesn't even make sense. Are you trolling? Not all of Christianity believes your absurd doctrines. They are not universal truths, just the backwards beliefs of a few odd believers. How do you not grasp this?
Anonymous B replied with this 15 years ago, 4 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #250,393
@previous (A)
The majority of Christianity (the Roman Catholic Church, and Mainline Protestant denominations) believe as I do.
The majority of Christianity (the Roman Catholic Church, and Mainline Protestant denominations) believe as I do.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #250,394
@previous (B)
And you are which denomination? Not everyone agrees with you. Christ might not agree with you, so stop talking as if he does.
And you are which denomination? Not everyone agrees with you. Christ might not agree with you, so stop talking as if he does.
Anonymous B replied with this 15 years ago, 14 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #250,395
@previous (A)
It matters not which denomination I am; I am objectively stating the beliefs of the Roman Catholic Church and the Mainline Protestant churches. I did not claim everyone agrees with me - I readily acknowledge that heretics disagree with me.
It matters not which denomination I am; I am objectively stating the beliefs of the Roman Catholic Church and the Mainline Protestant churches. I did not claim everyone agrees with me - I readily acknowledge that heretics disagree with me.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 26 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #250,396
@previous (B)
> that heretics disagree with me.
Obviously you are biased. Thus your opinion is null and void. You can quit anytime now, troll.
> that heretics disagree with me.
Obviously you are biased. Thus your opinion is null and void. You can quit anytime now, troll.