Topic: Virginity: From Blessing to Curse
Anonymous A started this discussion 15 years ago #13,852
Did anyone else notice how when religion was in primary control of the world, virginity was a blessing one can have, but now that atheism is on the rise, virginity is a curse and a subject to ridicule?
floorboard !hbZVTk6JYc joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later[^] [v] #247,334
Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #247,335
Lol OP has never gotten laid, lol
buspuppie !!hkv8K5ZEY joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 38 seconds later, 3 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #247,336
When has male virginity ever been a blessing?
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 27 minutes later, 31 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #247,345
lol @OP's never been laid lol
Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 6 minutes later, 37 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #247,349
vocalon joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 3 minutes later, 41 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #247,350
lol @OP's never been laid lol
buspuppie !!hkv8K5ZEY replied with this 15 years ago, 5 minutes later, 46 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #247,351
Anonymous F replied with this 15 years ago, 23 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #247,353
@previous (buspuppie !!hkv8K5ZEY)
> prohibited by inspired Scripture (Bible, Quran)
> prohibited by ecclesiastical law (canon, monastic rules, shariah)
> prohibited by civil law throughout history, still illegal in 13 nations
> Men have always been allowed to have sex.
whatever, troll.
> prohibited by inspired Scripture (Bible, Quran)
> prohibited by ecclesiastical law (canon, monastic rules, shariah)
> prohibited by civil law throughout history, still illegal in 13 nations
> Men have always been allowed to have sex.
whatever, troll.
buspuppie !!hkv8K5ZEY replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #247,355
Anonymous F replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #247,357
@previous (buspuppie !!hkv8K5ZEY)
> Men have always been allowed to have murder. No matter what religious texts have said.
We know this because nothing has prevented men from murdering.
> Men have always been allowed to have murder. No matter what religious texts have said.
We know this because nothing has prevented men from murdering.
sluggy joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 6 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #247,360
The Romans were pretty religious.
Their gods were cool with all the fucking. In fact, legend has it, the roman gods would take the form of humans and fuck like crazy, especially the head god.
Their gods were cool with all the fucking. In fact, legend has it, the roman gods would take the form of humans and fuck like crazy, especially the head god.
Anonymous F replied with this 15 years ago, 19 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #247,366
buspuppie !!hkv8K5ZEY replied with this 15 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #247,370
floorboard !hbZVTk6JYc joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 5 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #247,371
I don't think at any period of time people respected 40 year old virgins. Even back in the day people were getting it on younger because life expectancy was low. They only worried about the virginity of the young, still, after a certain point, it would have been ridiculed.
Like an old maid.
Like an old maid.
buspuppie !!hkv8K5ZEY replied with this 15 years ago, 45 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #247,372
Anonymous F replied with this 15 years ago, 14 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #247,383
Handel !khEOdtKF56 joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 7 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #247,388
I still respect virgins, it takes a lot of willpower to say no to acting promiscuous.
buspuppie !!hkv8K5ZEY replied with this 15 years ago, 6 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #247,390
@247,383 (F)
What? Nothing has prevented people from murdering or fucking. Not religion or anything else.
What? Nothing has prevented people from murdering or fucking. Not religion or anything else.
Anonymous F replied with this 15 years ago, 22 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #247,403
@247,371 (floorboard !hbZVTk6JYc)
> no sources, just unqualified, ignorant opinion
Thanks for your contribution.
> no sources, just unqualified, ignorant opinion
Thanks for your contribution.
Anonymous F double-posted this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #247,406
@247,390 (buspuppie !!hkv8K5ZEY)
So you agree with the following statements?
> When has life ever been a blessing?
> Men have always been allowed to murder. No matter what religious texts have said.
So you agree with the following statements?
> When has life ever been a blessing?
> Men have always been allowed to murder. No matter what religious texts have said.
buspuppie !!hkv8K5ZEY replied with this 15 years ago, 9 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #247,417
@previous (F)
Not life you idiot. When is virginity a blessing. It's not.
@OP
> Did anyone else notice how when religion was in primary control of the world, virginity was a blessing one can have, but now that atheism is on the rise, virginity is a curse and a subject to ridicule?
Not life you idiot. When is virginity a blessing. It's not.
@OP
> Did anyone else notice how when religion was in primary control of the world, virginity was a blessing one can have, but now that atheism is on the rise, virginity is a curse and a subject to ridicule?
floorboard !hbZVTk6JYc replied with this 15 years ago, 8 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #247,423
@247,403 (F)
The fuck? You think I'm going to do fucking research to argue with some bullshit OP pulled out of his ass? Fuck off, he provided nothing along the lines of sources or qualified opinion. If this is a fucking debate club then ask OP why he seems to think that religion is not in primary control of the world right fucking now.
