Topic: Which LLM do you use, fora?
Anonymous A started this discussion 2 weeks ago #138,678
And do you use Cursor or Claude Code or any other tools?
Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 2 weeks ago, 3 minutes later[^] [v] #1,466,433
I don't really use AI but I did fuck around with Gemini for a few minutes one time so that I guess. I can't imagine paying for something so shitty. People who have AI subscriptions are cucks
Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 2 weeks ago, 3 hours later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,466,456
@previous (B)
Im a cuck. I use Claude. I use it to randomly generate practice quizzes and flashcards for import onto Anki.
Saves me a lot of time building flash cards and I can adjust the difficulty for my mock exams. So far it’s been helpful in my studies. If im confused on a topic or idea I ask for clarification.
Personally never used it for social stuff but I know people that use it to have “someone” to talk to. Cant say I blame them. Forums and to a certain extent people are trash to talk to online and IRL.
Im a cuck. I use Claude. I use it to randomly generate practice quizzes and flashcards for import onto Anki.
Saves me a lot of time building flash cards and I can adjust the difficulty for my mock exams. So far it’s been helpful in my studies. If im confused on a topic or idea I ask for clarification.
Personally never used it for social stuff but I know people that use it to have “someone” to talk to. Cant say I blame them. Forums and to a certain extent people are trash to talk to online and IRL.
Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 2 weeks ago, 21 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,466,459
@previous (C)> Personally never used it for social stuff but I know people that use it to have “someone” to talk to. Cant say I blame them. Forums and to a certain extent people are trash to talk to online and IRL.
It's only the people who use it in lieu of human friendships or begin to consider it an actual "friend" that I think have a problem. Using it for general chatting or advice isn't necessarily bad. But considering LLMs adopt the behaviours, opinions, biases, and stylistic tendencies etc. present in their training data, and one of the main sources of training data for LLMs is Reddit... I wouldn't be in a hurry to use it for dating or life advice without outside input, lol.
Anonymous D double-posted this 2 weeks ago, 1 minute later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,466,460
@OP
I use ChatGPT for personal shit and Claude Code with Opus 5.5 for work. Thanks.
I use ChatGPT for personal shit and Claude Code with Opus 5.5 for work. Thanks.
Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 2 weeks ago, 6 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,466,463
@1,466,459 (D)
In all honesty LLMs has been very helpful. I can ask it questions or have it ELI5. Very simple layman’s terms. Very supplemental in my learning endeavors.
I like it as a tool. No different than using a dictionary or a manual of sorts.
In all honesty LLMs has been very helpful. I can ask it questions or have it ELI5. Very simple layman’s terms. Very supplemental in my learning endeavors.
I like it as a tool. No different than using a dictionary or a manual of sorts.
Anonymous D replied with this 2 weeks ago, 5 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,466,468
@previous (E)
Same pretty much. Modern models are pretty trustworthy and far less prone to hallucinating, although I do check their output when it matters. I've finally been able to understand certain concepts I could never have understood (or that would've taken ages) pre-LLM, weird as that sounds to say. I get the hate for AI when it's misused or replacing humans' jobs in certain contexts, but for me LLMs have been great.
Same pretty much. Modern models are pretty trustworthy and far less prone to hallucinating, although I do check their output when it matters. I've finally been able to understand certain concepts I could never have understood (or that would've taken ages) pre-LLM, weird as that sounds to say. I get the hate for AI when it's misused or replacing humans' jobs in certain contexts, but for me LLMs have been great.
(Edited 20 seconds later.)
Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 2 weeks ago, 33 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,466,471
Live&Lemon joined in and replied with this 2 weeks ago, 1 hour later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,466,486
@1,466,459 (D)
LLMs aren’t people and I’ll never talk to it like it’s a person. Tech companies aren’t your friend, never ever think that they are.
LLMs aren’t people and I’ll never talk to it like it’s a person. Tech companies aren’t your friend, never ever think that they are.
Live&Lemon double-posted this 2 weeks ago, 3 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,466,487
All I’m saying, is if you wouldn’t write it down in an email and send it directly to the government with your full legal name, you probably shouldn’t say it to an online chatbot, because in terms of access, they would be legally required to hand over the chat logs.
