Minichan

Topic: Give money to science, not the poor.

boop !Bz2S2BFeXI started this discussion 15 years ago #13,963

Image went missingThe thing sitting in front of you already proves humans are capable of reaching levels of sophistication similar to that of nature, it is not much of a logical leap to suggest that we will at one point be able to design organisms then incorporate other technology to create new forms of life, consciousness life with intelligence and abilities far beyond our own.

If good means what is good for conscious beings then it makes sense to replace humanity with this new form of conscious life, this way there will be no more 6 year olds dying of typhoid fever in the slums of Dhaka, neither will there be 80 year olds dying of old age because they will not have telomeres and programmed cell death, with this in mind it is far more ethical to use your charity money to invest in a biomed company. The only ethical reason to give to the poor would be if it ultimately aids technological development, for instance testing everyone in Dhaka for signs of gifted intelligence then promptly scooping up all their geniuses, educating them and setting them to work in R&D, anything else is just a waste of resources that could be better used elsewhere.
Poll option Votes Percentage Graph
the logical conclusion 5 42%
archaic moralism 7 58%

Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later[^] [v] #249,196

Quite logical, Captain.

Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 3 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #249,198

Externally hosted imageI bet you wouldn't say that if you were poor.

Falco !PZmcClOUDk joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 4 minutes later, 8 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #249,199

donate the poor to science.

Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 5 minutes later, 13 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #249,200

@previous (Falco !PZmcClOUDk)
Best thing I have heard said on here in a long time.

Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 28 seconds later, 14 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #249,201

When did consciousness become some higher purpose? Most of don't even seem to enjoy it very much. When did it start sounding like a good idea to go around inflicting it on otherwise inanimate matter?

Anonymous G joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 1 hour later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #249,231

Do both

!JuMPb0dbaE joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 2 hours later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #249,274

If your goal is to stop suffering, it is far better served giving to scientific research.

People prefer to alleviate immediate suffering, just as we will take immediate gains regardless of the long term consequences.

Anonymous I joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 3 hours later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #249,297

Give money to science in order to help the poor.

dw !AUIkTW/L46 joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 6 hours later, 15 hours after the original post[^] [v] #249,414

@249,198 (C)

> I bet you wouldn't say that if you were poor.

buspuppie !!hkv8K5ZEY joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 15 hours after the original post[^] [v] #249,416

@previous (dw !AUIkTW/L46)
pardon?

dw !AUIkTW/L46 replied with this 15 years ago, 5 minutes later, 15 hours after the original post[^] [v] #249,419

@previous (buspuppie !!hkv8K5ZEY)
what

buspuppie !!hkv8K5ZEY replied with this 15 years ago, 7 minutes later, 15 hours after the original post[^] [v] #249,422

@previous (dw !AUIkTW/L46)
what did you mean?

Anonymous L joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 1 hour later, 16 hours after the original post[^] [v] #249,450

I support feeding all the world's nigglets. Not because I give a fuck, but because it enrages holier than thou atheists and environmentalists.

buspuppie !!hkv8K5ZEY replied with this 15 years ago, 3 minutes later, 16 hours after the original post[^] [v] #249,454

@previous (L)
Since when are atheists against feeding hungry people?

Anonymous L replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 16 hours after the original post[^] [v] #249,456

@previous (buspuppie !!hkv8K5ZEY)
Okay, they're not. They just bitch about overpopulation incessantly.

Anonymous I replied with this 15 years ago, 51 minutes later, 17 hours after the original post[^] [v] #249,461

@249,450 (L)
> it enrages holier than thou atheists and environmentalists.
No it doesn't.

dw !AUIkTW/L46 replied with this 15 years ago, 17 minutes later, 17 hours after the original post[^] [v] #249,464

@249,422 (buspuppie !!hkv8K5ZEY)
I agreed with him
:

Please familiarise yourself with the rules and markup syntax before posting.