Topic: The future of America (according to the right)
Anonymous A started this discussion 6 days ago #138,961
In 2050, America will be a nation of whites only, everyone will have lots of kids. Out of the 500 million Americans, the 250 million women will be stay at home moms with no jobs, 250 million men will all be plumbers and electricians who didn’t go to college, and AI will automate every job except for plumbers and electricians. There will be no government workers, the president will be a healthy, strong 104 year old Donald Trump, China will be a republican democracy, Canada will be a US state, but they’ll all vote red for some reason. And Berlin will have a beautiful Soviet flag flying over the Reichstag because Europeans are fake and gay so they need communism. But we don’t need communism, we need to keep that shit out of America. But Europe will be 100% controlled by Russia.
Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 6 days ago, 2 minutes later[^] [v] #1,469,409
i needz fucked :)
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 6 days ago, 1 minute later, 3 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,469,410
Sir Carves-A-Lot !nFL78DnUTg joined in and replied with this 6 days ago, 1 minute later, 4 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,469,411
We ate Toby Carvery don't know about that, but what we can say is that the future will include our delicious Yorkshire puddings!Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 5 days ago, 15 hours later, 15 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,469,537
Do you really think there’s an end state other than feelings and “owning the libs” by destroying legal and governance norms to lard the pockets of tech and crypto bros?
Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 5 days ago, 22 minutes later, 16 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,469,544
Dumb
Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 5 days ago, 1 hour later, 17 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,469,557
@1,469,537 (D)
That is the end game in itself. The right doesn't offer practical things, they never claimed to. What the right offer is a sense of moral superiority. Their voters want to feel superior to blacks and gay people and immigrants and whatever else it is. Most rightist voters will freely admit that they want leaders who will spend time on issues like trans people in bathrooms or deporting overly brown people.
That is the end game in itself. The right doesn't offer practical things, they never claimed to. What the right offer is a sense of moral superiority. Their voters want to feel superior to blacks and gay people and immigrants and whatever else it is. Most rightist voters will freely admit that they want leaders who will spend time on issues like trans people in bathrooms or deporting overly brown people.
Anonymous G joined in and replied with this 5 days ago, 1 hour later, 18 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,469,576
@previous (F)
Ngl when I see comments on the internet from right wingers sometimes I wonder if they’re even real people. Like these people actually celebrate the idea that AI will automate away all knowledge work and that college degrees will be pointless because they actually want a world where we have 340 million plumbers and 2 trillionaires. I feel like they have to be bots from AI companies or something, there’s no way anybody’s actually that cucked by capitalism that they want to be poor and have no chance at ever earning wealth.
Ngl when I see comments on the internet from right wingers sometimes I wonder if they’re even real people. Like these people actually celebrate the idea that AI will automate away all knowledge work and that college degrees will be pointless because they actually want a world where we have 340 million plumbers and 2 trillionaires. I feel like they have to be bots from AI companies or something, there’s no way anybody’s actually that cucked by capitalism that they want to be poor and have no chance at ever earning wealth.
Anonymous G double-posted this 5 days ago, 3 minutes later, 18 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,469,578
Or when they actually unironically celebrate unelected billionaires having political influence because they think it’s an own to socialists or something stupid. I’m not saying we need socialism, but these people don’t want to live in a democracy, they want to live in a feudalist oligarchy and they literally want to be peasants with no freedom.
Anonymous H joined in and replied with this 5 days ago, 42 minutes later, 19 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,469,585
Anonymous I joined in and replied with this 4 days ago, 18 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,469,707
@1,469,578 (G)
> Or when they actually unironically celebrate unelected billionaires having political influence because they think it’s an own to socialists or something stupid. I’m not saying we need socialism, but these people don’t want to live in a democracy, they want to live in a feudalist oligarchy and they literally want to be peasants with no freedom.
For some people, freedom means removing the anxiety of choice and telling them what to do.
> Or when they actually unironically celebrate unelected billionaires having political influence because they think it’s an own to socialists or something stupid. I’m not saying we need socialism, but these people don’t want to live in a democracy, they want to live in a feudalist oligarchy and they literally want to be peasants with no freedom.
For some people, freedom means removing the anxiety of choice and telling them what to do.
Anonymous I double-posted this 4 days ago, 5 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,469,709
@previous (I)
> > Or when they actually unironically celebrate unelected billionaires having political influence because they think it’s an own to socialists or something stupid. I’m not saying we need socialism, but these people don’t want to live in a democracy, they want to live in a feudalist oligarchy and they literally want to be peasants with no freedom.
>
> For some people, freedom means removing the anxiety of choice and someone telling them what to do.
> > Or when they actually unironically celebrate unelected billionaires having political influence because they think it’s an own to socialists or something stupid. I’m not saying we need socialism, but these people don’t want to live in a democracy, they want to live in a feudalist oligarchy and they literally want to be peasants with no freedom.
>
> For some people, freedom means removing the anxiety of choice and someone telling them what to do.
Anonymous J joined in and replied with this 11 hours ago, 4 days later, 5 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,470,814
Anonymous K joined in and replied with this 10 hours ago, 54 minutes later, 5 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,470,828
@1,469,707 (I)
> For some people, freedom means removing the anxiety of choice and telling them what to do.
Billionaires / trillionaires definitely increase my anxiety so I find it hard to relate to their mindset.
> For some people, freedom means removing the anxiety of choice and telling them what to do.
Billionaires / trillionaires definitely increase my anxiety so I find it hard to relate to their mindset.