Anonymous B replied with this 2 weeks ago, 29 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,466,499
Live&Lemon joined in and replied with this 2 weeks ago, 28 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,466,509
@previous (B)
I’ve heard Anthropic has good models, but I find it annoying to listen to their CEO, because if you look at his past, clearly he’s a smart guy, but the stuff that comes out of his mouth are things that somebody as smart as he is shouldn’t say. Like "we don’t know if the models are conscious" or worrying about the emotional wellbeing of the models when they don’t have emotions, aren’t conscious, and have no internal experience. The only way I can make it make sense is he thinks we’re stupid. And I don’t like that.
I’ve heard Anthropic has good models, but I find it annoying to listen to their CEO, because if you look at his past, clearly he’s a smart guy, but the stuff that comes out of his mouth are things that somebody as smart as he is shouldn’t say. Like "we don’t know if the models are conscious" or worrying about the emotional wellbeing of the models when they don’t have emotions, aren’t conscious, and have no internal experience. The only way I can make it make sense is he thinks we’re stupid. And I don’t like that.
Live&Lemon double-posted this 2 weeks ago, 54 seconds later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,466,510
Either that or he’s just high on his own supply, which is entirely possible.
Meta joined in and replied with this 2 weeks ago, 1 hour later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,466,544
Never use them. I have Natural Intelligence.
Anonymous J joined in and replied with this 2 weeks ago, 11 minutes later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,466,549
Take a guessAnonymous K joined in and replied with this 2 weeks ago, 1 hour later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,466,571
Calling them "LLMs" when they can analyze images and video streams, have voice chats, convert files, fill and excel sheet, calculate, write programs, and a lot more doesn't really fit.
LLMs are just one (important) part of the whole AI.
LLMs are just one (important) part of the whole AI.
Live&Lemon joined in and replied with this 2 weeks ago, 8 minutes later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,466,573
Anonymous K replied with this 2 weeks ago, 1 minute later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,466,575
Live&Lemon replied with this 2 weeks ago, 51 seconds later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,466,576
I find it confusing that you’re presenting older forms of machine learning as if they’re newer than LLMs. Convolutional neural networks were analyzing images and video before LLMs and speech to text models existed before LLMs. Those features are older than LLMs not newer than LLMs.
Live&Lemon double-posted this 2 weeks ago, 1 minute later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,466,577
I also don’t understand the thing about writing programs. LLMs output tokens, they’re language models. Programming languages are languages. LLMs could always output code if they were trained on code, that’s not a fundamental leap in how they work underneath.
Anonymous K replied with this 2 weeks ago, 22 seconds later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,466,578
@1,466,576 (Live&Lemon)
> I find it confusing that you’re presenting older forms of machine learning as if they’re newer than LLMs.
I never said they were newer, you made that up to avoid addressing what I actually said.
Why is it so hard for you to stop and ask yourself "did he actually say that" first?
> I find it confusing that you’re presenting older forms of machine learning as if they’re newer than LLMs.
I never said they were newer, you made that up to avoid addressing what I actually said.
Why is it so hard for you to stop and ask yourself "did he actually say that" first?
Live&Lemon replied with this 2 weeks ago, 37 seconds later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,466,579
Anonymous K replied with this 2 weeks ago, 1 minute later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,466,580
@1,466,577 (Live&Lemon)
The difference is the interpreter is present too, and that's not an LLM.
The LLM passes code to the interpreter, and that can do many things the LLM can't.
There were a lot of people mocking these services for being bad at math after they already had interpreters built in too to handle that, and that's what I mean.
The difference is the interpreter is present too, and that's not an LLM.
The LLM passes code to the interpreter, and that can do many things the LLM can't.
There were a lot of people mocking these services for being bad at math after they already had interpreters built in too to handle that, and that's what I mean.
Anonymous K double-posted this 2 weeks ago, 1 minute later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,466,581
@1,466,579 (Live&Lemon)
Pointing out that you are strawmanning isn't being adversarial.
If it annoys you stop making up fake things to respond to. No one is obligated to play along with your strawman just because it annoys you when it's pointed out.
Pointing out that you are strawmanning isn't being adversarial.
If it annoys you stop making up fake things to respond to. No one is obligated to play along with your strawman just because it annoys you when it's pointed out.
Live&Lemon replied with this 2 weeks ago, 1 minute later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,466,582
@1,466,580 (K)
So, I think everyone is aware that you can connect LLMs to other things, but Anthropic and OpenAI are LLM companies. The innovation that they’re selling isn’t convolutional neural networks or interpreters or speech to text or text to speech, it’s LLMs.
