Notice: Welcome to Minichan, an account has automatically been created and assigned to you, you don't have to register or log in to use the board, but don't clear your cookies unless you have set a memorable name and password. Alternatively, you can restore your ID.
Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc (OP) quadruple-posted this 1 week ago, 1 minute later, 4 minutes after the original post[^][v]#1,461,416
It’s even more cringe because this dude is talking about Japan but he’s Chinese. There are so many layers to this cringe, this is a thick suffocating cringe.
Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 1 week ago, 3 minutes later, 8 minutes after the original post[^][v]#1,461,417
@1,461,415 (Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc)
I'm pretty sure he was just trying to pander to Nick Fuentes by appealing to his white supremacist views (for obvious financial reasons I mean Nick is a fairly big name online and they did agree to do content together later which means more eyes and more money) but he is asian so some of that "white is right" mentality that permeates many third world cultures could definitely be playing a role here.
Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc (OP) replied with this 1 week ago, 3 minutes later, 12 minutes after the original post[^][v]#1,461,418
@previous (B)
Idk, he’s Chinese though. Japan did some stuff to China, using the Japanese as an example of how Asians are superior is kinda fucked up, ngl. Like yeah, some Chinese people are racist, but this is kinda worse.
Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc (OP) triple-posted this 1 week ago, 2 minutes later, 15 minutes after the original post[^][v]#1,461,420
It’s like, it’s one thing if a Polish guy is like, "black people are dirty, I’m white and I’m superior." It’s another thing if a Polish guy walked up to an Asian dude and was like, "Germans are so clean and Germans hate blacks, German women are pretty, you should get a German wife." That’s like a whole different level of self hatred.
Anonymous B replied with this 1 week ago, 2 minutes later, 19 minutes after the original post[^][v]#1,461,422
@1,461,418 (Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc)
I'm not even sure what you're getting at here but Jiang isn't shy about his preference for Japanese society over Chinese society. He literally ranted for a good while recently about how he's so much happier being in Canada for the time being recently because China has smog, everyone is rude, etc etc
Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc (OP) replied with this 1 week ago, 3 minutes later, 23 minutes after the original post[^][v]#1,461,423
@previous (B)
He’s Chinese though. That’s self hating. Your opinion or my opinion about China is different because we aren’t Chinese. You get what I’m saying? He’s Chinese, he should prefer Chinese culture.
Anonymous B replied with this 1 week ago, 1 minute later, 26 minutes after the original post[^][v]#1,461,425
@1,461,423 (Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc)
I mean I don't even know what to say to you that's just a really retarded statement. He doesn't like people being rude and trying to cheat you all the time. It's really that simple.
Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc (OP) double-posted this 1 week ago, 2 minutes later, 30 minutes after the original post[^][v]#1,461,427
I mean, think about this for a second: if somebody white person said what Jiang said, but he said it about white culture, would you have a problem with it?
Anonymous B replied with this 1 week ago, 21 seconds later, 30 minutes after the original post[^][v]#1,461,428
@1,461,426 (Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc)
Have you lived in China? Because I'm going to trust the opinion of a man who has lived in China over yours. Obviously not every chinese person is like that but it's a stereotype for a reason. In fact lol I literally just watched a video essay on this phenomenon by an Asian creator so even Asians agree the Chinese are rude for several reasons
Anonymous B replied with this 1 week ago, 2 minutes later, 33 minutes after the original post[^][v]#1,461,431
@previous (Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc)
There is no logical flaw and your obsession with race is ironic as fuck given how often you post about your grievances with racism. He's complaining about Chinese culture not the race of people. The rudeness is a byproduct of the Cultural Revolution in China among other things
Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc (OP) replied with this 1 week ago, 6 seconds later, 33 minutes after the original post[^][v]#1,461,432
Maybe if you trust a Chinese guy who says you can’t trust Chinese people, that might imply that whether or not you can trust a Chinese person depends on… wait for it… their individual character as a human being. Wow, that’s crazy. That’s how all types of people from all countries work.
Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc (OP) double-posted this 1 week ago, 1 minute later, 34 minutes after the original post[^][v]#1,461,433
@1,461,431 (B)
Would the cultural revolution have ever happened if it wasn’t for Japan’s actions in World War Two that led to a communist victory in the Chinese civil war? Like, that doesn’t make Japan an innocent country with no flaws.
Anonymous B replied with this 1 week ago, 2 minutes later, 37 minutes after the original post[^][v]#1,461,434
@1,461,432 (Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc)
God you're dense. Jiang is a flawed man but I do find it funny how consistently his detractors use the laziest arguments to shit on him. Like there are genuinely things you could attack him for like the fact he has beaten his young son (he's admitted to this) and yet people focus on meme shit like whatever the hell you're talking about
Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc (OP) replied with this 1 week ago, 1 minute later, 39 minutes after the original post[^][v]#1,461,435
@previous (B)
Well look at what the fuck he said. Why do you think I wouldn’t like him. If he said something that insane maybe people should stop listening to him.
Anonymous B replied with this 1 week ago, 3 minutes later, 42 minutes after the original post[^][v]#1,461,436
@previous (Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc)
Oh please he's said plenty of wacky shit which is the primary reason he was dismissed immediately by lots of people but the simple fact is of all the talking heads online (tucker carlson, hassan, candace owens, joe rogan, nick fuentes, will sexton, etc) Jiang is ironically the closest to the truth about what's going on in the world. Now I don't think he's right about everything and he's not perfect but it's undeniable that he predicted trump would get a second term, trump would then go to war with iran in his second term, and that war would go poorly. In hindsight you can probably say that stuff was obvious but I didn't see anyone else making these predictions. So for now I'll continue listening to the man who's been correct so far
Anonymous B replied with this 1 week ago, 2 minutes later, 48 minutes after the original post[^][v]#1,461,438
@previous (Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc)
Okay and it's a 12% chance he'd be right about all 3. He does make big leaps in logic at times but he also does a fuck ton of research. He's constantly referencing books, articles, speeches, religious literature, etc so it's not coming entirely out of nowhere.
Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc replied with this 1 week ago, 1 minute later, 50 minutes after the original post[^][v]#1,461,439
@previous (B)
If there are 8 billion people on the planet, what’s the chance I’d be born in a country of 300 million people that just happens to have the highest GDP?
Anonymous B replied with this 1 week ago, 1 minute later, 53 minutes after the original post[^][v]#1,461,443
> relatively rare thing happened so um actually your history of correct predictions means nothing
This is the level of brain damage we have to deal with on minichan
The more events you string together you get an exponentially smaller number, but that doesn’t actually mean the thing you’re describing is more rare. You could string together random things like what are the odds you’re an American, what are the odds that you’re male, what are the odds you were born in the month you were born, etc. and make it seem like your existence is a crazy chance that should have never happened.
Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc double-posted this 1 week ago, 5 minutes later, 59 minutes after the original post[^][v]#1,461,445
Another odd thing about probability is that, for instance, if you have a list of all integers and you pick a number at random, and it’s 6, that’s possible. But the probability that you would draw a 6 is zero. So things with a probability of zero are not inherently impossible in specific circumstances.
Anonymous B replied with this 1 week ago, 31 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^][v]#1,461,447
@1,461,444 (Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc)
Lol he's still going you can't make this shit up. I'm not even going to point out the flaws in your use of probability theory because it's just a waste of energy. It's genuinely remarkable how confident you are in your own ineptitude. As far as I can glean you seemingly work or are in school planning to work in IT which is a horrifying thought. You in charge of anything critical is a disaster waiting to happen
Anonymous B replied with this 1 week ago, 2 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^][v]#1,461,449
@previous (Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc)
Hah nice try but I'm not playing your game. Probability theory is actually one of the few things I'm familiar with as I studied it quite a bit when I was younger. Anyway, I'm done giving you attention so by all means continue entertaining yourself.
Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 1 week ago, 10 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^][v]#1,461,457
It’s also weird in terms of power dynamics, it’s like he wants acceptance from the Japanese, even though China is vastly more powerful than Japan these days in terms of economic and military strength.
Anonymous E replied with this 1 week ago, 1 minute later, 3 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,461,480
@previous (Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc)
Instead of resenting people who are accomplished and famous, work on yourself. You could get a teaching license if you learned to apply yourself.
