Topic: Goo goo gaga baba mama mama
Anonymous A started this discussion 3 hours ago #138,618
Igu papa ubi dubi abba AAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHH WAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHH WAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH...WAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH
Sir Carves-A-Lot !nFL78DnUTg joined in and replied with this 2 hours ago, 5 minutes later[^] [v] #1,465,769
Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 1 hour ago, 1 hour later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,465,795
So I could see the other argument here: I’m presenting from a presentation, I want to switch to a live demo environment, and to do so I need to turn off the presentation entirely?
Now, another operating system might see this tension and say: why not have a UI element come up, and ask the user whether they want to share their entire screen or stay on the existing shared window?
Here, I think this hits a fundamental weakness in Apple’s design culture: if you want to make things magical by removing options from users, occasionally you’re going to hit something that’s impossible to do without giving the user control. And if anything, Apple’s culture has been overtuned towards not providing that control, if at all possible.
Nobody wants complexity for complexity’s sake, but this is the type of thing that should have come up in a meeting, and someone didn’t feel empowered to bring it up.
Now, another operating system might see this tension and say: why not have a UI element come up, and ask the user whether they want to share their entire screen or stay on the existing shared window?
Here, I think this hits a fundamental weakness in Apple’s design culture: if you want to make things magical by removing options from users, occasionally you’re going to hit something that’s impossible to do without giving the user control. And if anything, Apple’s culture has been overtuned towards not providing that control, if at all possible.
Nobody wants complexity for complexity’s sake, but this is the type of thing that should have come up in a meeting, and someone didn’t feel empowered to bring it up.