So, I think everyone is aware that you can connect LLMs to other things, but Anthropic and OpenAI are LLM companies. The innovation that they’re selling isn’t convolutional neural networks or interpreters or speech to text or text to speech, it’s LLMs.
Live&Lemon double-posted this 2 weeks ago, 2 minutes later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,466,583
If you look at the core of OpenAI’s or Athropic’s business model, the thing they’re selling is access to their LLMs. Anyone can easily do speech to text and text to speech that’s already built into every web browser for free and has been for years. They’re not selling convolutional neural networks, you can train one yourself on your own computer, they’re selling LLMs.
Anonymous K replied with this 2 weeks ago, 10 seconds later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,466,584
@1,466,582 (Live&Lemon)
It's part of their main product, and they advertise those features.
Being able to speak to it in real time, ask it about a live camera feed, or generate files is no less a part of it than the LLM.
It's part of their main product, and they advertise those features.
Being able to speak to it in real time, ask it about a live camera feed, or generate files is no less a part of it than the LLM.
Live&Lemon replied with this 2 weeks ago, 42 seconds later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,466,585
@previous (K)
It’s not part of their main product, it’s what 100% of their business depends on. You can take out any other component and they still have a business, the LLM is the center of every product they have.
It’s not part of their main product, it’s what 100% of their business depends on. You can take out any other component and they still have a business, the LLM is the center of every product they have.
Anonymous K replied with this 2 weeks ago, 31 seconds later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,466,587
@1,466,583 (Live&Lemon)
Web browsers don't have real-time conversations, and I can't chat with it about something through my camera.
Web browsers don't have real-time conversations, and I can't chat with it about something through my camera.
Live&Lemon replied with this 2 weeks ago, 59 seconds later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,466,588
@previous (K)
Correct, that’s what I’m saying. There’s only one thing that differentiates OpenAI and Anthropic from what you can do yourself on your own hardware.
Correct, that’s what I’m saying. There’s only one thing that differentiates OpenAI and Anthropic from what you can do yourself on your own hardware.
Live&Lemon double-posted this 2 weeks ago, 16 seconds later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,466,589
It’s the LLM and nothing but the LLM.
Anonymous K replied with this 2 weeks ago, 30 seconds later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,466,590
@1,466,585 (Live&Lemon)
People would still use image generation, real time voice, and the ability to convert different file types.
You can take an image and turn it into a 3d asset, or have it make graphs from an Excel doc.
People would use those still, even if plain text chats are the most popular.
People would still use image generation, real time voice, and the ability to convert different file types.
You can take an image and turn it into a 3d asset, or have it make graphs from an Excel doc.
People would use those still, even if plain text chats are the most popular.
Live&Lemon replied with this 2 weeks ago, 34 seconds later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,466,591
@previous (K)
No they wouldn’t. You can do all of that on your own hardware already and you’ve been able to do all those things for the past 15 years.
No they wouldn’t. You can do all of that on your own hardware already and you’ve been able to do all those things for the past 15 years.
Anonymous K replied with this 2 weeks ago, 49 seconds later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,466,592
@1,466,588 (Live&Lemon)
Realtime duplex calls don't rely on LLMs necessarily, and image generation isn't really "LLM" even though language tokens are involved.
Realtime duplex calls don't rely on LLMs necessarily, and image generation isn't really "LLM" even though language tokens are involved.
Live&Lemon replied with this 2 weeks ago, 4 seconds later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,466,593
They only have one product: the LLM. Everything else is stuff you can do without OpenAI or Anthropic.
Anonymous K replied with this 2 weeks ago, 1 minute later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,466,594
Live&Lemon replied with this 2 weeks ago, 53 seconds later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,466,595
Anonymous K replied with this 2 weeks ago, 24 seconds later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,466,596
@1,466,593 (Live&Lemon)
They have their own image generation models, and they do a lot more than diffusion now to make the image.
They have their own image generation models, and they do a lot more than diffusion now to make the image.
(Edited 1 minute later.)
Anonymous K double-posted this 2 weeks ago, 1 minute later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,466,597
@1,466,595 (Live&Lemon)
What else could it mean besides chatting with the AI in real time?