Anonymous E replied with this 1 week ago, 27 seconds later, 3 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,461,483
@1,461,481 (Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc)
No, the actual disagreement was whether race should be a factor in admissions. You said yes, I said no, you called me a racist.
Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc triple-posted this 1 week ago, 1 minute later, 3 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,461,493
You said that you don’t like that Harvard uses race in admissions, I said I’m fine with it. If you’re a racist and you also believe that private universities should be allowed to use race in admissions, then shouldn’t Harvard be allowed to use race in admissions?
Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc replied with this 1 week ago, 26 seconds later, 3 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,461,496
@1,461,494 (E)
You changed the goalpost, first you said that it’s okay if private universities use race in admissions, now you’re saying that the government should try to pressure private colleges to not use race in admissions. Why do you think that the government should interfere with the decisions of private organizations?
Anonymous E replied with this 1 week ago, 1 minute later, 3 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,461,498
@1,461,496 (Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc)
No, the goalpost was always that public money shouldn't be factored on race.
An actual private group can do what they want. But once you start looking for government grants you need to be following basic standards, or it will delegitimize the government.
Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc replied with this 1 week ago, 33 seconds later, 3 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,461,499
Isn’t it inherently totalitarian if the government thinks that it has the authority to pressure private institutions to ideologically align with a racial agenda? Surely, it would be better if the government stood for freedom of expression and let private universities do whatever they want.
Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc replied with this 1 week ago, 58 seconds later, 3 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,461,501
@previous (E)
Well isn’t it discriminatory to not factor in race? If you don’t factor in race, some racial groups will be underrepresented because of systematic racism and those groups will be excluded from university. If you do consider race then nobody is excluded.
Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc replied with this 1 week ago, 38 seconds later, 3 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,461,503
In fact, isn’t that the reason why you don’t want race to be considered? You don’t believe that we are all equal but you want to treat everyone as if we are equal, because you want to keep certain undesirable groups from establishing control. And I don’t appreciate that you think I’m not intelligent enough to see through that.
Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc replied with this 1 week ago, 39 seconds later, 3 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,461,505
@previous (E)
You know it does, that’s why you hold this opinion. You want to pretend that something is equal when you assert that you believe we are not equal, that is evil.
Anonymous E replied with this 1 week ago, 40 seconds later, 3 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,461,506
@1,461,503 (Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc)
That doesn't sound like a very good plan, why leave it open? There are black people that passed with the same standards applied and did well.
Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc replied with this 1 week ago, 1 minute later, 3 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,461,507
Really, if you want to get serious, I know what this is actually about, this is about power. I act in my own self interest, and it is in my own self interest to gain the means to protect myself from people like you who don’t have my best interests at heart, which is why we will never see eye to eye on this subject. But I would respect you more if you would be honest with me about your true intentions, because I already know what you feel in your heart.
Anonymous E replied with this 1 week ago, 1 minute later, 3 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,461,508
@1,461,505 (Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc)
There are poor minorities that worked hard and succeeded.
Any meaningful standard would be based on actions. I don't ask for special handicaps or priveleges, you do. All anyone can do to show they play fair is to say they'll accept an equal standard.
Reparations for generation after generation isn't equality, it's a shakedown.
Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc replied with this 1 week ago, 37 seconds later, 3 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,461,509
@previous (E)
I’m not a Protestant, don’t talk to me about work ethic like hard work for the sake of hard work is a value. I want results. I don’t care how they’re achieved.
Anonymous E replied with this 1 week ago, 1 minute later, 3 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,461,510
@1,461,507 (Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc)
Funny how so many "racists" stay in character, even voting to keep race blind tests regardless of how it turns out.
A nazi society that never gives whites a leg up to maintain a cultivated image? 🤔
> I’m not a Protestant, don’t talk to me about work ethic like hard work for the sake of hard work is a value. I want results. I don’t care how they’re achieved.
Anonymous E replied with this 1 week ago, 1 minute later, 3 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,461,519
@previous (Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc)
They can succeed, but they have to use the same curve. If the went to grade school in an underfunded rural alabama schoolhouse then they can study in their early 20s and go through college a bit later.