Topic: Anthropic IPO valuation went from 2TN to 1.5TN to 1TN
Anonymous A started this discussion 5 hours ago #139,161
I’m not sure I have an opinion on this, but it is interesting not too long ago Anthropic was saying they’d have a 2 trillion dollar valuation after their IPO. Then they changed it to 1.5 trillion… but now after the midterms it’s 1 trillion.
What do you think about that?
What do you think about that?
Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 5 hours ago, 16 minutes later[^] [v] #1,470,890
2T is beyond ridiculous based on revenue. Fantasy football “future valuation.” The S-1 had 93 pages of risk factors, a novella 2x-3x most companies.
At this point it’s hostage taking: “Give us what we demand or we will crash GDP, the stock market, and the private credit markets. All of your workflows are belong to us.”
At this point it’s hostage taking: “Give us what we demand or we will crash GDP, the stock market, and the private credit markets. All of your workflows are belong to us.”
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 5 hours ago, 1 minute later, 18 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,470,891
@previous (B)
> 2T is beyond ridiculous based on revenue. Fantasy football “future valuation.” The S-1 had 93 pages of risk factors, a novella 2x-3x most companies.
Ngl, I know this is a tech company, but even for a San Francisco based tech company listing "AI could end humanity" as a risk factor in their IPO just shows they’re massive nerds. And not in a fun way.
> 2T is beyond ridiculous based on revenue. Fantasy football “future valuation.” The S-1 had 93 pages of risk factors, a novella 2x-3x most companies.
Ngl, I know this is a tech company, but even for a San Francisco based tech company listing "AI could end humanity" as a risk factor in their IPO just shows they’re massive nerds. And not in a fun way.
Anonymous A (OP) double-posted this 5 hours ago, 1 minute later, 19 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,470,895
But anyway, that’s beside the point. The point is, I don’t know what I should think about this. I just don’t know anymore. The billionaires have gotten wackier and wackier and now we’re at a point where I have no thoughts.
Anonymous B replied with this 5 hours ago, 13 seconds later, 20 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,470,896
@1,470,891 (A)
> > 2T is beyond ridiculous based on revenue. Fantasy football “future valuation.” The S-1 had 93 pages of risk factors, a novella 2x-3x most companies.
>
> Ngl, I know this is a tech company, but even for a San Francisco based tech company listing "AI could end humanity" as a risk factor in their IPO just shows they’re massive nerds. And not in a fun way.
Imagine a biotech startup: “Our new elixir can cure common diseases and possibly cancer in future iterations. Unsubstantiated versions could go airborne. If you have the following conditions, 60%-80% of you are likely to die.”
> > 2T is beyond ridiculous based on revenue. Fantasy football “future valuation.” The S-1 had 93 pages of risk factors, a novella 2x-3x most companies.
>
> Ngl, I know this is a tech company, but even for a San Francisco based tech company listing "AI could end humanity" as a risk factor in their IPO just shows they’re massive nerds. And not in a fun way.
Imagine a biotech startup: “Our new elixir can cure common diseases and possibly cancer in future iterations. Unsubstantiated versions could go airborne. If you have the following conditions, 60%-80% of you are likely to die.”
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 5 hours ago, 1 minute later, 21 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,470,897
@previous (B)
Yeah it’s like, I don’t believe them when they say that, but at the same time, I almost feel like they deserve to fail for having the audacity to say that.
Yeah it’s like, I don’t believe them when they say that, but at the same time, I almost feel like they deserve to fail for having the audacity to say that.
Anonymous A (OP) double-posted this 5 hours ago, 1 minute later, 23 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,470,899
The tech is real, LLMs can do stuff, that’s true. They can certainly do things, useful things even, and there’s value in that. But the stuff that comes out their mouth just sounds like something a scammer would say. Idk, it’s like theranos or something.
Anonymous A (OP) triple-posted this 5 hours ago, 2 minutes later, 25 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,470,900
Maybe it will go to the moon. Probably, idk, I’m not gonna invest in it.
Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 4 hours ago, 37 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,470,904
boof joined in and replied with this 3 hours ago, 1 hour later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,470,937
these fucking companies for whatever reason are run by naked fascists who need to go fuck themselves
Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 2 hours ago, 1 hour later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,470,954
@previous (boof)
Tbh I don’t feel any particular way about LLMs, but the more I hear from these AI CEOs the more I hate them. They tell such obvious lies all the time and try to fear monger because they want more money.
Tbh I don’t feel any particular way about LLMs, but the more I hear from these AI CEOs the more I hate them. They tell such obvious lies all the time and try to fear monger because they want more money.
Anonymous E double-posted this 1 hour ago, 5 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,470,955
It’s also obvious that they don’t want democracy.