Not pressing the TTS button and then pressing the "read this" option, but pressing a button once, setting the phone down, and having a call for 30 mins without another button press.
What else could it mean besides chatting with the AI in real time?
Not pressing the TTS button and then pressing the "read this" option, but pressing a button once, setting the phone down, and having a call for 30 mins without another button press.
Live&Lemon replied with this 2 weeks ago, 14 seconds later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,466,598
@1,466,596 (K)
Let’s just focus on one thing at a time. Explain what you mean by real time voice calls.
Let’s just focus on one thing at a time. Explain what you mean by real time voice calls.
Live&Lemon double-posted this 2 weeks ago, 52 seconds later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,466,599
Live&Lemon triple-posted this 2 weeks ago, 54 seconds later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,466,600
You can use a speech to text model to convert audio into text and you can use a text to speech model to convert text into audio. In the 2010s Siri could already do that. The only difference is now there’s an LLM mixed in so it gives better responses.
Live&Lemon quadruple-posted this 2 weeks ago, 1 minute later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,466,601
The question of whether OpenAI And Anthropic survive is a question of whether or not the frontier AI models are economically viable, because if they aren’t, they have no moat and LLMs will become a commodity.
Live&Lemon quintuple-posted this 2 weeks ago, 9 minutes later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,466,604
And by the way, that is a question I cannot answer for several reasons:
1. There is not enough transparency about how much these companies are really spending the only source is the companies themselves and they have very little regulatory control and very little incentive to tell the truth if the truth isn’t overwhelmingly positive
2. These companies make up non-standard accounting metrics
3. The cost of a frontier AI model today is not the same as the cost of the next generation of frontier AI models and I can’t extrapolate that because I don’t even know how expensive the current generation is
1. There is not enough transparency about how much these companies are really spending the only source is the companies themselves and they have very little regulatory control and very little incentive to tell the truth if the truth isn’t overwhelmingly positive
2. These companies make up non-standard accounting metrics
3. The cost of a frontier AI model today is not the same as the cost of the next generation of frontier AI models and I can’t extrapolate that because I don’t even know how expensive the current generation is
Live&Lemon sextuple-posted this 2 weeks ago, 2 minutes later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,466,605
I also did try asking AI and it doesn’t know either.
Anonymous K replied with this 2 weeks ago, 5 minutes later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,466,606
Anonymous K double-posted this 2 weeks ago, 21 seconds later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,466,607
Live&Lemon replied with this 2 weeks ago, 2 minutes later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,466,608
The majority of OpenAI’s an Anthropic’s revenue isn’t coming from image generation. They’re LLM companies. You can deny it all you want, but it is what it is. They have one product.
Anonymous B replied with this 2 weeks ago, 1 second later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,466,609
Bro is really trying to argue with lemonfag. Just ignore him, he just argues to argue. That's why he spams 300 word essays instead of keeping his arguments to the point. He's a shitposter.
Live&Lemon replied with this 2 weeks ago, 34 seconds later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,466,610
You don’t even use AI though.
@1,466,433 (B)
> I don't really use AI but I did fuck around with Gemini for a few minutes one time so that I guess. I can't imagine paying for something so shitty. People who have AI subscriptions are cucks
@1,466,433 (B)
> I don't really use AI but I did fuck around with Gemini for a few minutes one time so that I guess. I can't imagine paying for something so shitty. People who have AI subscriptions are cucks
Live&Lemon double-posted this 2 weeks ago, 1 minute later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,466,611
If anything your opinion is closer to mine than the other guy, you think people who have AI subscriptions are cucks and anon K buys into all the Anthropic and OpenAI marketing about super intelligence.
Anonymous B replied with this 2 weeks ago, 25 seconds later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,466,612
now he's trying to rope me into his argument LMAOOOO
Anonymous K replied with this 2 weeks ago, 0 seconds later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,466,613
@1,466,610 (Live&Lemon)
You aren't making any sense, he didn't offer an opinion on how AI works, what's this cite like you found a contradiction?
@1,466,609 (B)
No.
You aren't making any sense, he didn't offer an opinion on how AI works, what's this cite like you found a contradiction?
@1,466,609 (B)
No.
(Edited 42 seconds later.)
Live&Lemon replied with this 2 weeks ago, 37 seconds later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,466,614
@1,466,612 (B)
> now he's trying to rope me into his argument LMAOOOO
No I think you literally forgot what you wrote.