The fuck? You think I'm going to do fucking research to argue with some bullshit OP pulled out of his ass? Fuck off, he provided nothing along the lines of sources or qualified opinion. If this is a fucking debate club then ask OP why he seems to think that religion is not in primary control of the world right fucking now.
(Edited 42 seconds later.)
Anonymous K joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 2 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #247,426
@247,390 (buspuppie !!hkv8K5ZEY)
Yes it has, at least for some people. The very devout would not have been promiscuous or murderous, while without adherence to their faith they might have been. It has had that sort of influence over some people.
Yes it has, at least for some people. The very devout would not have been promiscuous or murderous, while without adherence to their faith they might have been. It has had that sort of influence over some people.
Anonymous F replied with this 15 years ago, 4 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #247,432
@247,417 (buspuppie !!hkv8K5ZEY)
Do you not see how those statements are entirely analagous? Please explain why you accept that statement for sex but not for murder.
Do you not see how those statements are entirely analagous? Please explain why you accept that statement for sex but not for murder.
Anonymous F double-posted this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #247,434
@247,423 (floorboard !hbZVTk6JYc)
> The fuck? You think I'm going to do fucking research to argue with some bullshit OP pulled out of his ass? Fuck off, he provided nothing along the lines of sources or qualified opinion.
> prohibited by inspired Scripture (Bible, Quran)
> prohibited by ecclesiastical law (canon, monastic rules, shariah)
> prohibited by civil law throughout history, still illegal in 13 nations
If you're going to argue at all, do research.
> If this is a fucking debate club then ask OP why he seems to think that religion is not in primary control of the world right fucking now.
Irrelevant to the discussion. Start your own topic if you'd like to discuss that.
> The fuck? You think I'm going to do fucking research to argue with some bullshit OP pulled out of his ass? Fuck off, he provided nothing along the lines of sources or qualified opinion.
> prohibited by inspired Scripture (Bible, Quran)
> prohibited by ecclesiastical law (canon, monastic rules, shariah)
> prohibited by civil law throughout history, still illegal in 13 nations
If you're going to argue at all, do research.
> If this is a fucking debate club then ask OP why he seems to think that religion is not in primary control of the world right fucking now.
Irrelevant to the discussion. Start your own topic if you'd like to discuss that.
buspuppie !!hkv8K5ZEY replied with this 15 years ago, 2 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #247,438
floorboard !hbZVTk6JYc replied with this 15 years ago, 2 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #247,439
@247,434 (F)
but if religion is still in primary control of the world (which it is) then his argument is invalid from the get-go, and arguing about an invalid argument it is just silly.
but if religion is still in primary control of the world (which it is) then his argument is invalid from the get-go, and arguing about an invalid argument it is just silly.
(Edited 30 seconds later.)
buspuppie !!hkv8K5ZEY replied with this 15 years ago, 32 seconds later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #247,440
Anonymous F replied with this 15 years ago, 38 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #247,460
@247,439 (floorboard !hbZVTk6JYc)
He did not explicitly state that Religion is no longer in primary control of the world.
He did not explicitly state that Religion is no longer in primary control of the world.
Anonymous F double-posted this 15 years ago, 2 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #247,462
@247,438 (buspuppie !!hkv8K5ZEY)
You argue that men are allowed to have sex, despite a multitude of religious and civil prohibitions, because men have sex.
I argue that men are allowed to murder, despite a multitude of religious and civil prohibitions, because men murder.
My argument is stupid and should be rejected - your argument is stupid and should be rejected.
You argue that men are allowed to have sex, despite a multitude of religious and civil prohibitions, because men have sex.
I argue that men are allowed to murder, despite a multitude of religious and civil prohibitions, because men murder.
My argument is stupid and should be rejected - your argument is stupid and should be rejected.
buspuppie !!hkv8K5ZEY replied with this 15 years ago, 5 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #247,464
@previous (F)
You make no sense. Seriously. Can someone else explain this to me? People are allowed to murder. Laws don't stop murder.
You make no sense. Seriously. Can someone else explain this to me? People are allowed to murder. Laws don't stop murder.
(Edited 50 seconds later.)
Anonymous F replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #247,465
buspuppie !!hkv8K5ZEY replied with this 15 years ago, 2 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #247,468
Fox !FXYGNx1XR. joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 9 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #247,472
Virgin 4 lyfe