Killer Lettuce🌹 !HonkUK.BIE joined in and replied with this 2 weeks ago, 1 hour later, 1 hour after the original post[^][v]#1,461,777
There actually are legitimate reasons why people would want to live next to a volcano. The soil is generally very fertile, valuable minerals, and these days probably lots of tourism revenue. All good reasons for a thriving town or city to spring up somewhere.
Also, while I'm not an expert on this, I think that usually if a volcano is being actively monitored there is some advance warning if it erupts, so there's time to evacuate. And it's not like eruptions are that common, generally. Generations can pass without any eruptions.
> There actually are legitimate reasons why people would want to live next to a volcano. The soil is generally very fertile, valuable minerals, and these days probably lots of tourism revenue. All good reasons for a thriving town or city to spring up somewhere. > > Also, while I'm not an expert on this, I think that usually if a volcano is being actively monitored there is some advance warning if it erupts, so there's time to evacuate. And it's not like eruptions are that common, generally. Generations can pass without any eruptions.
Seismic sensors, GPS depressions, thermal monitoring, satellite monitoring and global watch stations. A surprise eruption would be almost unheard of because of the forces generated and all of the seismic and heat signals.
Killer Lettuce🌹 !HonkUK.BIE replied with this 2 weeks ago, 4 hours later, 13 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,461,858
@previous (Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc)
Yeah, I too had sort of assumed that they all died, but I saw a video recently explaining that that actually wasn't the case.
Modern scholars believe that the majority of people in both cities actually survived, and had ample time to evacuate. What's interesting is that Pliny the Younger says that the people actually basically ignored the earthquakes that happened a few days prior to the eruption, as earthquakes were common in the area. They only realised something was seriously wrong when the volcano started to emit smoke and pumice began to fall. At this point, Pompeii had about 17 hours to evacuate, Herculaneum about 12. And people did evacuate. We even hear in the textual and archeological record of refugees resettling in other cities, and prominent families continuing on elsewhere.
I actually don't disagree with you that living next to a volcano is quite terrifying, but my point is that even two ancient cities like those were able to come out of it fairly well, even after explicitly ignoring the earliest signs. So I am assuming that this modern-day African city would do even better than the Romans.
Killer Lettuce🌹 !HonkUK.BIE replied with this 2 weeks ago, 2 hours later, 16 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,461,880
@previous (E)
I view it the other way around. The 9/11 was absolutely a false flag attack. They are just hiding the WTC with holograms, it's been still going all this time.
The moon landing is legit though. They want to colonise the moon and mine it, so there is economic incentive to go there.
Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc double-posted this 2 weeks ago, 1 minute later, 19 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,461,884
The moon has some rare forms of hydrogen that would be useful in a nuclear fusion reactor… if we invented those yet. There are experiments but they all lose energy.