> now he's trying to rope me into his argument LMAOOOO
No I think you literally forgot what you wrote.
Anonymous K replied with this 2 weeks ago, 15 seconds later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,466,615
Anonymous K double-posted this 2 weeks ago, 22 seconds later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,466,616
Live&Lemon replied with this 2 weeks ago, 18 seconds later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,466,617
@1,466,615 (K)
I just did quote it but I’ll quote it a second time.
He wrote this:
@1,466,433 (B)
> I don't really use AI but I did fuck around with Gemini for a few minutes one time so that I guess. I can't imagine paying for something so shitty. People who have AI subscriptions are cucks
I just did quote it but I’ll quote it a second time.
He wrote this:
@1,466,433 (B)
> I don't really use AI but I did fuck around with Gemini for a few minutes one time so that I guess. I can't imagine paying for something so shitty. People who have AI subscriptions are cucks
Live&Lemon double-posted this 2 weeks ago, 15 seconds later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,466,618
Anon k, does that sound more like me or you?
Anonymous B replied with this 2 weeks ago, 5 seconds later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,466,619
He's going nuclear LMAOOOOOOOOOOOOO
Anonymous K replied with this 2 weeks ago, 11 seconds later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,466,620
Anonymous K double-posted this 2 weeks ago, 24 seconds later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,466,621
Live&Lemon replied with this 2 weeks ago, 35 seconds later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,466,622
@1,466,620 (K)
Because he’s trying to troll by saying you shouldn’t argue with me even though he posted something that suggests his opinion is much closer to my opinion than your opinion.
Because he’s trying to troll by saying you shouldn’t argue with me even though he posted something that suggests his opinion is much closer to my opinion than your opinion.
Live&Lemon double-posted this 2 weeks ago, 30 seconds later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,466,623
@1,466,621 (K)
Yeah, that’s what I’m saying. What he’s doing doesn’t make any sense, it’s like he forgot what he wrote.
Yeah, that’s what I’m saying. What he’s doing doesn’t make any sense, it’s like he forgot what he wrote.
Anonymous B replied with this 2 weeks ago, 9 seconds later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,466,624
OH NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO LEMONBROS WE GOT TOO COCKY! AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
Live&Lemon double-posted this 2 weeks ago, 45 seconds later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,466,625
@previous (B)
NOOOOOOO STOP IT STOP IT TAKE ME SERIOUSLY MY OPINIONS HAVE MERIT! I HAVE VALUE AS A PERSON! NOOOOOOOOOO
NOOOOOOO STOP IT STOP IT TAKE ME SERIOUSLY MY OPINIONS HAVE MERIT! I HAVE VALUE AS A PERSON! NOOOOOOOOOO
Anonymous K replied with this 2 weeks ago, 13 seconds later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,466,626
@1,466,622 (Live&Lemon)
Conclusion and process are different, I tried explaining that to you a lot in the past.
Conclusion and process are different, I tried explaining that to you a lot in the past.
Anonymous B replied with this 2 weeks ago, 17 seconds later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,466,627
Live&Lemon replied with this 2 weeks ago, 6 seconds later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,466,628
Anonymous K replied with this 2 weeks ago, 8 seconds later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,466,629
@1,466,623 (Live&Lemon)
No, his conclusion is like yours, but he probably recognizes the incoherent process you have to thinking.
No, his conclusion is like yours, but he probably recognizes the incoherent process you have to thinking.
Live&Lemon replied with this 2 weeks ago, 18 seconds later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,466,630
Anonymous K replied with this 2 weeks ago, 25 seconds later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,466,631
@1,466,628 (Live&Lemon)
Maybe his process is the same but he has less of a compulsion to argue.
I don't see any certain contradictions.
Maybe his process is the same but he has less of a compulsion to argue.
I don't see any certain contradictions.
Live&Lemon replied with this 2 weeks ago, 16 seconds later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,466,633
Anonymous K replied with this 2 weeks ago, 53 seconds later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,466,637
@previous (Live&Lemon)
Because he thinks arguing is pointless.
Doesn't mean he can't understanding how you form a coherant thought.
Cynicism isn't a synonym with idiocy.
Because he thinks arguing is pointless.
Doesn't mean he can't understanding how you form a coherant thought.
Cynicism isn't a synonym with idiocy.
Live&Lemon replied with this 2 weeks ago, 21 seconds later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,466,638
Live&Lemon replied with this 2 weeks ago, 12 seconds later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,466,639
Toby carvery in me tum and a right hard cock in me bum!
Anonymous K replied with this 2 weeks ago, 21 seconds later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,466,640
Live&Lemon replied with this 2 weeks ago, 45 seconds later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,466,641
@previous (K)
So how come you have a problem with it when I say arguing is pointless but you don’t have a problem with this other guy? It seems like you’re willing to tolerate things from other people you don’t tolerate from me.
So how come you have a problem with it when I say arguing is pointless but you don’t have a problem with this other guy? It seems like you’re willing to tolerate things from other people you don’t tolerate from me.
Live&Lemon double-posted this 2 weeks ago, 37 seconds later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,466,642
I know the answer to that question by the way. You told me a long time ago you’re a racist so I already know why you always disagree with me, it’s an ego thing for you.
Live&Lemon replied with this 2 weeks ago, 2 seconds later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,466,643
I feel really unheard and unseen right now
ugh
ugh
Anonymous K replied with this 2 weeks ago, 29 seconds later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,466,644
Live&Lemon replied with this 2 weeks ago, 23 seconds later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,466,645
Live&Lemon replied with this 2 weeks ago, 25 seconds later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,466,646
I'm getting angry...you won't like me when I'm angry...
Anonymous K replied with this 2 weeks ago, 25 seconds later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,466,647
@1,466,642 (Live&Lemon)
I've met black people I like, and you're not even a full black.
I dislike you because you don't care about truth, and you want to corrupt minichan with liberal misinformation.
I've met black people I like, and you're not even a full black.
I dislike you because you don't care about truth, and you want to corrupt minichan with liberal misinformation.
Live&Lemon replied with this 2 weeks ago, 29 seconds later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,466,648
I'm actually half Jewish
Live&Lemon double-posted this 2 weeks ago, 16 seconds later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,466,649
and a homosexual
Anonymous K replied with this 2 weeks ago, 11 seconds later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,466,650
@1,466,645 (Live&Lemon)
You just asked why I wouldn't, now you're asking why I would?
So you're just changing your stance to whatever is against me? lol
You just asked why I wouldn't, now you're asking why I would?
So you're just changing your stance to whatever is against me? lol
Live&Lemon replied with this 2 weeks ago, 3 seconds later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,466,651
Anonymous K replied with this 2 weeks ago, 1 minute later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,466,652
@previous (Live&Lemon)
No, I dislike you because you use dishonest tricks and repeat information you know is debunked.
No, I dislike you because you use dishonest tricks and repeat information you know is debunked.
Live&Lemon replied with this 2 weeks ago, 1 second later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,466,653
I’m not going to let anyone control my thoughts. If you don’t like that I think for myself, then fuck you.
Live&Lemon replied with this 2 weeks ago, 16 seconds later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,466,654
I'm a virgin
Live&Lemon double-posted this 2 weeks ago, 24 seconds later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,466,655
and a homosexual
Live&Lemon replied with this 2 weeks ago, 2 seconds later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,466,656
Live&Lemon replied with this 2 weeks ago, 48 seconds later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,466,657
Live&Lemon double-posted this 2 weeks ago, 33 seconds later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,466,658
also I'm a homosexual
Live&Lemon replied with this 2 weeks ago, 42 seconds later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,466,659
Anonymous K replied with this 2 weeks ago, 5 seconds later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,466,660
@1,466,653 (Live&Lemon)
This is what I mean.
You knowingly lie and frame being called out as "controlling your thoughts".
You make up a strawman earlier and call me "adversarial" when I don't play along.
This is what I mean.
You knowingly lie and frame being called out as "controlling your thoughts".
You make up a strawman earlier and call me "adversarial" when I don't play along.
Live&Lemon replied with this 2 weeks ago, 17 seconds later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,466,661
Live&Lemon replied with this 2 weeks ago, 29 seconds later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,466,662
Live&Lemon replied with this 2 weeks ago, 18 seconds later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,466,663
@1,466,660 (K)
You're trying to get me to agree with your right wing thoughts. I'm a free man and can get fucked in the ass if I want.
You're trying to get me to agree with your right wing thoughts. I'm a free man and can get fucked in the ass if I want.
Live&Lemon double-posted this 2 weeks ago, 26 seconds later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,466,664
on account of the fact I'm a homosexual you see
Live&Lemon replied with this 2 weeks ago, 4 seconds later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,466,665
I don’t care what excuse you make, the reason why you don’t like me is because you hate freedom of thought. I think things that you don’t like and you don’t want to let me speak my mind about it. That’s what you said.
Live&Lemon replied with this 2 weeks ago, 1 minute later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,466,666
I should be free to think about getting gangbanged by 20 guys.
Anonymous K replied with this 2 weeks ago, 11 seconds later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,466,667
@1,466,662 (Live&Lemon)
No I didn't I said I don't like you for spreading liberal lies.
You've got a simplistic worldview and strawman some other shit in.
No I didn't I said I don't like you for spreading liberal lies.
You've got a simplistic worldview and strawman some other shit in.
Live&Lemon replied with this 2 weeks ago, 6 seconds later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,466,668
because I'm really gay like unbelievably gay holy shit I'm gay
Live&Lemon double-posted this 2 weeks ago, 37 seconds later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,466,669
Live&Lemon triple-posted this 2 weeks ago, 24 seconds later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,466,670
...because I'm gay
Live&Lemon replied with this 2 weeks ago, 36 seconds later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,466,671
@1,466,667 (K)
> No I didn't I said I don't like you for spreading liberal lies.
Who tf determines what a lie is?
> No I didn't I said I don't like you for spreading liberal lies.
Who tf determines what a lie is?
Live&Lemon replied with this 2 weeks ago, 52 seconds later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,466,672
I love My Little Pony
Konuwanu joined in and replied with this 2 weeks ago, 37 seconds later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,466,673
Chat GPE from Avibagla.
Okay but for real, i use duck.ai
Okay but for real, i use duck.ai
Live&Lemon replied with this 2 weeks ago, 31 seconds later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,466,675
Anonymous K replied with this 2 weeks ago, 6 minutes later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,466,677
@1,466,671 (Live&Lemon)
This right here is what turned your mind to goop.
Do you think water use in a chemistry lab is subjective? No? Then why would it be when comparing Indians vs AI?
This right here is what turned your mind to goop.
Do you think water use in a chemistry lab is subjective? No? Then why would it be when comparing Indians vs AI?
(Edited 2 minutes later.)
Live&Lemon replied with this 2 weeks ago, 18 minutes later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,466,687
Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc joined in and replied with this 2 weeks ago, 20 minutes later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,466,706
Mr. Bloody Lemonade 0JqexkOGBc replied with this 2 weeks ago, 1 minute later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,466,708
...and because I'm gay
Anonymous K replied with this 2 weeks ago, 1 minute later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,466,709
Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc replied with this 2 weeks ago, 1 minute later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,466,710
@previous (K)
Fine. I give up. You are correct. Trump is actually Indian and actually Indian is going to take over the world because actually Indian is smarter than you.
Fine. I give up. You are correct. Trump is actually Indian and actually Indian is going to take over the world because actually Indian is smarter than you.
Mr. Bloody Lemonade 0JqexkOGBc replied with this 2 weeks ago, 29 seconds later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,466,711
and I'm gay
Anonymous O joined in and replied with this 2 weeks ago, 4 days later, 4 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,468,220
Switched from ChatGPT to Claude lately.
Getting much better results for scripting and assessing my writing. ChatGPT is great for quick shit I don't really care about.
Getting much better results for scripting and assessing my writing. ChatGPT is great for quick shit I don't really care about.
Anonymous Q joined in and replied with this 2 weeks ago, 22 hours later, 5 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,468,481
SeedanceText-to-video model developed by ByteDance
Green !pDif3ODBl. joined in and replied with this 2 weeks ago, 8 hours later, 6 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,468,510
Cleverbot.
Killer Lettuce🌹 !HonkUK.BIE joined in and replied with this 2 weeks ago, 2 minutes later, 6 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,468,511
Anonymous T joined in and replied with this 2 weeks ago, 5 hours later, 6 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,468,603
@previous (Killer Lettuce🌹 !HonkUK.BIE)
They never took it down
https://www.cleverbot.com/
Also zombocom got a revamp
https://zombo.com/
They never took it down
https://www.cleverbot.com/
Also zombocom got a revamp
https://zombo.com/